What antepartum fetal test should guide the timing of delivery of the preterm growth-restricted fetus? a decision-analysis

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 191, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1477-1482

  Odibo, Anthony O ^a,b   Quinones, Joanne N ^a   Lawrence Cleary, Kirsten ^a   Stamilio, David M ^a   MacOnes, George A ^a,b  

^a Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology ^*  (United States)

^b HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biophysical profile; Doppler velocimetry; Fetal testing; Growth restriction; Preterm fetus

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; FETUS GROWTH; FETUS MONITORING; GESTATION PERIOD; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DEATH; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE LABOR; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

BIOPHYSICS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; PREGNANCY; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 7044220870     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.066     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Z. Alfirevic, and J.P. Neilson Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: systematic review with meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 1995 1379 1387
2. J. Thornton Systematic reviews of umbilical artery Doppler: time for more primary research Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17 2001 464 465
3. H.B. Westergaard, J. Langhoff-Roos, G. Lingman, K. Marsal, and S. Kreiner A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analysis in evidence-based obstetrics Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17 2001 466 476
4. K. Hecher, C.M. Bilardo, R.H. Stigter, Y. Ville, B.J. Hackelöer, and H.J. Kok Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: a longitudinal study Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18 2001 564 570
5. A.A. Baschat, U. Gembruch, and C.R. Harman The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18 2001 571 577
6. E. Ferrazzi, M. Bozzo, S. Rigano, M. Bellotti, A. Morabito, and G. Pardi Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19 2002 140 146
7. R. Romero, K.D. Kalache, and N. Kadar Timing the delivery of the preterm severely growth-restricted fetus: Venous Doppler, cardiotocography or the biophysical profile? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19 2002 118 121
8. The GRIT study Group A randomized trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation BJOG 110 2003 27 32
9. A. Johnson, P. Townsend, P. Yudkin, D. Bull, and A.R. Wilkinson Functional abilities at age 4 years of children born before 29 weeks of gestation BMJ 306 1993 1715 1718
10. B.J. Trudinger, W.B. Giles, C.M. Cook, J. Bombadieri, and L. Collins Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance BJOG 92 1985 23 30
11. P.J.H.M. Reuwer, E.A. Sijimons, G.W. Reitman, M.W.M. Van Thiel, and H.W. Bruinse Intrauterine growth retardation: prediction of perinatal distress by Doppler ultrasound Lancet 2 1987 415 418
12. L. McCowan, L.A. Erskine, and K. Ritchie Umbilical artery Doppler blood flow in the preterm small for gestational age fetus Am J Obstet Gynecol 156 1987 655 659
13. R.B. Beattie, and J.C. Dornan Antenatal screening for intrauterine growth retardation with umbilical artery Doppler ultrasonography BMJ 298 1989 631 635
14. J.G. Thornton, and R.J. Lilford Do we need randomized trials of antenatal tests of fetal well-being? BJOG 100 1993 197 200
15. F.A. Manning, I.D. Platt, and L. Sipos Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile Am J Obstet Gynecol 136 1980 787 795
16. F.A. Manning, I. Morrison, I.R. Lange, C.R. Harman, and P.F. Chamberlain Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12620 referred high-risk pregnancies; I, perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology Am J Obstet Gynecol 151 1985 343 350
17. F.A. Manning Intrauterine growth retardation F.A. Manning Fetal medicine: principles and practice 1995 Appleton & Lange Norwalk (CT) 267 273
18. D.J. Rouse, J. Owen, R.L. Goldenberg, and S.P. Cliver Determinants of the optimal time in gestation to initiate antenatal fetal testing: a decision-analytic approach Am J Obstet Gynecol 173 1995 1357 1363
19. M. Hack, J.D. Horbar, M.H. Malloy, J.E. Tyson, E. Wright, and L. Wright Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network Pediatrics 87 1991 587 597
20. G.W. Torrance Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life J Chron Dis 40 1987 593 600
21. F.P.H.A. Vandenbussche, L.C. De Jong-Potjer, A.M. Stiggelbout, S. Le Cessie, and M.J.N.C. Keirse Differences in the valuation of birth outcomes among pregnant women, mothers and obstetricians Birth 26 1999 178 183
22. N. Kuppermann, R.F. Nease, L.A. Learman, E. Gates, and B. Blumberg Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected birth: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences Obstet Gynecol 96 2000 511 516
23. A.K. Dayal, F.A. Manning, D.J. Berck, G.M. Mussalli, C. Avila, and C.R. Harman Fetal death after normal biophysical profile score: an eighteen-year experience Am J Obstet Gynecol 181 1999 1231 1236
24. F.A. Manning, N. Bondaji, C.R. Harman, O. Casiro, S. Menticoglou, and I. Morrison Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring; VIII. the incidence of cerebral palsy in tested and untested perinates Am J Obstet Gynecol 178 1998 696 706