Sport gender stereotypes in Italy

International Journal of Sport Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 189-206

  Lauriola, Marco ^a   Zelli, Arnaldo ^b   Calcaterra, Cristina ^b   Cherubini, Domenico ^b   Spinelli, Donatella ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROME FORO ITALICO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Gender schematic processing; Gender stereotyping; Sport

Indexed keywords

EID: 7044232103     PISSN: 00470767     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Antshel, K.M. & Anderman, E.M. (2000). Social influences on sport participation during adolescence. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33, 85-94.
2. Bem S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: one consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643.
3. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androginy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 155-162.
4. Bem, S.L. (1981). Gender Schema Theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 854-864.
5. Cann, A. (1991). Gender expectations and sport participation. In L. Diamant (Ed.). Psychology of Sports, Exercise, and Fitness. New York, NJ: Hemisphere Publishing.
6. th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Sciences, Cologne, 24-28 July 2001.
7. Chia, R.C., Moore, J.L., Lam, K.N., Chuang, C.J., & Cheng, B.S. (1994). Cultural difference in gender role attitudes between Chinese and American students. Sex Roles, 31, 23-30.
8. Colley A., Nash J., O'Donnel L., Restorick L. (1987) Attitudes to the female sex role and sex-typing of physical activities. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 18, 19-29.
9. Everett J.E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18/2, 197-218.
10. Kirchler, A. (19929. Adorable woman, expert man: Changing gender images of woman and man in management. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 363-373.
11. Koivula, N. (1995). Ratings of gender appropriateness of Sports Participation: Effects of Gender-based Schematic Processing. Sex Roles, 33, 8, 543-557.
12. Koivula, N. (1999). Sport participation: differences in motivation and actual participation due to gender typing. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 360-380.
13. Matteo, S. (1986) The effect of sex and gender-schematic processing on sport partecipation Sex Roles, 15, 417-432.
14. Matteo, S. (1988). The effects of gender-schematic processing on decisions about sex-inappropriate sport behavior. Sex Roles, 18, 41-58.
15. Metheny, E. (1967). Connotations of movements in sport and dance. Dubuque, IA: Wm.C.Brown.
16. Ostrow, D.C., Jones D.C. & Spiker D.D. (1981). Age role expectations and sex role expectations for selected sport activities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 52, 216-227.
17. Sabatini, A., & Calcaterra, C. (2002). Differences between males and females in sport activities in relation to assiduity, school qualification, and work.(pp.86-91) In: Gender differences in human movement with special reference to education". Roma: IUSM Press.
18. Singleton, C.H. (1987). Biological and social explanations of sex-role stereotyping. In D.J. Hargreaves and A.N. Colley (Eds.), The Psychology of Sex Roles. Cambridge: Hemisphere.
19. Statsoft, Inc. (2001). Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: Statsoft.
20. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and inter-group relations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. th Edition. Needham Height, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22. Yarnold, P. R. (1990) Androgyny and sex-typing as a continuous independent factors, and a glimpse of the future. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 25, 407-419.