Perceived age, attractiveness and intelligence as a function of first names: Word norms for first names in german;Alter, attraktivität und intelligenz von vornamen: Wortnormen für vornamen im deutschen

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 115-128

  Rudolph, Udo ^a   Spörrle, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Age; Attractiveness; First names; Intelligence; Word norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044251436     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026//0949-3964.46.2.115     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allen, L., Brown, V., Dickinson, L. &Pratt, K. (1941). The relation of first name preferences to their frequency in the culture. Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 279-293.
2. Batson, C. D., Dyck, J., Brandt, J., Batson, J., Powell, A., McMaster, M. &Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 52-77.
3. Brewer, M. B., Ho, H., Lee, J. Y. &Miller, N. (1987). Social identity and social distance among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 156-165.
4. Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
5. Brown, R. & Khosroshahi, F. (1989). Causes of sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Dion, K. L. (1985). Sex differences in desirability of first names: Another nonconscious sexist bias?. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 287-298.
7. Dipboye, R. L., Fromkin, H. L. &Wiback, K. (1975). Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 39-43.
8. Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1-20.
9. Erwin, P. G. & Calev, A. (1984). The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children's essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 223-227.
10. Forgas, J. P., Burnham, D. &Trimboli, C. (1988). Mood, memory, and social judgements in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 697-703.
11. Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women?. Trans-Action: Social Science and Modern Society, 5, 28-30.
12. Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievment-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175.
13. Jamieson, D. W., Lydon, J. &Zanna, M. (1987). Attitude and activity preference similarity: Differential bases of interpersonal attraction for low and high self-monitors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1052-1060.
14. Kasof, J. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140-163.
15. Mehrabian, A. (1988). The name game. Bethesda, MD: National Press Books.
16. Rook, K. S. (1987). Social support versus companionship: Effects on life stress, loneliness, and evaluations by others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1132-1147.
17. Rosenthal, R. (1966). Experimenter effects in social research. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
18. Rudolph, U. (1998). Kontexteffekte und Verbkausalität. München: Zur Publikation eingereichtes Manuskript.
19. Rudolph, U. & Försterling, F. (1997). The psychological causality implicit in verbs. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 192-228.
20. Rudolph, U. &Hecker, U. von (1997). Die Erklärung interpersonaler Ereignisse: Zur Bedeutung von Balanciertheit und Kausalität. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 246-265.