Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 201, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 519.e1-519.e8

  Sanses, Tatiana V D ^a   Shahryarinejad, Azin ^b   Molden, Stephanie ^c   Hoskey, Kay A ^a   Abbasy, Shameem ^d   Patterson, Danielle ^e   Saks, Emily K ^f   Weber LeBrun, Emily E ^g   Gamble, Tondalaya L ^h   King, Virginia G ⁱ   Nguyen, Aimee L ^h   Abed, Husam ^j   Young, Stephen B ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^g UMASS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h Division of Urogynecology   (United States)

ⁱ OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

abdominal sacrocolpopexy; apical prolapse; Prolift; vaginal mesh procedure; vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL SACROCOLPOPEXY; ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD VOLUME; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLPOSUSPENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MESH SLING; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THERAPY EFFECT; UNITED STATES; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

AGED; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70350776514     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dallenbach P., Kaelin-Gambirasio I., Jacob S., Dubuisson J.B., and Boulvain M. Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 (2008) 1623-1629
2. Kenton K., Sadowski D., Shott S., and Brubaker L. A comparison of women with primary and recurrent pelvic prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 (1999) 1415-1418
3. Olsen A., Smith V.J., Bergstrom J.O., Colling J.C., and Clark A.L. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89 (1997) 501-506
4. Kenton K., and Mueller E. Surgical repair of the middle compartment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 48 (2005) 691-703
5. Novara G., Galfano A., Secco S., Ficarra V., and Artibani W. Prolapse surgery: an update. Curr Opin Urol 17 (2007) 237-241
6. Barber M.D., Visco A.G., Weidner A.C., Amundsen C.L., and Bump R.C. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 (2000) 1402-1410 discussion 1410-1
7. Karram M., Goldwasser S., Kleeman S., Steele A., Vassallo B., and Walsh P. High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 1339-1342 discussion 1342-3
8. Shull B.L., Bachofen C., Coates K.W., and Kuehl T.J. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 (2000) 1365-1373 discussion 1373-4
9. Silva W.A., Pauls R.N., Segal J.L., Rooney C.M., Kleeman S.D., and Karram M.M. Uterosacral ligament vault suspension: five-year outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 108 (2006) 255-263
10. Wheeler II T.L., Gerten K.A., Richter H.E., Duke A.G., and Varner R.E. Outcomes of vaginal vault prolapse repair with a high uterosacral suspension procedure utilizing bilateral single sutures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18 (2007) 1207-1213
11. Benson J.T., Lucente V., and McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 (1996) 1418-1421 discussion 1421-2
12. Maher C., Baessler K., Glazener C.M., Adams E.J., and Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) CD004014
13. Nygaard I.E., Mccreery R., Brubaker L., et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 104 (2004) 805-823
14. Caquant F., Collinet P., Debodinance P., et al. Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34 (2008) 449-456
15. De Tayrac R., Deffieux X., Gervaise A., Chauveaud-Lambling A., and Fernandez H. Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17 (2006) 483-488
16. De Tayrac R., Gervaise A., Chauveaud A., and Fernandez H. Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. J Reprod Med 50 (2005) 75-80
17. Debodinance P., Amblard J., Fatton B., Cosson M., and Jacquetin B. [The prosthetic kits in the prolapse surgery: is it a gadget. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 36 (2007) 267-275
18. Debodinance P., Cosson M., Collinet P., Boukerrou M., Lucot J.P., and Madi N. Synthetic meshes for transvaginal surgical cure of genital prolapse: evaluation in 2005. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35 (2006) 429-454
19. Hinoul P., Ombelet W.U., Burger M.P., and Roovers J.P. A prospective study to evaluate the anatomic and functional outcome of a transobturator mesh kit (prolift anterior) for symptomatic cystocele repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15 (2008) 615-620
20. FDA med watch page. Food and Drug Administration web site. http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2008/safety08.htm#mesh Accessed Nov. 6, 2008
21. Murphy M. Clinical practice guidelines on vaginal graft use from the society of gynecologic surgeons. Obstet Gynecol 112 (2008) 1123-1130
22. Bump R.C., Mattiasson A., Bo K., et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175 (1996) 10-17
23. Baden W.F., Walker T.A., and Lindsey J.H. The vaginal profile. Tex Med 64 (1968) 56-58
24. Baden W., and Walker T. Surgical repair of vaginal defects (1992), J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA
25. Prolift [package insert]. Prolift Gynecare/Ethicon, Somerville, NJ. Available at: http://www.jnjgateway.com/public/GBENG/PROLIFT_EPI.pdf. Accessed Dec. 5, 2008.
26. Cosson M., Caquant F., Collinet P., et al. Prolift mesh (Gynecare) for pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment using the TVM group technique: a retrospective study of 687 patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2 (2005) 590-592
27. Cosson M., Rosenthal C., Clave H., et al. Prospective clinical assessment of the total transvaginal mesh (TVM) technique for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-6 and 12 month results. Int Urogynecol J 17 (2006) S142
28. Van Raalte H.M., Lucente V.R., Molden S.M., Haff R., and Murphy M. One-year anatomic and quality-of-life outcomes after the Prolift procedure for treatment of posthysterectomy prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199 (2008) 694.e1-694.e6
29. Alperin M., Sutkin G., Ellison R., Meyn L., Moalli P., and Zyczynki H. Peri-operative outcomes of the Prolift pelvic floor repair systems following introduction to a urogynecology teaching service. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 (2008) 1617-1622
30. Altman D., Vayrynen T., Engh M., Axelsen S., and Falconer C. Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19 (2008) 787-793