Local invariants for multi-partite entangled states allowing for a simple entanglement criterion

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 383-395

  Aschauer, Hans ^a   Calsamiglia, John ^b   Hein, Marc ^a,b   Briegel, Hans J ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^c ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Entanglement; Local invariants

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ENTANGLED STATE; ENTANGLEMENT; LOCAL INVARIANTS; MIXED STATE; MULTIPARTITE SYSTEMS; PARTIAL TRANSPOSITION; PHYSICAL MEANINGS; POLYNOMIAL INVARIANTS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 7044231434     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen (1935), Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev. 47, 777.
2. E. Schrödinger (1935), The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Naturwissenschaften vol. 23, pp. 807-812, 823-828, 844-849.
3. J. S. Bell (1964), On the einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox, Physics vol. 1, p. 195. Reprinted in J. S. Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics, Cambidge University Press, 1987.
4. J. Schlienz and G. Mahler (1995), Description of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4396 ; G. Mahler, V. A. Weberruß (1995), Quantum Networks: Dynamics of Open Nanostructures, Berlin, Springer.
5. J. Schlienz and G. Mahler (1995), Description of entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 52, 4396 ; G. Mahler, V. A. Weberruß (1995), Quantum Networks: Dynamics of Open Nanostructures, Berlin, Springer.
6. N. Linden and S. Popescu (1998), On multi-particle entanglement, Fortschr. Physik vol. 46, p. 567.
7. M. Grassl, M. Rötteler, T. Beth (1998), Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1833; E. M. Rains (1997), Polynomial invariants of quantum codes, quant-ph/9704042.
8. M. Grassl, M. Rötteler, T. Beth (1998), Computing local invariants of quantum-bit systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, 1833; E. M. Rains (1997), Polynomial invariants of quantum codes, quant-ph/9704042.
9. F. Verstraete, J. Dehaene, and B. D. Moor (2002), Lorentz singular-value decomposition and its applications to pure states of three qubits, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032308.
10. G. Jaeger, M. Teodorescu-Frumosu, A. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich (2003), Multiphoton stakes-parameter invariant for entangled states, Phys. Rev. A 67, 032307.
11. D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White (2001). Measurement of qubits, Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312.
12. R. T. Thew, K. Nemoto, A. G. White, and W. J. Munro (2002), Qudit quantum-state tomography, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012303.
13. J. Schwinger (1960), Unitary operator bases. Proc. NAS 46, no. 4, 570-579.
14. F. T. Hioc and J. H. Eberly (1981), n-level coherence vector and higher conservation laws in quantum optics and quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 838.
15. B.-G. Englert and N. Metwally (2000), Separability of entangled q-bit pairs, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 2221.
16. M. Zukowski and Č. Brukner (2002), Bell's theorem for general n-qubit states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 210401.
17. M. S. Byrd and N. Khaneja (2003), Characterization of the positivity of the density matrix in terms of the coherence vector representation, Phys. Rev. A 68, 062322.
18. H. Barnum, E. Knill, G. Ortiz, R. Somma, L. Viola (2004), A Subsystem-Independent Generalization of Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 107902.
19. A. A. Klyachko (2002), Coherent states, entanglement, and geometric invariant theory, quant-ph/0206012.
20. D. A. Meyer abd N. R. Wallach (2002), Global entanglement in multiparticle systems, J. Math. Phys. 43, 4273.
21. G. K. Brennen (2003), An observable measure of entanglement for pure states of multi-qubit systems, Quantum Inf. Comp. 3, 619.
22. R. F. Werner and M. M. Wolf (2001), All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site, Phys. Rev. A. 64, 032112.
23. J. Calsamiglia et al., in preparation.
24. A. Peres (1996), Separability criterion for density matrices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413.
25. J. K. Stockton, J. M. Geremia, A. C. Doherty, H. Mabuchi (2003), Characterizing the entanglement of symmetric many-particle spin-(1/2) systems Phys. Rev. A. 67, 022112.
26. W. Dür, G. Vidai, and J. I. Cirac (2000), Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A. 62, 062314.
27. M. Hein, J. Eisert, and H. J. Briegel (2003), Multi-party entanglement in graph states, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062311.
28. D. Schlingemann and R. F. Werner (2002), Quantum error-correcting codes associated with graphs, Phys. Rev. A 65, 012308.
29. R. Raussendorf and H. J. Briegel (2001), A One-Way Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188.
30. S. F. Huelga, C. Macchiavello, T. Pellizzari, A. K. Ekert, M. B. Plenio, and J. I. Cirac (1997), Improvement of Frequency Standards with Quantum Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3865.
31. M. Hillery, V. Buzek, A. Berthiaume (1999), Quantum Secret Sharing, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 ; D. Gottesman (2000), On the theory of quantum secret sharing, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042311.
32. M. Hillery, V. Buzek, A. Berthiaume (1999), Quantum Secret Sharing, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 ; D. Gottesman (2000), On the theory of quantum secret sharing, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042311.
33. W. Dür, H. Aschauer, and H. J. Briegel (2003), Multiparticle Entanglement Purification for Graph States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107903.
34. D. M. Greenberger, M. Horne, and A. Zeilinger (1989), Going beyond bell's theorem in "Bell's theorem, quantum theory, and conceptions of the universe" (M. Kafatos, ed.), p. 69, Kluwer.
35. W. Dür and J. I. Cirac (2000), Classification of multiqubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties, Phys. Rev. A. 61, 042314.
36. O. Rudolph (2002), Further results on the cross norm criterion for separability, quant-ph/0202121.
37. K. Chen and L.A. Wu (2003), A matrix realignment method for recognizing entanglement, Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 193.
38. W. Dur (2001), Multipartite Bound entangled States that Violate Bell's Inequality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 230402.
39. J. Uffink (2002), Quadratic Bell Inequalities as Tests for Multipartite Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 230406.
40. K. Nagata, M. Koashi, N. Imoto (2002), Configuration of separability and tests for multipartite entanglement in Bell-type experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 260401.
41. A. Onishchik and E. Vinberg 1990, Lie Groups and Algebraic Groups, Heidelberg, Springer.