An evaluation of particle deposition fluxes to cultural heritage sites in Florence, Italy

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 334-335, Issue , 2004, Pages 61-72

  Monforti, F ^a   Bellasio, R ^b   Bianconi, R ^b   Clai, G ^a   Zanini, G ^a  

^a ENEA   (Italy)

^b Enviroware   (Italy)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Monumental damage; Pollutants dry deposition

Indexed keywords

AEROSOLS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONDENSATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METEOROLOGY; NUCLEATION; PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER); PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

CHEMICAL PROFILES; MONUMENTAL STONES;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

CULTURAL HERITAGE; DRY DEPOSITION; MODELING; PARTICULATE MATTER;

AEROSOL; AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIALIZATION; INHERITANCE; INVENTORY CONTROL; ITALY; LIQUID; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT; PARTICLE SIZE; PHASE TRANSITION; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE; TUSCANY; WORLD;

EID: 7044222293     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.030     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Batcharova E., Gryning S.E. Applied model for the growth of the daytime mixed layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 56:1991;261-274
2. Brook J.R., Zhang L., Li Y., Johnson D. Description and evaluation of a model of deposition velocities for routine estimates of air pollutant dry deposition over North America: Part I. Model development. Atmos. Environ. 33:1999;5037-5051
3. CARB, Speciation Profiles and Size Fractions, 2002. Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/emisinv/speciate/speciate.htm.
4. Carter W.P.L. A detailed mechanism for the gas-phase atmospheric reactions of organic compounds. Atmos. Environ. 24A:1990;481-518
5. EEA-EMEP, CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook - 3rd edition, EEA technical report no. 30, 2001. Available at http://reports.eea.eu.int/ technical_report_2001_3/en.
6. Jorquera H. Air quality at Santiago, Chile: a box modelling approach: I. Carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and sulphur dioxide. Atmos. Environ. 36:2002;315-330
7. 10 particulate matter fractions. Atmos. Environ. 36:2002;331-344
8. Lammel G., Metzig G. Pollutant fluxes onto the façades of a historical monument. Atmos. Environ. 31:1997;2249-2259
9. McMahon T.A., Denison P.J. Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters - a survey. Atmos. Environ. 13:1979;571-585
10. Ruijgrok W., Davidson C.I., Nicholson K.W. Dry deposition of particles. Implication and recommendations for mapping of deposition over Europe. Tellus. 47B:1995;587-601
11. Smith R.I., Fowler D., Sutton M.A., Flechard C., Coyle M. Regional estimation of pollutant gas dry deposition in the UK: model description, sensitivity analysis and outputs. Atmos. Environ. 34:2000;3757-3777
12. Wesely M.L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos. Environ. 23:1989;1293-1304
13. Wexler A.S., Lurmann F.W., Seinfeld J.H. Modelling urban and regional aerosols: I. Model development. Atmos. Environ. 28:1994;531-546
14. Zhang L., Gong S., Padro J., Barrie L. A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module. Atmos. Environ. 35:2001;549-560
15. Zhang L., Moran M.D., Makar P.A., Brook J.R., Gong S. Modelling gaseous dry deposition in AURAMS: a unified regional air-quality modelling system. Atmos. Environ. 36:2002;537-560
16. Zilitinkevich S.S. Velocity profile, the resistance law and the dissipation rate of mean flow kinetic energy in a neutrally and stably stratified planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 46:1989;367-387