Assessment of global phase uncertainty in case-control studies

BMC Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages 54-

  Uh, Hae Won ^a   Houwing Duistermaat, Jeanine J ^a   Putter, Hein ^a   van Houwelingen, Hans C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 1BETA;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC RISK; HAPLOTYPE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; UNCERTAINTY; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETICS; MIDDLE AGED; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; GENE FREQUENCY; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; INTERLEUKIN-1BETA; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 70350741455     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-54     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stram DO, Haiman JN, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Pike ML. Choosing haplotype-tagging SNPs based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the multiethnic cohort study. Hum Hered 2003, 55:27-36. 10.1159/000071807, 12890923.
2. Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 70:425-434. 10.1086/338688, 384917, 11791212.
3. Uh HW, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Putter H, van Houwelingen JJC. How to quantify information loss due to phase ambiguity in haplotype case-control studies. BMC Genet 2005, 6(Suppl 1):S108. 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S108, 1866831, 16451564.
4. Atkinson AC, Donev AN. Optimum Experimental Designs 1992, 8. Oxford: Oxford Statistical Science Series.
5. Fedorov V. Theory of optimal experiments 1972, New York: Academic Press.
6. Nicolae DL. Quantifying the amount of missing information in gentic association studies. Genet Epi 2006, 30:703-717.
7. O'Hely M, Slatkin M. The loss of statistical power to distinguish population when certain samples are ambiguous. Theor Pop Biol 2003, 64:177-192.
8. The R project for statistical computing. , http://www.r-project.org/
9. Hofman A, Grobbee D, de Jong PT, Ouweland FA. Determinants of disease and disability in elderly: the Rotterdam Elderly Study. Eur J Epi 1991, 7:403-422.
10. Meulenbelt I, Seymour AB, Nieuwland M, Huizinga TWJ, van Duijn CM, Slagboom PE. Association of the Interleukin-1 gene cluster with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2004, 50(4):1179-1186.
11. Tregouet DA, S E, Tiret L, Mallet A, Golmard JL. A new maximum likelihood algorithm for haplotype-based association analysis: the SEM algorithm. Ann Hum Genet 2003, 68:165-177.
12. Putter H, Meulenbelt I, van Houwelingen JJC. Relative efficiency of haplotype frequency estimation in sibships and nuclear families compared to unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 2007, 64:52-62. 10.1159/000101423, 17483597.
13. Zaykin DV, Meng Z, Ehm MG. Contrasting linkage-disequilibrium patterns between cases and controls as a novel association-mapping method. Am J Hum Genet 2006, 78:737-746. 1474029, 16642430, 10.1086/503710.
14. van Minkelen R, de Visser MC, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Vos HL, Bertina RM, Rosendaal FR. Haplotypes of IL1B, IL1RN, and IL1R2 and the risk of venous thrombosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007, 27:1486-1491. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.140384, 17413037.
15. Zheng G. Can the allelic test be retired from analysis of case-control association studies?. Ann Hum Genet 2008, 72:848-851. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00466.x, 18652599.
16. Sasieni PD. From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. Biometrics 1997, 53:1253-1261. 10.2307/2533494, 9423247.
17. Satten GA, Epstein MP. Comparison of prospective and retreospective methods for haplotype inference in case-control studies. Genet Epi 2004, 27:192-201.
18. Rao CR, Mitra SK. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications 1971, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Louis TA. Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc 1982, 44(2):226-233.
20. Lehmann EL. Theory of point estimation 1983, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Minkin S. Optimal Designs for Binary Data. J Amer Stat Assoc 1987, 82:1098-1103.
22. Heise MA, Myers RH. Optimal Designs for Bivariate Logistic Regression. Biometrics 1996, 52:613-624.
23. Cox DR, Hinkley DV. Theoretical Statistics 1974, London: Chapman and Hall.