'Conservation responsibilities' of municipalities for target species. Prioritizing conservation by assigning responsibilities to municipalities in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 93, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 218-228

  Jooss, Rüdiger ^a   Geissler Strobel, Sabine ^b   Trautner, Jürgen ^c   Hermann, Gabriel ^c   Kaule, Giselher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b Working Group for Animal Ecology and Planning ^*  (Germany)

^c Working Group for Animal Ecology and Planning   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conservation priorities; Conservation responsibility; Habitat models; Habitat networks; Landscape planning; Target species

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS;

CONSERVATION PRIORITIES; CONSERVATION STRATEGIES; ENVIRONMENTAL ADMINISTRATION; HABITAT MODEL; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; PATCH CONNECTIVITIES; TARGET SPECIES; WEB-BASED PLANNING;

CONSERVATION;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DATA ACQUISITION; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; GIS; HABITAT CONSERVATION; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERNET; SPECIES CONSERVATION; STATE ROLE;

BADEN-WURTTEMBERG; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 70350746204     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Akçakaya H.R., Mills G., and Doncaster C.P. The role of metapopulations in conservation. In: Macdonald D., and Service K. (Eds). Key Topics in Conservation Biology (2007) 64-84 Malden, MA
2. Anderson L.W., Fog K., and Damgard C. Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 271 (2004) 1293-1302
3. Appelt M., and Poethke H.J. Metapopulation dynamics in a regional population of the blue-winged grasshopper (Oedipoda caerulescens; Linnaeus, 1758). J. Insect Conserv. 1 4 (1997) 205-214
4. Araujo M.B., Cabeza M., Thuiller W., Hannah L., and Williams P.H. Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Glob. Change Biol. 10 (2004) 1618-1626
5. Avery M., Gibbons D.W., Porter R., Tew T., Tucker G., and Williams G. Revising the British Red Data List for birds: the biological basis of U.K. conservation priorities. IBIS 137 (1994) 232-239
6. Beven K. Measurements, models, management and uncertainty: the future of hydrological science. In: Tchiguirinskaia I., Demuth S., and Hubert P. (Eds). River Basins-From Hydrological Science to Water Management (2008), IAHS Publ. 323, Oxfordshire 139-147
7. Carlsson A., and Kindvall O. Spatial dynamics in a metapopulation network: recovery of a rare grasshopper Stauroderus scalaris from population refuges. Ecography 24 4 (2001) 452-460
8. Council of the European Communities, 2007. Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora ('Habitats Directive'), last update.
9. Davies, C.E., Moss, D., Hill, M.O., 2004. Eunis habitat classification revised 2004. Report to the European Environment Agency.
10. Diamond J.M., and May R.M. Island biogeography and the design of natural reserves. In: May R.M. (Ed). Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications (1976), Oxford 228-252
11. DRL-Deutscher Rat für Landespflege (Ed.), 2006. Die Auswirkungen erneuerbarer Energien auf Natur und Landschaft. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 79.
12. Dunn E.H., Hussell D.J.T., and Welsh D.A. Priority-setting tool applied to Canada's landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species. Conserv. Biol. 13 6 (1999) 1404-1415
13. Frank K. Metapopulation persistence in heterogeneous landscapes: lessons about the effect of stochasticity. Am. Nat. 165 (2005) 374-388
14. Geissler-Strobel S., Trautner J., Jooss R., Hermann G., and Kaule G. Informationssystem Zielartenkonzept Baden-Württemberg. Ein Planungswerkzeug zur Berücksichtigung tierökologischer Belange in der kommunalen Praxis. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 38 12 (2006) 361-369
15. Ginsberg J. Global conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 13 1 (1999) 5
16. GÖG-Gruppe für ökologische Gutachten, 2004. Heuschrecken-Datenbank Baden-Württemberg, P. Detzel. Unpublished database on grasshoppers in Baden-Wuerttemberg. Contact via http://www.goeg.de.
17. Gruttke, H. (Ed.), 2004. Ermittlung der Verantwortlichkeit für die Erhaltung mitteleuropäischer Arten. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt 8. Bonn-Bad Godesberg.
18. Guisan A., and Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135 (2000) 147-186
19. Gustafson E.J., and Parker G.R. Relationships between landcover proportion and indices of landscape spatial pattern. Landscape Ecol. 7 2 (1992) 101-110
20. Gustafson E.J., and Parker G.R. Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landscape Urban Plan. 29 (1994) 117-130
21. Hannah L., Midgley G.F., Lovejoy T., Bond W.J., Bush M., and Lovett J.C. Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Conserv. Biol. 16 1 (2001) 264-268
22. Hanski I. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 63 1 (1994) 151-162
23. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology (1999) New York
24. Hermann, G., 2003. Tagfalter und Widderchen im Landkreis Böblingen. Unpublished database on butterflies and burnets in the county of Böblingen, Germany. Contact via: http://www.tieroekologie.de.
25. Ims R.A. Movement patterns related to spatial structures. In: Hansson L., Fahrig L., and Merriam G. (Eds). Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes (1995) 85-102 London
26. Jennings M.D. Gap analysis: concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecol. 15 1 (2000) 5-20
27. Jooss, R., 2006. Schutzverantwortung von Gemeinden für Zielarten in Baden-Württemberg. Empirische Analyse und naturschutzfachliche Diskussion einer Methode zur Auswahl von Vorranggebieten für den Artenschutz aus landesweiter Sicht. Ph.D. Thesis Institute for Landscape Planning and Ecology, University of Stuttgart [online] URL: http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2007/2967/index.html.
28. Jooss R., Geissler-Strobel S., Trautner J., Hermann G., and Kaule G. Besondere Schutzverantwortung von Gemeinden für Zielarten in Baden-Württemberg. Teil 2: Validierungen des Ansatzes für ausgewählte Anspruchstypen. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 39 2 (2007) 47-56
29. Jooss R., Geissler-Strobel S., Trautner J., Hermann G., and Kaule G. Besondere Schutzverantwortung von Gemeinden für Zielarten in Baden-Württemberg. Teil 1: Ansatz zur Ermittlung besonderer Schutzverantwortungen von Gemeinden für Zielartenkollektive der Fauna. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 38 12 (2006) 370-377
30. Justus J., and Sarkar S. The principle of complementarity in the design of reserve networks to conserve biodiversity: a preliminary history. J. Biosci. 27 4 (2002) 421-435
31. Keitt T.H., Urban D.L., and Milne B.T. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Ecol. Soc. 1 (1997) 1-14
32. Keller V., and Bollmann K. From Red List to species of conservation concern. Conserv. Biol. 18 (2004) 1636-1644
33. Lambeck R.J. Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11 (1997) 849-856
34. Lawton J.H. Are there general laws in ecology?. Oikos 84 (1999) 177-192
35. Levins R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15 (1969) 237-240
36. Ludwig G., and Schnittler M. Ein verbessertes Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Verantwortlichkeit für die weltweite Erhaltung von Arten. Natur und Landschaft 82 12 (2007) 536-540
37. Mace G.M., Possingham H.P., and Leader-William N. Prioritizing choices in conservation. In: MacDonald D., and Service K. (Eds). Key Topics in Conservation Biology (2007) 17-34 Malden, MA
38. MacArthur R.H., and Wilson E.O. The Theory of Island Biogeography (1967) New York
39. Majka D., Jenness J., and Beier P. CorridorDesigner: ArcGIS Tools for Designing and Evaluating Corridors (2007). http://corridordesign.org/ Available at http://corridordesign.org
40. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 (2000) 243-253
41. Margules C.R., and Sarkar S. Systematic Conservation Planning (2007) Cambridge
42. McGarigal K., and Marks B.J. Fragstats-Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantitative Landscape Structure, Version 2. 0 (1994) Corvallis
43. Meir E., Andelman S., and Possingham H.P. Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world?. Ecol. Lett. 7 (2004) 615-622
44. Mittermeier R.A., Myers N., and Thomsen J.B. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 12 3 (1998) 516-520
45. MLR, LUBW-Ministerium für Ernährung und Ländlichen Raum, Landesanstalt für Umwelt, Messungen und Naturschutz Baden-Württemberg (Eds.), 2006. Informationssystem Zielartenkonzept Baden-Württemberg. Planungswerkzeug zur Erstellung eines kommunalen Zielarten und Maßnahmenkonzepts Fauna [online] URL: http://www2.lubw.baden-wuerttemberg.de/public/abt5/zak/.
46. Moilanen A., and Kujala H. Zonation. Spatial conservation planning framework and software. Version 2.0. User manual (2008) Helsinki
47. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., and Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 (2000) 853-858
48. Nicholls A.O. Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority setting. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A., and Ginsberg J.R. (Eds). Conservation in a Changing World (1998) 251-272 Cambridge
49. Opdam P., Steingröver E., and van Rooij S. Ecological networks: a spatial concept of multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan. 75 3-4 (2006) 322-332
50. Pellet J. Conservation of a Threatened European Tree Frog (Hyla arborea) Metapopulation (2005) Lausanne
51. Plachter, H., Bernotat, D., Müssner, R., Riecken, U., 2003. Entwicklung und Festlegung von Methodenstandards im Naturschutz, in: BfN-Bundesamt für Naturschutz (Ed.), Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz 70, 2nd ed., Bonn.
52. Poiani K., Richter B.D., Anderson M.G., and Richter H.E. Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: functional sites, landscapes, and networks. BioScience 50 2 (2000) 133-146
53. Possingham H.P., Andelman S.J., Noon B.R., Trombulak S., and Pulliam H.R. Making smart conservation decisions. In: Soulé M.E., and Orians G.H. (Eds). Conservation Biology. Research Priorities for the Next Decades (2001) 225-244 Washington, DC
54. Primack R.B. Essentials of Conservation Biology. 4th ed. (2006) Sunderland, MA
55. Pulliam H.R. Source, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132 (1988) 652-661
56. Reck, H., Walter, R., Osinski, E., Heinl. T., Kaule, G., 1996. Räumlich differenzierte Schutzprioritäten für den Arten und Biotopschutz in Baden-Württemberg (Zielartenkonzept). Institut für Landschaftsplanung und Ökologie, Universität Stuttgart.
57. Roberge J.-M., and Angelstam P. Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool. Conserv. Biol. 18 1 (2004) 76-85
58. Root R.B. The niche exploitation pattern of the blue gray gnatcatcher. Ecol. Monogr. 37 4 (1967) 317-350
59. Sanderson E.W., Redford K.H., Vedder A., Coppolillo P.B., and Ward S.E. A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landscape Urban Plan. 58 (2002) 41-56
60. Schnittler M., and Günther K.F. Central Europe vascular plants requiring priority conservation measures-an analysis from national Red Lists and distribution maps. Biodivers. Conserv. 8 (1999) 891-925
61. In: Settele J., Margules C., Poschlod P., and Henle K. (Eds). Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes (1996) Dordrecht
62. Simberloff D.S., and Abele L.G. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191 (1976) 285-286
63. Soulé M.E. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity (1986) Sunderland, MA
64. SRU-Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen. Klimaschutz durch Biomasse (2007) Sondergutachten, Berlin
65. Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P., and van den Brink A. Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 79 3-4 (2007) 374-384
66. Thomas C.D. Ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape. In: Pullin A.S. (Ed). Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies (1995) 46-63 London
67. Thomas C.D., and Hanski I. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I., and Gilpin M. (Eds). Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (1997) 359-386 San Diego
68. Treweek J. Integrating biodiversity with national environmental assessment processes. A Review of Experiences and Methods (2001) Bristol
69. Walter R., Reck H., Kaule G., Lämmle M., Osinski E., and Heinl T. Regionalisierte Qualitätsziele, Standards und Indikatoren für die Belange des Arten und Biotopschutzes in Baden-Württemberg.-Das Zielartenkonzept-ein Beitrag zum Landschaftsrahmenprogramm des Landes Baden-Württemberg. Natur und Landschaft 73 1 (1998) 9-25
70. Whittaker R.J. Island Biogeography. Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation (1998) New York
71. Williams P.H. Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace G.M., Balmford A., and Ginsberg J.R. (Eds). Conservation in a Changing World (1998) Cambridge
72. Wilson K.A., McBride M.F., Bode M., and Possingham H.P. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440 (2006) 337-340