Urban land use, mobility and theory of science: Exploring the potential for critical realism in empirical research

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 295-311

  Næss, Petter ^a   Jensen, Ole B ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Causal mechanisms; Critical realism; Land use; Mobility; Prediction

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044269400     PISSN: 1523908X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jepp.114     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T (eds). 1998. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge: London.
2. Beimborn E. 1979. Transportation and public facilities planning. In Introduction to Urban Planning, Catanese AJ, Snyder JS (eds). McGraw Hill: New York; 259-279.
3. Bhaskar R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester Press: Hassocks.
4. Danermark B, Ekstrom M, Jakobsen L, Karlsson JC (eds). 2001. Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. Routledge: London.
5. Dunlap RE, Catton WR Jr. 1983. What environmental sociologists have in common (whether concerned with 'built' or 'natural' environments). Sociological Inquiry 53: 113-135.
6. Flyvbjerg B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
7. Føllesdal D, Walløe L, Elster J. 1996. Argumentasjonsteori, språk og vitenskapsfilosofi. Oslo University Press: Oslo.
8. Harvey D. 1989. The Urban Experience. Blackwell: Oxford.
9. Jones P. 1978. Destination choice and travel attributes. In Determinants of Travel Choice, Hensher D, Dalvi Q (eds). Saxon House: London; 266-311.
10. Klosterman R. 1985. Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review 56(1): 5-20.
11. Lidskog R. 1998. Society, space and environment: towards a sociological reconceptualisation of nature. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research 15: 19-35.
12. Mackie JL. 1965. Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly 2: 245-264.
13. Næss P. 2002. Residential location affects travel behaviour: but how and why? Paper for the XVI AESOP Congress in Volos, Greece, 10-13 July.
14. Næss P. 2001. Residential location and transport in a small Danish town. In Mobility and Transport: An Anthology, Nielsen LD, Oldrúp HH (eds). Danish Transport Council: Copenhagen; 43-61.
15. Nasss P, Saglie I-L. 2000. Surviving between the trenches: planning research, methodology and theory of science. European Planning Studies 8: 529-550.
16. Outhwaite W. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. Macmillan: London.
17. Sayer A. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach (2nd edn). Routledge: London.
18. Sayer A. 1993. Postmodernist thought in geography: a realist view. Antipode 25: 320-344.
19. Sayer A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. Sage Publications: London.
20. Stinchcombe A. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. Harcorurt Brace Jovanovich: New York.
21. Tonboe J. 1993. Rummets sociologi. Kritik af teoretiseringen af den materielle omverdens betydning i den sociologiske og kulturgeografiske tradition. Akademisk forlag: Aalborg.
22. Urry J. 2000. Mobility and proximity. Paper for the seminar Transport and tourism in sociology and geography, Roskilde, 2 November.
23. Williams M, May T. 1996. Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research. UCL Press: London.
24. Yin R. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd edn). Sage Publications: London.