'Unique' particles in soil evidence

Geological Society Special Publication

Volumn 232, Issue , 2004, Pages 97-102

  Sugita, R ^a   Marumo, Y ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF POLICE SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIME; DETECTION METHOD; FORENSIC SCIENCE; SOIL ANALYSIS;

ALGAE;

EID: 7044272726     PISSN: 03058719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.10     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ANTOCI, P. R. & PETRACO, N. 1993. A technique for comparing soil colors in the forensic laboratory. Journal of Forensic Science, 38, 437-441.
2. BARNS, S. M. & NIERZWICKI-BAUER, S. A. 1997. Microbial diversity in ocean, surface and subsurface environments. In: BANFIELDS, J. F. & NEALSON, K. H. (eds) Geomicrobiology: Interactions Between Microbes and Minerals. Reviews in Mineralogy, 35, 35-79.
3. BOCK, J. H. & NORRIS, D. O. 1997. Forensic botany: an under-utilized resource. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 364-367.
4. DUDLEY, R. J. 1975. The use of colour in the discrimination between soils. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 15, 209-218.
5. DUDLEY, R. J. 1977. The particle size analysis of soils and its use in forensic science: The determination of particle size distributions within the silt and sand fractions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 16, 219-229.
6. DUDLEY, R. J. & SMALLDON, K. W. 1978. The objective comparison of the particle size distribution in soils with particular reference to the sand fraction. Medicine, Science and the Law, 18, 278-281.
7. ESAU, K. 1977. Anatomy of Seed Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. GRAVES, W. J. 1979. A Mineralogical soil classification technique for the forensic scientist. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 24, 323-338.
9. JANSSEN, D. W., RUHF, W. A. & PRICHARD, W. W. 1983. The use of clay for soil color comparisons. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28, 773-776.
10. KITAYAMA, S. & MURATA, G. 1979. Coloured Illustrations of Woody Plants of Japan. Vol. II. Hoikusha Publishing Co. Ltd, Osaka.
11. KRSTIC, S., DUMA, A., JANEVSKA, B., LEVKOV, Z., NIKOLOVA, K. & NOVESKA, M. 2002. Diatoms in forensic expertise of drowning: a Macedonian experience. Forensic Science International, 127, 198-203.
12. MACHIDA, H. 1999. Quaternary widespread tephra catalog in and around Japan: recent progress. Daiyonki-Kenkyu, 38, 194-201.
13. MACHIDA, H. & ARAI, F. 1992. Atlas of Tephra in and around Japan. University of Tokyo.
14. MCLAUGHLIN, R. B. 1989-1995. Diatoms: diatom microscopy. Microscope, 37-43.
15. MARUMO, Y. 2003. Forensic examination of soil evidence. Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification, 7, 95-111.
16. MARUMO, Y. & YANAI, H. 1986. Morphological analysis of opal phytoliths for soil discrimination in forensic science investigation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 31, 1039-1049.
17. MINATO, H. 1994a. Mineralogy of natural zeolite resources. In: No. 111 Committee (ed.) Natural Zeolite and Its Utilization. Development of New Utilization of Minerals. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 8-23.
18. MINATO, H. 1994b. Introduction for utilization of natural zeolite in Japan. In: No. 111 Committee (ed.) Natural Zeolite and Its Utilization. Development of New Utilization of Minerals. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, 232-233.
19. MING, D. W. & ALLEN, E. R. 2001. Use of natural zeolites in agronomy, horticulture, and environmental soil remediation. In: BISH, D. L. & MING, D. W. (eds) Natural Zeolites: Occurrence, Properties, Applications. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 45, 619-654.
20. MURRAY, R. C. & TEDROW, J. C. F. 1992. Forensic Geology, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
21. PEARSALL, D. M. 1989. Paleoethnobotany. A Handbook of Procedures. Academic Press, San Diego.
22. PIPERNO, D. R. 1988. Phytolith Analysis. An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. Academic Press, San Diego.
23. POLLAMEN, M. S. 1998. Diatoms and homicide. Forensic Science International, 91, 29-34.
24. ROBERTSON, J., THOMAS, C. J., CADDY, B. & LEWIS, A. J. M. 1984. Particle size analysis of soils: a comparison of dry and wet sieving techniques. Forensic Science International, 24, 209-217.
25. SUGITA, R. & MARUMO, Y. 1996. Validity of color examination for forensic soil identification. Forensic Science Intentional, 83, 201-210.
26. SUGITA, R. & MARUMO,Y. 2001. Screening of soil evidence by a particle combination of simple techniques: validity of particle size distribution. Forensic Science International, 122, 155-158.
27. UGOLINI, F. C., CORTI, G., AGENELLI, A. & PICCARDI, F. 1996. Mineralogical, physical and chemical properties of rock fragments in soil. Soil Science, 161, 521-542.
28. WANOGHO, S., GETTINBY, G. & CADDY, B. 1987. Particle size distribution analysis of soils using laser diffraction. Forensic Science International, 33, 117-128.
29. WANOGHO, S., GETTINBY, G., CADDY, B. & ROBERTSON, J. 1989. Determination of particle size distribution of soils in forensic science using classical and modern instrumental methods. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 34, 823-835.