Previous cesarean section and the risk of postpartum maternal complications and adverse neonatal outcomes in future pregnancies

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 726-730

  Galyean, A M ^a,b   Lagrew, D C ^c   Bush, M C ^c   Kurtzman, J T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LONG BEACH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Memorial Care   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINOGLYCOSIDE ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG UTILIZATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INFANT; INTENSIVE CARE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MULTIPARA; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PUERPERAL INFECTION; PUERPERIUM; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CALIFORNIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; LENGTH OF STAY; PARITY; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT READMISSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PUERPERAL DISORDERS; PUERPERAL INFECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TRIAL OF LABOR; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 70350757807     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.108     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2000 National vital statistics reports; vol 57 no 12 National Center for Health Sciences: Hyattsville, Maryland, 2009.
2. Hall MH, Bewley S. Maternal mortality and mode of delivery. Lancet 1999; 354(9180): 776.
3. van Ham MAPC, van Dongen PWJ, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repro Biol 1997; 74: 1-6.
4. Levine EM, Ghai V, Barton JJ, Strom CM. Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 439-442.
5. Smith G, Pell J, Bobbie R. Cesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 2003; 362: 1774-1775.
6. ACOG Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 289. Surgery and patient choice. The ethics of decision making. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 84(2): 188-193.
7. Wen S, Rusen I, Walker M, Liston R, Kramer M, Baskett T et al. Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with prevous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1263-1269.
8. Loebel G, Zelop CM, Egan JF, Wax J. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004; 15(4): 243-246.
9. McMahon M, Luther E, Bowes W, Olshan A. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 689-695.
10. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt V, Martin D, Easterling T. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 2000; 283: 2411-2416.
11. Minkoff H, Chervenak F. Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 946-950.
12. Rageth JC, Juzi C, Grossenbacher H. Delivery after previous cesarean: A risk evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 332-337.
13. Reyal F, Sibony O, Oury JF, Luton D, Bang J, Blot P. Criteria for transfusion in severe postpartum hemorrhage: Analysis of practice and risk factors. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 112 (1): 61-64.
14. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2581-2589.
15. Mozurkewich E, Hutton E. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1989-1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 187-197.
16. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss. Vols 1-3: Attachment, Separation, Loss. Basic: New York, 1969,73,80.
17. Hook B, Kiwi R, Amini SB, Faranoff A, Hack M. Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 348-353.
18. Keszler M, Carbone MT, Cox C, Schumacher RE. Severe respiratory failure after elective repeat cesarean delivery: A potentially preventable condition leading to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 670-672.
19. Ecker JL. Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (2): 314-318.
20. Tranquilli AL, Garzetti GG. A new ethical and clinical dilemma in obstetric practice: Cesarean section 'on maternal request'. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 245-246.
21. Feldman GB, Freiman JA. Prophylactic cesarean section at term? N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1264-1267.
22. Wax J, Cartin A, Pinette M, Blackstone J. Patient choice cesarean: An evidence based review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2004; 59(4): 601-616.
23. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Visco AG. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 301-306.
24. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 907-912.
25. Rouse DJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. Active-phase labor arrest: Oxytocin augmentation for at least 4 h. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 323-328.