Ocean tidal signals in observatory and satellite magnetic measurements

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 31, Issue 15, 2004, Pages

  Maus, S ^a,b   Kuvshinov, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL DATA CENTER   (United States)

^c TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TIDES;

MAGNETIC VARIATIONS; MOTIONAL INDUCTION; SEA WATER; TIDAL SIGNALS;

OCEANOGRAPHY;

FLOW MEASUREMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; OCEAN TIDE; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 7044226527     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004GL020090     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Erofeeva, S., and G. Egbert (2002), Efficient inverse modelling of barotropic ocean tides, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 183-204.
2. Everett, M., S. Constable, and C. Constable (2003), Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 277-286.
3. Kuvshinov, A., and N. Olsen (2004), 3-D modelling of the magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow, CHAMP Mission Results II, Springer Berlin, 359-65.
4. Kuvshinov, A., D. Avdeev, O. Pankratov et al. (2002), Modelling electromagnetic fields in 3D spherical Earth using fast integral equation approach, in 3D Electromagnetics, edited by M. S. Zhdanov and P. E. Wannamaker, chap. 3, pp. 43-54, Elsevier Sci., New York.
5. Laske, G., and G. Masters (1997), A global digital map of sediment thickness, EOS Trans. AGU, 78(46), Fall Meet. Suppl., F483.
6. Lilley, F. E. M., A. White, and G. S. Heinson (2001), Earth's magnetic field: Ocean current contributions to vertical profiles in deep oceans, Geophys. J. Int., 147, 163-175.
7. Malin, S. R. C. (1970), Separation of lunar daily variations into parts of ionospheric and oceanic origin, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 21, 447-455.
8. Maus, S., M. Rother, R. Holme et al. (2002), First scalar magnetic anomaly map from champ satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(14), 1702, doi:10.1029/2001GL013685.
9. Maus, S., H. Lühr, G. Balasis, M. Rother, and M. Mandea (2004), Introducing POMME, the Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth, CHAMP Mission Results II, Springer Berlin, 293-298.
10. McKnight, J. D. (1995), Lunar daily variations in New Zealand, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 889-898.
11. Olsen, N. (2002), A model of the geomagnetic main field and its secular variation for epoch 2000 estimated from Ørsted data, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 454-462.
12. Sanford, T. B. (1971), Motionally induced electric and magnetic fields in the sea, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 3476-3492.
13. Tyler, R. H., J. M. Oberhuber, and T. B. Sanford (1999), The potential for using ocean generated electromagnetic fields to remotely sense ocean variability, Phys. Chem. Earth A, 24, 429-432.
14. Tyler, R., S. Maus, and H. Lühr (2003), Satellite observations of magnetic fields due to ocean tidal flow, Science, 299, 239-241.
15. Wessel, P., and W. H. F. Smith (1991), Free software helps map and display data, EOS Trans. AGU, 72, 441, 445-446.