Disco operation considering DG units and their goodness factors

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1831-1840

  Algarni, Ayed A S ^a   Bhattacharya, Kankar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Disco operation; Distributed generation; Goodness factors; Incremental loss index

Indexed keywords

BUS SYSTEMS; DG UNIT; DISCO OPERATION; DISCO OPERATIONS; DISTRIBUTED GENERATION; DISTRIBUTED GENERATIONS; DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES; DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; ENERGY COST; GOODNESS FACTORS; INCREMENTAL LOSS INDEX; OPTIMAL POWER FLOWS; REACTIVE POWER LOSS; SHORT TERM;

ACOUSTIC GENERATORS; BUSES; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; POWER ELECTRONICS;

GALERKIN METHODS;

EID: 70350731167     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2030358     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. N. Jenkins, R. Allan, P. Crossley, D. Kirschen, and G. Strbac, Embedded Generation. London, U.K.: Inst. Elect. Eng., 2000, vol. 31, IEE Power and Energy Series.
2. G. Pepermans, J. Driesen, D. Haeseldonckx, R. Belmans, and W. D'haeseleer, "Distributed generation: Definition, benefits and issues," Energy Pol., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 787-798, Apr. 2005.
3. P. M. Costa and M. A. Matos, "Loss allocation in distribution networks with embedded generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 384-389, Feb. 2004.
4. J. Mutale, G. Strbac, S. Curcic, and N. Jenkins, "Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation," Proc. Inst. Elect. Eng., Gen., Transm., Distrib., vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 7-14, Jan. 2000.
5. M. Thomson and D. G. Infield, "Network power-flow analysis for a high penetration of distributed generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1157-1162, Aug. 2007.
6. S. Tong and K. N. Miu, "A network-based distributed slack bus model for DGs in unbalanced power flow studies," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 835-842, May 2005.
7. H. A. Gil and G. Joos, "On the quantification of the network capacity deferral value of distributed generation," IEEE Trans. Power Syst. vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1592-1599, Nov. 2006.
8. P. Chiradeja and R. Ramakumar, "An approach to quantify the technical benefits of distributed generation," IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 764-773, Dec. 2004.
9. L. F. Ochoa, A. Padilha-Feltrin, and G. P. Harrison, "Evaluating distributed generation impacts with a multiobjective index," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1452-1458, Jul. 2006.
10. P. M. S. Carvalho, P. F. Correia, and L. A. F. M. Ferreira, "Distributed reactive power generation control for voltage rise mitigation in distribution networks," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 766-772, May 2008.
11. N. R. Ullah, K. Bhattacharya, and T. Thiringer, "Wind farms as reactive power ancillary service providers- technical and economic issues," IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 661-672, Sep. 2009.
12. M. E. Baran and F. F. Wu, "Optimal sizing of capacitor placed on radial distribution systems," IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 735-743, Jan. 1989.
13. "GAMS release 2.25," in A User's Guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation, 1998.