The serine protease Esperase HPF inhibits the formation of multispecies biofilm

Biofouling

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 667-674

  Hangler, Martin ^a,b   Burmølle, Mette ^b   Schneider, Ib ^a   Allermann, Knud ^a   Jensen, Bo ^b  

^a University of Copenhagen ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Antifouling; Multispecies marine biofilm; Proteolytic enzymes

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; MESENTERICOPEPTIDASE; SERINE PROTEINASE; SUBTILISIN;

ANTIFOULING; BACTERIUM; BIOFILM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; IMMOBILIZATION; METABOLISM; OXIDATION; PESTICIDE; PLANKTON; TEMPORAL PERIOD;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOFILM; BIOFOULING; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOFILMS; BIOFOULING; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; SERINE ENDOPEPTIDASES; SERINE PROTEASES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SUBTILISIN;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 70350750279     PISSN: 08927014     EISSN: 10292454     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927010903096008     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aldred N, Clare AS. 2008. The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings [mini-review]. Biofouling 24:351-363.
2. Aluwihare LI, Repeta DJ, Chen RF. 1997. A major biopolymeric component to dissolved organic carbon in surface sea water. Nature 387:166-169.
3. Berges JA, Fisher AE, Harrison PJ. 1993. A comparison of Lowry, Bradford and Smith protein assays using different protein standards and protein isolated from the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. Mar Biol 115:187-193.
4. Bradford MM. 1976. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254.
5. Burmølle M, Webb JS, Rao D, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Kjelleberg S. 2006. Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multi-species biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3916-3923.
6. Delmar EG, Largman C, Brodrick JW, Geokas MC. 1979. Sensitive new substrate for chymotrypsin. Anal Biochem 99:316-320.
7. Dobretsov S, Xiong HR, Xu Y, Levin LA, Qian PY. 2007. Novel antifoulants: inhibition of larval attachment by proteases. Mar Biotechnol 9:388-397.
8. Fletcher M. 1977. Effects of culture concentration and age, time, and temperature on bacterial attachment to polystyrene. Can J Microbiol 23:1-6.
9. Georgieva DN, Stoeva S, Voelter W, Genov N, Betzel C. 2001. Substrate specificity of the highly alkalophilic bacterial proteinase Esperase: relation to the X-ray structure. Curr Microbiol 42:368-371.
10. Holmstrom C, Kjelleberg S. 1999. Marine Pseudoalteromo- nas species are associated with higher organisms and produce biologically active extracellular agents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 30:285-293.
11. Jain A, Bhosle NB. 2009. Biochemical composition of the marine conditioning film: implications for bacterial adhesion. Biofouling 25:13-19.
12. Jefferson KK. 2004. What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm? FEMS Microbiol Lett 236:163-173.
13. Leroy C, Delbarre C, Ghillebaert F, Compere C, Combes D. 2008a. Influence of subtilisin on the adhesion of a marine bacterium which produces mainly proteins as extracel- lular polymers. J Appl Microbiol 105:791-799.
14. Leroy C, Delbarre C, Ghillebaert F, Compere C, Combes D. 2008b. Effects of commercial enzymes on the adhesion of a marine biofilm-forming bacterium. Biofouling 24:11-22.
15. Mah TFC, O'Toole GA. 2001. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol 9:34-39.
16. Maki JS, Rittschof D, Costlow JD, Mitchell R. 1988. Inhibition of attachment of larval barnacles, Balanus amphitrite, by bacterial surface-films. Mar Biol 97:199-206.
17. Marden P, Tunlid A, Malmcronafriberg K, Odham G, Kjelleberg S. 1985. Physiological and morphologicalchanges during short-term starvation of marine bacterial isolates. Arch Microbiol 142:326-332.
18. Matz C, Kjelleberg S. 2005. Off the hook - how bacteria survive protozoan grazing. Trends Microbiol 13:302-307.
19. Molino PJ, Wetherbee R. 2008. The biology of biofouling diatoms and their role in the development of microbial slimes [mini-review]. Biofouling 24:365-379.
20. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. 1998. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multi- ple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol 28:449-461.
21. Olsen SM, Pedersen LT, Laursen MH, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2007. Enzyme-based antifouling coatings: a review. Biofouling 23:369-383.
22. Pasmore M, Costerton JW. 2003. Biofilms, bacterial signal- ing, and their ties to marine biology. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:407-413.
23. Pettitt ME, Henry SL, Callow ME, Callow JA, Clare AS. 2004. Activity of commercial enzymes on settlement and adhesion of cypris larvae of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite, spores of the green alga Ulva linza, and the diatom Navicula perminuta. Biofouling 20:299-311.
24. Rao D, Webb JS, Kjelleberg S. 2005. Competitive interactions in mixed-species biofilms containing the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas tunicata. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1729-1736.
25. Schneider RP, Chadwick BR, Pembrey R, Jankowski J, Acworth I. 1994. Retention of the Gram-negative bacterium Sw8 on surfaces under conditions relevant to the subsurface environment - effects of conditioning films and substratum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 14:243-254.
26. Schultz MP. 2007. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering. Biofouling 23:331-341.
27. Silva CJSM, Zhang Q, Shen J, Cavaco-Paulo A. 2006. Immobilization of proteases with a water soluble- insoluble reversible polymer for treatment of wool. Enzyme Microb Technol 39:634-640.
28. Simon M, Azam F. 1989. Protein-content and protein- synthesis rates of planktonic marine-bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201-213.
29. Smith AM, Callow JA. editors. 2006. Biological adhesives. Berlin: Springer.
30. Tait K, Joint I, Daykin M, Milton DL, Williams P, Camara M. 2005. Disruption of quorum sensing in seawater abolishes attraction of zoospores of the green alga Ulva to bacterial biofilms. Environ Microbiol 7:229-240.
31. Tasso M, Pettitt ME, Cordeiro AL, Callow ME, Callow JA, Werner C. 2009. Antifouling potential of Subtilisin A immobilized to maleic anhydride copolymer thin films. Biofouling 25:505-516.
32. Townsin RL. 2003. The ship hull fouling penalty. Biofouling 19:9-15.
33. Wahl M. 1989. Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling - some basic aspects. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58:175-189.
34. WHOI. 1952. Marine fouling and its prevention. Annapolis: US Naval Institute.
35. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. 2004. Antifouling technology - past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coat-ings. Prog Org Coat 50:75-104.
36. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Weinell CE, Dam-Johansen K. 2006. Effects of marine microbial biofilms on the biocide release rate from antifouling paints - a model-based analysis. Prog Org Coat 57:56-66.
37. Zweifel UL, Hagstrom A. 1995. Total counts of marine- bacteria include a large fraction of non-nucleoid-contain- ing bacteria (Ghosts). Appl Environ Microbiol 61:2180- 2185.