Heavy quark free energies and screening in SU(2) gauge theory

Physical Review D

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Digal, S ^a   Fortunato, S ^a   Petreczky, P ^b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELEMENTARY PARTICLE; ENERGY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; RELIABILITY; SCREENING; SIMULATION; THEORY;

EID: 7044281660     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.034008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. O. Kaczmarek et al., Phys. Rev. D 62, 034021 (2000).
2. O. Philipsen, Phys. Lett. B 535, 138 (2002).
3. O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, and F. Zantow, Phys. Lett. B 543, 41 (2002).
4. F. Zantow, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, and P. Petreczky, hep-lat/0301015.
5. T. Matsui and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 178, 416 (1986).
6. S. Digal, P. Petreczky, and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 514, 57 (2001);
7. Phys. Rev. D 64, 094015 (2001).
8. For a recent discussion and further references see: R.D. Pisarski, hep-ph/0203271.
9. J. Engels et al., Nucl. Phys. B280, 577 (1987).
10. A. Irbäck et al., Nucl. Phys. B363, 34 (1991).
11. N. Attig et al., Phys. Lett. B 209, 65 (1988).
12. J. Engels, F. Karsch, and H. Satz, Nucl. Phys. B315, 419 (1989).
13. P. Petreczky et al., Nucl. Phys. A698, 400 (2002).
14. L.D. McLerran and B. Svetitsky, Phys. Rev. D 24, 450 (1981).
15. S. Nadkarni, Phys. Rev. D 34, 3904 (1986).
16. J. Engels, F. Karsch, and K. Redlich, Nucl. Phys. B435, 295 (1995).
17. J. Fingberg, U.M. Heller, and F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. B392, 493 (1992).
18. S. Necco and R. Sommer, Nucl. Phys. B622, 328 (2002).
19. C. Michael and S.J. Perantonis, J. Phys. G 18, 1725 (1992).
20. N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto, and A. Vairo, Nucl. Phys. B566, 275 (2000).
21. S.P. Booth et al., Nucl. Phys. B394, 509 (1993).
22. K.J. Juge, J. Kuti, and C. Morningstar, Proceedings of the John Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory 24, Non-Perturbative QFT Methods and their Applications, Budap est, 2000, pp. 143-167, hep-lat/0103008.
23. S. Necco and R. Sommer, Phys. Lett. B 523, 135 (2001).
24. U.M. Heller, F. Karsch, and J. Rank, Phys. Rev. D 57, 1438 (1998).
25. A.D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 96B, 289 (1980).
26. S. Nadkarni, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3738 (1986).
27. C. Michael and A. McKerrell, Phys. Rev. D 51, 3745 (1995).
28. 2 from the correlator. As far as we are interested only in the large distance behavior this is equivalent to fitting the free energies. Only in the thermodynamic limit the connected correlator vanishes at very large distance. Therefore we allow for a constant B in our fit ansatz. It turns out, however, that this constant is compatible with zero within present statistical accuracy.
29. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B503, 357 (1997);
30. F. Karsch, M. Oevers, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Lett. B 442, 291 (1998);
31. A. Hart and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. B572, 243 (2000);
32. A. Hart, M. Laine, and O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys., ibid. B586, 443 (2000);
33. O. Philipsen, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 94, 49 (2001).
34. U.M. Heller, F. Karsch, and J. Rank, Phys. Lett. B 355, 511 (1995).
35. S. Datta and S. Gupta, Nucl. Phys. B534, 393 (1998);
36. Phys. Lett. B 471, 382 (2000).
37. R. Fiore, A. Papa, and P. Provero, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114508 (2003).
38. P. Lacock and T. Reisz, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 30, 307 (1993).
39. K. Redlich and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 208, 291 (1988);
40. K. Redlich and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 213, 191 (1988).