Local time effects in satellite estimates of electromagnetic induction transfer functions

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 31, Issue 16, 2004, Pages

  Balasis, Georgios ^a   Egbert, Gary D ^b   Maus, Stefan ^a,c  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL DATA CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GEOMAGNETISM; GEOPHYSICS; MAGNETOSPHERE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SATELLITE OBSERVATORIES; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; GEOMAGNETIC OBSERVATORIES;

ELECTROMAGNETISM;

EARTH ROTATION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; INDUCED POLARIZATION; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 7044249691     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004GL020147     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Balasis, G., S. Maus, H. Lühr, and M. Rother (2004), Wavelet analysis of CHAMP flux gate magnetometer data, Earth Observation with CHAMP, edited by C. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer and J. Wickert, pp. 347-352, Spring, New York.
2. Banks, R. J. (1969), Geomagnetic variations and the conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 17, 457-487.
3. Campbell, W. H. (1997), Introduction to Geomagnetic Fields, 304 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
4. Constable, S., and C. Constable (2004), Observing geomagnetic induction in magnetic satellite measurements and associated implications for mantle conductivity, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 5, Q01006, doi:10.1029/2003GC000634.
5. Daglis, I. A., and J. U. Kozyra (2002), Outstanding issues of ring current dynamics, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 64, 253-264.
6. Egbert, G. D. (1997), Robust multiple-station magnetotelluric data processing, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 475-496.
7. Everett, M., S. Constable, and C. Constable (2003), Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 277-286.
8. Fujii, I., and A. Schultz (2002), The 3D electromagnetic response of the Earth to ring current and auroral oval excitation, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 689-709.
9. Langel, R. A., and W. J. Hinze (1998), The Magnetic Field of the Earth's Lithosphere: The Satellite Perspective, 429 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
10. Maus, S., and P. Weidelt (2004), Separating the magnetospheric disturbance magnetic field into external and transient internal contributions using a 1D conductivity model of the Earth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12614, doi:10.1029/2004GL020232.
11. Olsen, N. (1998), The electrical conductivity of the mantle beneath Europe derived from C-responses from 3 to 720 hr, Geophys. J. Int., 133, 298-308.
12. Olsen, N. (1999), Induction studies with satellite data, Surv. Geophys., 20, 309-340.
13. Schwarte, J. (2004), Modeling the Earth's magnetic field of magnetospheric origin from CHAMP data, Ph.D. thesis, 130 pp., Tech. Univ. of Braunschweig, Germany.
14. Tsyganenko, N. A. (2002), A model of the near magnetosphere with a dawn-dusk asymmetry: 2. Parameterization and fitting to observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107 (A8), 1176, doi:10.1029/2001JA000220.