An improved MLMA+ and its application in ontology matching

2009 Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, CITISIA 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 56-60

  Akbari, Ismail ^a   Fathian, Mohammad ^a   Badie, Kambiz ^b  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b IRAN TELECOMMUNICATION RESEARCH CENTER   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION TIME; MEMORY USAGE; MULTI-LEVEL; ONTOLOGY MATCHING; ONTOLOGY MERGING; QUERY REWRITINGS; SEARCH TECHNIQUE; SIMILARITY MEASURE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 70449097987     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CITISIA.2009.5224242     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. T. Gruber, Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 (5/6) (1995) 907-928.
2. J. Euzenat, An API for ontology alignment. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), pages 698-712, (Hiroshima, 2004).
3. A. Alasoud, V. Haarslev, and N. Shiri, An Effective Ontology Matching Technique. In: A. An and S. Matwin and Z. W. Ras and D. Slezak (ed.), Proceedings of 17th Int'l Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (ISMIS'08), LNAI 4994, pages 585-590, (Toronto, 2008).
4. A. Alasoud, V. Haarslev, and N. Shiri, A Multi Level Matching Algorithm for Combining Similarity Measures in Ontology Integration. In ODBIS VLDB-Workshop Post-proceedings, LNCS 4623, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-17, (Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).
5. A. Alasoud, V. Haarslev, and N. Shiri, An Empirical Comparison of Ontology Matching Techniques. Journal of Information Science, pp. 1-20, XX(X) (2008).
6. W. Cohen, P. Ravikumar, and S. Fienberg, A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks. IJCAI-03 (2003) 3-78.
7. T. Pedersen and S. Patwardhan, WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the Relatedness of Concepts. In Proceedings of 19th National Conference on AI, (San Jose, CA, 2004).
8. A. Monge and C. Elkan, The field-matching problem: algorithm and applications. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, (Portland, 1996).
9. M. A. Jaro, Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association (84) (1989) 414-420.
10. M. A. Jaro, Probabilistic linkage of large public health data files (disc: P687-689). Statistics in Medicine (14) (1995) 491-498.
11. P. Shvaiko, J. Euzenat, and F. Giunchiglia and H. Stuckenschmidt, Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2008. In Ontology Matching Workshop, The 7th International Semantic Web Conference. (Karlsruhe, 2008).
12. Y. Li, J. Li, D. Zhang, and J. Tang, Results of ontology alignment with RiMOM. In Proceedings Int'l workshop on Ontology Matching (OM), pages 216-224, (Athens, Georgia, 2007).
13. W. Hu, G. Cheng, D. Zheng, X. Zhong, and Y. Qu, The results of Falcon-AO. In Proceedings Int'l workshop on Ontology Matching (OM), pages 160-167, (Athens, Georgia, 2007).
14. J. Euzenat, A. Isaac, C. Meilicke, P. Shvaiko, H. Stuckenschmidt, O. Šváb, V. Svátek, W. Robert, V. Hage, and M. Yatskevich, Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative. In Proceedings of the ISWC workshop on Ontology Matching, (Busan, Korea, 2007). Available at: http://www.dit.unitn.it/~p2p/OM-2007/OM-2007proc.pdf.
15. J. Euzenat, M. Mochol, P. Shvaiko, H. Stuckenschmidt, O. Svab, V Svatek, W. Robert, V. Hage, and M. Yatskevich, Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2006. In Proceedings of ISWC workshop on Ontology Matching, pages 73-95, (Athens, 2006).