Effects of changing object size during prehension

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 427-435

  Kamp, Cornelis ^a   Bongers, Raoul ^a   Zaal, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coordination; Grasping; Perturbation; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COORDINATION; FEMALE; GRASPING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACHING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SIZE PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 70350786669     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/35-08-033     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bate, P. J., & Hoffmann, E. R. (1995). Limiting motions in prehension. In D. J. Glencross & J. P. Piek (Eds.), Motor control and sensory motor integration: Issues and directions (pp. 383-407). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Bootsma, R. J.,Marteniuk, R. G.,MacKenzie, C. L., & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (1994). The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: Effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics. Experimental Brain Research, 98, 535-541.
3. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (1997). Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 297-310.
4. Bullock, D., & Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychological Review, 95, 49-90.
5. Castiello, U., Bennett, K. M. B., & Stelmach, G. E. (1993). Reach to grasp: The natural response to perturbation of object size. Experimental Brain Research, 94, 163-178.
6. Day, B. L., & Lyon, I. N. (2000). Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Experimental Brain Research, 130, 159-168.
7. Flash, T., & Henis, E. (1991). Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 220-230.
8. Gentilucci, M., Chieffi, S., Scarpa, M., & Castiello, U. (1992). Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: Effects of visual perturbation. Behavioural Brain Research, 47, 71-82.
9. Haggard, P. (1991). The coordination of human prehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge, England.
10. Haggard, P. (1994). Perturbation studies of coordinated prehension. In S. J. Bennett & U. Castiello (Eds.), Insights into the reach and grasp movement (pp. 151-170). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Hoff, B., & Arbib, M. A. (1993). Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 175-192.
12. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural objects. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 153-169, vol. IX). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Jeannerod, M. (1999). Visuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension. Human Movement Science, 18, 201-218.
14. Liu, D., & Todorov, E. (2007). Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 9354-9368.
15. Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Ath̀enes, S. (1990). Functional-relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149-176.
16. Paulignan,Y., Jeannerod M.MacKenzie, C. L.,&Marteniuk, R. G. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: 2. The effects of changing object size. Experimental Brain Research, 87, 407-420.
17. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R., & Jeannerod, M. (1990). The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 79, 431-435.
18. Paulignan,Y.,MacKenzie, C. L.,Marteniuk, R. G.,&Jeannerod, M. (1991). Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements: The effects of changing object position. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 502-512.
19. Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Meunier, M., & Boussaoud, D. (2006). Prehensionmovements in the macaque monkey: Effects of perturbation of object size and location. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 182-193.
20. Schöner, G. (1990). A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement.Biological Cybernetics, 63, 257-270.
21. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (1999). A new view on grasping. Motor Control, 3, 237-271.
22. Soechting, J. F., & Lacquaniti, F. (1983). Modification of trajectory of a pointingmovement in response to a change in target location. Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 548-564.
23. Ulloa, A., & Bullock, D. (2003). A neural network simulating human reach-grasp coordination by continuous updating of vector positioning commands. Neural Networks, 16, 1141-1160.
24. van de Kamp, C., & Zaal, F. T. J. M. (2007). Prehension is really reaching and grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 182, 27-34.
25. Zaal, F. T. J. M., Bootsma, R. J., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1999). Dynamics of reaching for stationary and moving objects: Data and model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 149-161.