Residential segregation and cultural dissemination: An Axelrod-Schelling model

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2009, Pages

  Gracia Lazaro C ^a   Lafuerza, L F ^b   Floria L M ^a   Moreno, Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA INTERDISCIPLINAR Y SISTEMAS COMPLEJOS IFISC CSIC UIB   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

A-DENSITY; AXELROD'S MODEL; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION; SCHELLING;

EID: 70449109572     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.046123     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. R. Axelrod and L. Tesfatsion, in Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, edited by, L. Tesfatsion, and, K. L. Judd, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2006).
2. T. C. Schelling, J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143 (1971).
3. T. C. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior (Norton, New York, 1978).
4. R. Axelrod, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203 (1997). 10.1177/ 0022002797041002001
5. C. Castellano, M. Marsili, and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3536 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3536
6. C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591 (2009). 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591
7. D. Vilone, A. Vespignani, and C. Castellano, Eur. Phys. J. B 30, 399 (2002). 10.1140/epjb/e2002-00395-2
8. F. Vázquez and S. Redner, EPL 78, 18002 (2007). 10.1209/0295-5075/78/18002
9. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 026120 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026120
10. K. Klemm, Physica A 327, 1 (2003). 10.1016/S0378-4371(03)00428-X
11. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguiluz, R. Toral, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 67, 045101 (R) (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.045101
12. K. Klemm, J. Econ. Dyn. Control 29, 321 (2005). 10.1016/j.jedc.2003.08. 005
13. Y. Shibanai, S. Yasuno, and I. Ishiguro, J. Conflict Resolut. 45, 80 (2001). 10.1177/0022002701045001004
14. J. C. González-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, and K. Tucci, Phys. Rev. E 72, 065102 (R) (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.065102
15. J. C. González-Avella, V. M. Eguiluz, M. G. Cosenza, K. Klemm, J. L. Herrera, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. E 73, 046119 (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046119
16. S. Galam, J. Stat. Phys. 61, 943 (1990) 10.1007/BF01027314
17. S. Galam, B. Chopard, A. Masselor, and M. Droz, Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 529 (1998). 10.1007/s100510050410
18. D. J. Daley and D. J. Kendall, Nature (London) 204, 1118 (1964). 10.1038/2041118a0
19. M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
20. R. Axtell, R. Axelrod, J. M. Epstein, and M. D. Cohen, Comput. Math. Org. Theory 1, 123 (1996). 10.1007/BF01299065
21. As it happens also for the genuine (i.e., without mobility) Axelrod model, no qualitative differences appear for different values of F≥3; the only difference being that larger values of F make it easier the convergence to cultural globalization. One can easily realize that the probability that the overlap between two randomly chosen cultures, say i and j, is positive P (ωij >0) = 1- [(q-1)/q] F, is an increasing function of the parameter F.
22. D. Vinkovic and A. Kirman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 19261 (2006). 10.1073/pnas.0609371103
23. D. Stauffer and S. Solomon, Eur. Phys. J. B 57, 473 (2007). 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00181-8
24. L. Dall'Asta, C. Castellano, and M. Marsili, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2008), L07002. 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/07/L07002
25. L. Gauvin, J. Vannimenus, and J.-P. Nadal, Eur. Phys. J. B 70, 293 (2009). 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00234-0
26. W. A. V. Clark and M. Fossett, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4109 (2008). 10.1073/pnas.0708155105