Frames: The method in action and the assessment of its reliability

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 59-77

  Siegel, Paul F ^a,c   Sammons, Mark ^a   Dahl, Hartvig ^b  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DATA ANALYSIS; EMOTION; ETHICS; HUMAN; LIFE EVENT; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; READING; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 7044251472     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptr/12.1.59     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Alexander, I. E. (1990). Personology: Method and content in personality assessment and psychobiography. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
2. Benjamin, L. S. (1974). Structural analysis of social behavior. Psychological Review, 81, 392-425.
3. Cicchetti, D. V. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
4. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290.
5. Dahl, H. (1988). Frames of mind. In H. Dahl, H. Kachele, & H. Thoma (Eds.), Psychoanalytic process research strategies (pp. 51-66). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Dahl, H. (1991). The key to understanding change: Emotions as appetitive wishes and beliefs about their fulfillment. In J. Safran & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Emotions, psychotherapy and change (pp. 130-165). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Dahl, H. (1995). An information feedback theory of emotions and defenses. In H. Conte & R. Plutchik (Eds.), Ego defenses: Theory and measurement (pp. 98-119). New York: Wiley.
8. Dahl, H. (1998). The voyage of el Rubaiyat to the discovery of FRAMES. In R Bornstein & J. Masling (Eds.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories, Volume 9: The psychoanalytic process. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
9. Dahl, H., & Bookstein, P. (1995). Object maps: Their construction, reliabilities, and uses. Unpublished manuscript.
10. Dahl, H., Holtzer, M., & Berry, J. (1992). How to classify emotions for psychotherapy research. Ulm, Germany: University of Ulm Press.
11. Dahl, H., Kachele, H., & Thoma, H. (Eds.). (1988). Psychoanalytic process research strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Dahl, H., & Stengel, B. (1978). A classification of emotion words: A modification and partial test of de Rivera's decision theory of emotions. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 1, 269-312.
13. Dahl, H., & Teller, V. (1994). The characteristics, identification and applications of FRAMES. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 252-274.
14. Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.
15. Demorest, A. (1995). The personal script as a unit of analysis for the study of personality. Journal of Personality, 63, 569-592.
16. Demorest, A., & Alexander, I. E. (1992). Affective scripts as organizers of personal experience. Journal of Personality, 60, 645-663.
17. Demorest, A., & Siegel, P. (1996). Personal influences on professional work: An empirical case study of B. F. Skinner. Journal of Personality, 64, 243-261.
18. Ekman, P. (Ed.). (1973). Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review. New York: Academic Press.
19. Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
20. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22. Hoffman, I., & Gill, M. (1988). A scheme for coding the patient's experience of the relationship with the therapist (PERT): Some applications and extensions. In H. Dahl, H. Kachele, & H. Thoma (Eds.), Psychoanalytic process research strategies (pp. 67-98). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Holtzer, M., & Dahl, H. (1996). How to find FRAMES. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 177-197.
24. Horowitz, M. J. (1979). States of mind: Analysis of change in psychotherapy. New York: Plenum.
25. Izard, C. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
26. Izard, C. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.
27. Jones, E., & Windholz, M. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: Toward a method for systematic inquiry. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 38, 985-1015.
28. Kessel, J., & Zimmerman, M. (1993). Reporting errors in studies of diagnostic performance of self-administered questionnaires: Extent of the problem, recommendations for standardized presentation of results, and implications for the peer review process. Psychological Assessment, 53, 395-399.
29. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
30. Luborsky, L. (1977). Measuring a pervasive psychic structure in psychotherapy: The core conflictual relationship theme. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures (pp. 367-395). New York: Plenum.
31. Luborsky, L. (1990). A guide to the CCRT method. In L. Luborsky & P. Crits-Christoph (Eds.), Understanding transference: The core conflictual relationship theme method (pp. 15-36). New York: Basic Books.
32. Luborsky, L., Barber, J., Binder, Curtis, Dahl, H., Horowitz, M. J., Perry, Schacht, T. E., Silberschatz, & Teller, V. (1992). Transference related measures: A new class based on psychotherapy sessions. In L. Luborsky, J. Barber, & J. Docherty (Eds.), Psychodynamic treatment research. A hand-book for clinical practice (pp. 326-341). New York: Basic Books.
33. Luborsky, L., Popp, C., & Barber, J. (1994). Common and special factors in different transference related measures. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 277-286.
34. McGraw, K., & Wong, S. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30-46.
35. Murray, H. (1962). Explorations in personality. New York: Science Editions. (Originally published 1938)
36. Sammons, M., & Siegel, P. (1997, June). A comparison of FRAMES with core conflictual relationship themes and computerized referential activity. Paper presented at the 20th Ulm Workshop on Empirical Research in Psychoanalysis, Ulm, Germany.
37. Schacht, T. E., & Henry, W. P. (1994). Modeling recurrent patterns of interpersonal relationship with structural analysis of social behavior: The SASB-CMP. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 208-221.
38. Shrout, P., & Fleiss, J. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
39. Siegel, P. (1998, June). FRAMES as nomothetic and idiographic measures of personality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Snowbird, UT.
40. Siegel, P., & Sammons, M. (1997, June). Prototype FRAMES, their instantiations, and the reliabilities of their construction in 11 hours of the case of Mrs. C. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research. Geilo, Norway.
41. Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: W. W. Norton.
42. Teller, V., & Dahl, H. (1986). The microstructure of free-association. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 34, 763-798.
43. Tomkins, S. S. (1970). Affect as the primary motivational system. In M. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 101-110). New York: Academic Press.
44. Tomkins, S. S. (1979). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 201-236). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
45. Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff, A. Rabin, & R. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 147-216). New York: Springer.
46. Weiss, J., & Sampson, H. (Eds.). (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation and empirical research. New York: Guilford Press.