Limiting regional electricity sector integration and market reform the cases of France in the EU and Canada in the NAFTA Region

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1079-1103

  Van Den Hoven, Adrian ^a,c   Froschauer, Karl ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Union Indust/Employers' CEurope ^*

Author keywords

EU; Intergovernmental factors; Liberal reforms; NAFTA; National interests; Regional electricity sector integration policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044270993     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004268845     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Albert, M. (1990). Les grandes phases du développement industriel de l'électronucléaire en France [The important historical phases in developing nuclear electricity as an industrial sector in France]. In M. Trédé (Ed.), Electricité et électrification dans le monde [Electricity and electrification in the world] (pp. 530-546). Paris: PUF.
2. Andersen, S. (1999). European integration and the changing paradigm of energy policy: The case of natural gas liberalisation (ARENA Working Paper WP99/12). Oslo, Norway: ARENA.
3. Andersen, S. (2000). EU energy policy: Interest interaction and supranational authority (Arena Working Paper WP00/5). Oslo, Norway: ARENA.
4. Aufort, C. (1991, September). Le changement de stratégie nucléaire de la France [France's changing nuclear strategy]. Cahiers du Communisme, pp. 40-46.
5. Barberis, P., & May, T. (1993). Government, industry and political economy. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
6. Bourassa, Robert. (1985). Power from the North. Scarborough, Canada: Prentice Hall.
7. Cambus, C. (1994, May 10). Prospective, planification et programmation dans l'Europe du marché unique [Prospectives, planning and programming in a single European market] (Avis et rapports du Conseil Économique et Social). Journal Officiel de la République Française, 13, 1-63.
8. Canadian Electricity Association and Natural Resources Canada. (2000). Electric power in Canada 1998-99. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
9. Capelle-Blancard, Gunther, & Monjon, Stéphanie. (1999, December 15). Le nucléaire face aux défis économiques en environnementaux du XXIe siècle [The nuclear industry and the economic environmental challenges of the 21st century]. In M.-H. Labbé (Ed.), Le nucléaire à la croisée des chemins: Notes et études documentaires [The nuclear industry at a crossroads: Notes and documentary studies] (pp. 35-51). Paris: La Documentation Française.
10. Clarkson, S. (2002a). Canada's secret constitution: NAFTA, WTO and the end of sovereignty? Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
11. Clarkson, S. (2002b). Uncle Sam and US: Globalization, neoconservatism, and the Canadian state. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
12. Cohen, E. (1992). Le Colbertisme "high tech" - Economie des télécoms et du grand projet [High-tech Colbertism: The telecommunications and megaproject economy]. Paris: Hachette.
13. Commission of the European Communities. (1995). Une politique de l'énergie pour l'Union Européenne - Livre blanc de la Commission Européenne [Energy policy for the European Union: White paper of the European Union] (COM[95] 682). Brussels, Belgium: Author
14. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Electricity liberalisation indicators in Europe (Report compiled by OXERA, the Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Energy System Analysis and Planning, and the Centre ATOM-Université Sorbonne-Pantheon for DG Energy and Transport). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
15. Coon Come, M. (1997, November 13). Decision on Hydro-Québec puts Québec energy supply at risk [Press release]. Toronto: Canada News Wire.
16. Council of the European Communities. (2002a, March 16-17). Presidency conclusions: Barcelona European Council. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
17. Council of the European Communities. (2002b, November 25). Transport, telecommunications and energy [Press release, 2,465th council meeting]. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
18. Damian, M. (1992). Nuclear power: The ambiguous lessons of history. Energy Policy, 20(7), 596-607.
19. Department of External Affairs. (1988). The Canada-United States Free Trade Agreement. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services Canada.
20. Dukert, J. (2000, Autumn). The evolution of the North American energy market: Implications of continentalization for a strategic sector of the Canadian economy. American Review of Canadian Studies, pp. 349-359.
21. Dukert, J. (2002). North American energy interdependence: A critical survey. Paper presented at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, DC.
22. Eising, R. (2000). Bounded rationality and policy learning in EU negotiations: The liberalization of the electricity supply industry (EUI Working Paper 2000/26). San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute.
23. Eising, R., & Jabko, N. (2000). Moving targets: Institutional embeddedness and domestic politics in the liberalization of EU electricity markets (EUI Working Paper 2000/6). San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy: European University Institute.
24. Eising, R., & Jabko, N. (2001). Moving targets: National interests and electricity liberalization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 742-767.
25. Electricité de France. (2000). Annual report. Paris: Author.
26. Electricité de France. (2002). Rapport annuel 2001. Retrieved August 25, 2002, from http://www.edf.fr
27. Enerpresse. (1994, January 28). La politique énergétique française [French energy policy]. Enerpresse, 6003, 3.
28. Ezra, D. (1993). A framework for energy. Political Quarterly, 64(4), 391-395.
29. Froschauer, K. (1999). White gold: Hydroelectric power in Canada. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
30. Helm, D. (2002). Viewpoint: Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition. Energy Policy, 30, 173-184.
31. Helm, D., Kay, John, & Thompson, D. (Eds.). (1989). The market for energy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Henri, J.-P. (1991). La fin du rêve prométhéen? Le marché contre l'etat [The end of the promethean dream? The market versus the state]. Revue de Droit Public, 3/1991, 631-656.
33. International Energy Agency. (2001). Key world energy statistics. Paris: Author.
34. Jasper, J. (1992). Gods, titans and mortals. Energy Policy, 20(1), 653-659.
35. Kalyvas, S. (1994). Hegemony breakdown: The collapse of nationalization in Britain and France. Politics and Society, 22(3), 316-348.
36. Le president d'EDF est prêt à un nouvel èlargissement de la concurrence [Editorial]. (2002, January 9). Le Monde, p. 20.
37. Levi-Faur, D. (2002). On the "net" impact of Europeanization: The EU telecoms and electricity regimes - Between the global and the national. European Integration Online Papers, 6(1).
38. Lucas, N. (1985). Western European energy policies: A. comparative study. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
39. Mandil, C. (1994). Rapport du groupe de travail sur la réforme de l'organisation électrique et gazière française [Report by the working group on the reform of the French electricity and gas industry]. In Cahiers juridiques de l'électricité et du gaz [Review of legal notes on the electricity and gas industry], Paris: Ministère de l'Industrie des Postes et du Commerce Extérieur.
40. Meeus, C. (1999, December 9). Les communistes font de la résistance [The communists resist in Parliament]. Le Point, p. 1420.
41. Ministère de l'Industrie. (1980). Energie: La voie Française [Energy: The French path]. Paris: Author.
42. Ministère de l'Industrie et de l'Aménagement du Territoire. (1990). La politique énergétique de la France [French energy policy]. Paris: Dunod.
43. Ministry of Supply and Services Canada. (1992). North American Free Trade Agreement between the government of Canada, the government of the United Mexican States, and the government of the United States of America. Ottawa: Author.
44. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473-524.
45. Mougel, F. (1992). Nationalisations et dénationalisations en Grande-Bretagne de 1945 à 1990: Un enjeu de pouvoir? [Nationalization and privatization in Great Britain from 1945 to 1990: A risk element of political power?] Revue d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine de l'Étranger, 39, 22-42.
46. National Energy Board. (2001). Canadian electricity: Trends and issues: An energy market assessment. Calgary: Author.
47. Natural Resources Canada. (1996). Electric power in Canada 1996. Montreal: Canadian Electricity Association.
48. Nectoux, F. (1991). L'industrie nucléaire Française en crise: Problèmes économiques et industriels du program électro-nucléaire Français [The French nuclear industry in crisis: Economic and industrial problems in the French nuclear electricity program]. Paris: Greenpeace.
49. Netherton, A. (1988). Hydro and the free trade agreement. International Perspectives, 16(1), 11-14.
50. North American Electric Reliability Council. (2004). Regional reliability councils. Retrieved from http://www.nerc.com/regional
51. North American Energy Working Group. (2002). The energy picture. Ottawa: Natural Resources Canada.
52. North-South Trade & Investment. (2001). Opportunities for Canadian exporters to supply equipment & services to Mexico's electric power industry. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
53. O'Dy, S., & Gravelaine, F. (1978). L'etat EDF [The EDF-state]. Paris: Moreau.
54. Pineau, P., Hira, A., & Froschauer, K. (2004). Measuring international electricity integration: A comparative study of the power systems under the Nordic council, MERCOSUR, and NAFTA. Energy Policy, 32, 1457-1475.
55. Priddle R. (1989, December 11). Regulation of Canadian energy exports in the free trade era. Notes from a speech presented to the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Institute of Public Utilities, Michigan State University, Williamsburg, VA.
56. Résean de Transport d'Electricité, (n.d.). Mission. Retrieved August 25, 2002, from http://www.rte-france.com/htm/fr/qui/qui_mission_indep.htm
57. Richardson, B. (1972). James Bay: The plot to drown the North. Toronto, Canada: Clarke, Irwin.
58. Richardson, B. (1979). Strangers devour the land. Vancouver, Canada: Douglas & McIntyre.
59. Rocco, Anne-Marie. (1998, December 1). Pour 13 millards de francs, EDF s'adjuge aux deux millions d'abonnés londoniens [EDF gains 2 million London customers for 13 billion francs]. Le Monde, p. 20.
60. Ross, D. (2002). How level is the energy playing field? Energy Policy, 30(8), 717-719.
61. Schmidt, S. (1996). Sterile debates and dubious generalizations: An empirical critique of European integration theory based on the integration processes in telecommunications and electricity (MPIFG Discussion Paper 95[6]). Cologne, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
62. Schmidt, Vivien. (1996). From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Stoffaës, C. (1995). Services publics: Question d'avenir. Rapport du Commissariat Général au Plan [Public utilities: What future? A report by the French Planning Commission]. Paris: Documentation Française.
64. Szij, E. (1994, November). Privatisations: Logique industrielle ou logique budgétaire? [Privatizations: An industrial or budgetary logic?] Regards sur l'Actualité, pp. 1-12.
65. Tournebise, A. (1992). Les services publics du gaz et de l'électricité et le grand marché Européen [Gas and electricity utilities and the single European market]. Paris: Conseil Économique et Social.
66. Trakman, L. (1997) Dispute settlement under the NAFTA: Manual and sourcebook. New York: Transnation.
67. U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (1997, March 3). Promoting wholesale competition through open access: Non-discriminatory transmission service by public utilities (Docket No. RM95-8-001, Order No. 888-A). Washington, DC: Author.
68. van den Hoven, A. (2002). Le lobbying des entreprises Françaises auprès des institutions communautaires [French corporate lobbying at the European Union]. Clermont, France: Presses de l'Université de Clermont.
69. van Velzen, W. (1997). Quelle Europe de l'énergie? [What European form for energy?]. Brussels, Belgium: M&M Conseil.
70. Vincent, S., & Bowers, G. (Eds.). (1988). James Bay and northern Quebec - Ten years after. Montreal, Canada: Recherches Amerindiennes au Quebec.
71. Vinocur, John. (2002, March 18). Half a loaf result in Barcelona. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.iht.com
72. Wieviorka, M., & Trinh, S. (1989). Le modèle EDF [The EDF model]. Paris: La Découverte.
73. Wilson-Forsberg, S. (2001). Overcoming obstacles on the road to North American integration: A view from Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for the Americas.