Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices - Longitudinal study during relocation

Ergonomics

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1423-1444

  Kaarlela Tuomaala, A ^a   Helenius, R ^a   Keskinen, E ^b   Hongisto, V ^a  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Indoor environment; Irrelevant speech effect; Landscaped offices; Office noise; Office satisfaction; Open plan offices; Private office rooms; Productivity; Speech; Speech intelligibility; Work performance

Indexed keywords

INDOOR ENVIRONMENT; IRRELEVANT SPEECH EFFECT; LANDSCAPED OFFICES; OFFICE NOISE; OFFICE SATISFACTION; OPEN-PLAN OFFICES; PRIVATE OFFICE ROOMS; WORK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ACOUSTICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; OFFICE BUILDINGS; PRODUCTIVITY;

SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; COPING BEHAVIOR; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; ERGONOMICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL CONCENTRATION; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIVACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; TELEPHONE; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORK SCHEDULE; WORKING TIME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERIOR DESIGN AND FURNISHINGS; JOB SATISFACTION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;

EID: 70350728336     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903154579     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Allen, T.J. and Gerstberger, P.G., 1973. A field experiment to improve communication in a product engineering department: The non-territorial office. Human Factors, 15, 487-498.
2. Banbury, S. and Berry, D.C., 1997. Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3, 181-195.
3. Banbury, S. and Berry, D.C., 1998. Disruption of officerelated tasks by speech and office noise. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 499-517.
4. Banbury, S.P. and Berry, D.C., 2005. Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics, 48 (1), 25-37.
5. Banbury, S.P., et al., 2001. Auditory distraction and shortterm memory: Phenomena and practical implications. Human Factors, 43 (1), 12-29.
6. Becker, F.D., et al., 1983. Office design in a community college. Environment and Behavior, 15, 699-726.
7. Boje, A., 1971. Open-plan offices. In: B.H. Walley, ed. London: Business Books.
8. Boyce, P.R., 1974. User's assessments of a landscaped office. Journal of Architectural Research, 3, 44-62.
9. Brennan, A., Chugh, J.S., and Kline, T., 2002. Traditional versus open office design - A longitudinal field study. Environment and Behavior 34 (3), 279-299.
10. Brill, M., et al., 1984. Using office design to increase productivity, volume 1. Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design & Productivity.
11. Brookes, M.J. and Kaplan, A., 1972. The office environment: Space planning and affective behavior. Human Factors, 14 (5), 373-391.
12. Colle, H.A., 1980. Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722-735.
13. Colle, H.A. and Welsh, A., 1976. Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-31.
14. Danielsson, C., 2005. Office environment, health and job satisfaction Licentiate Thesis. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Technology and Health.
15. de Croon, E.M., et al., 2005. The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48 (2), 119-134.
16. Ellermeier, W. and Hellbrück, J., 1998. Is level irrelevant in irrelevant speech? Effects of loudness, signal-to-noise ratio, and binaural unmasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24 (5), 1406-1414.
17. Evans, G.W. and Johnson, D., 2000. Stress and open-office noise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (5), 779-783.
18. Eysenck, H.J. and Eysenck, S.B.G., 1972. Eysenck Personality Inventory, Form A. 2nd ed. London: University of London Press, Hazell Watson & Viney, Bucks.
19. Griefahn, B., 2008. Determination of noise sensitivity within an internet survey using a reduced version of the Noise Sensitivity Questionnaire. Acoustics, 2008/3460.
20. Haapakangas, A., et al., 2008. Perceived acoustic environment, work performance and well-being - survey results from Finnish offices. In: 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN) 2008, 21-25 July, Mashantucket, Connecticut, USA. Dortmund, Germany: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 434-441.
21. Haka, M., et al., 2009. Performance effects and subjective disturbance of speech in acoustically different office types - laboratory experiment. Indoor Air. Available from: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122386634/ abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0.
22. Helenius, R. and Hongisto, V., 2004. The effect of acoustical improvement of an open-plan office on workers. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2004, paper 674, 21-25 August, Prague, Czech Republic.
23. Hongisto, V., 2005. A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. Indoor Air, 15, 458-468.
24. Hongisto, V., 2008. Effects of sound masking on workers - a case study in a landscaped office. In: 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN) 2008, 21-25 July, Mashantucket, Connecticut, USA. Dortmund, Germany: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, 442-449.
25. Hongisto, V., Keränen, J., and Larm, P., 2004. Simple model for the acoustical design of open-plan offices. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 90, 481-495.
26. Houtgast, T. and Steeneken, H.J.M., 1985. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77 (3), 1069-1077.
27. Hundert, A.T. and Greenfield, N., 1969. Physical space and organizational behavior: A study of office landscape. In: Proceedings of the 77th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 601-602.
28. International Organization for Standardization, 1995. ISO 140-4:1995 (E). Acoustics _Ds-measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements, part 4: Field measurements of airborne sound insulation of between rooms.
29. International Organization for Standardization, 1996. ISO 717-1:1996 (E). Acoustics _Ds rating of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements, part 1: Airborne sound insulation.
30. International Organization for Standardization, 1997. EN ISO 11654:1997. Acoustics - Sound absorbers for use in buildings - Rating of sound absorption.
31. International Organization for Standardization, 2009. Committee draft ISO/CD 3382-3. Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters - Part 3: Open plan spaces (ISO TC 43 SC 2, N969, 2009-04-14).
32. Ives, R.S. and Ferdinands, R., 1974. Working in a landscaped office. Personnel Practice Bulletin, 30 (2), 126-141.
33. Jensen, K.L., Arens, E., and Zagreus, L., 2005. Acoustical quality in office workstations as assessed by occupant surveys. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, 4-9 September, Beijing, China, CD-ROM, 2401-2405.
34. Jones, D., et al., 2008. Varieties of auditory distraction. In 9th international congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN), Foxwoods. Dortmund, Germany: Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors.
35. Jones, D.M., Madden, C., and Miles, C., 1992. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 645-659.
36. Kaarlela, A., et al., 2003. Acoustical environment questionnaire for offices - method development. Work Environment Research Report Series 4 (In Finnish, abstract in English). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
37. Kankkunen, E., et al., 2009. Comparison of five speech masking sounds for open-plan offices - Laboratory experiment measuring performance and acoustic satisfaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. April. Submitted for publication.
38. Keighley, E.C., 1970. Acceptability criteria for noise in large offices. Journal of Sound Vibration, 11 (1), 83-93.
39. Keränen, J., Virjonen, P., and Hongisto, V., 2007. A new model for acoustical design of open-plan offices. In: International congress on acoustics, paper RBA-10-006-IP, 2-7 September, Madrid, Spain. Madrid: Spanish Acoustical Society.
40. Klitzman, S. and Stellman, J.M., 1989. The impact of the physical environment on the psychological well-being of office workers. Social Science Medicine, 29 (6), 733-742.
41. Kraemer, Sieverts & Partner, 1977. Open-plan offices: New ideas, experience and improvements. London, UK: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
42. Lahtinen, M., Sundman-Digert, C., and Reijula, K., 2004. Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: A questionnaire as a means of problem diagnosis. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 143-149.
43. Logie, R.H. and Baddeley, A.D., 1987. Cognitive processes in counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 13, 310-326.
44. Marsh, J.E., Hughes, R.W., and Jones, D.M., 2008. Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A processbased approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 682-700.
45. Morris, N. and Jones, D.M., 1990. Habituation to irrelevant speech: Effects on a visual short-term memory task. Perception and Psychophysics, 47 (3), 291-297.
46. Nemecek, J. and Grandjean, E., 1973. Results of an ergonomic investigation of large-space offices. Human Factors, 15 (2), 111-124.
47. Oldham, G.R., 1988. Effects of changes in workspace partitions and spatial density on employee reactions: A quasi experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 253-258.
48. Oldham, G.R. and Brass, D.J., 1979. Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally-occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 267-284.
49. Pejtersen, J., et al., 2006. Indoor climate, psychosocial work environment and symptoms in open-plan offices. Indoor Air, 16 (5), 392-401.
50. Pick, H.L., et al., 1989. Inhibiting the Lombard effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85 (2), 894-900.
51. Rotter, J.B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1-28.
52. Salamé, P. and Baddeley, A.D., 1982. Disruption of shortterm memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
53. Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., and Lushene, R.E., 1970. STAI-manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. California, USA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
54. Sprecklmeyer, K.F., 1993. Office relocation and environmental change: A case study. Environment and Behavior, 25, 181-204.
55. Sundstrom, E., Herbert, R.K., and Brown, D.W., 1982. Privacy and communication in an open-plan office: A case study. Environment and Behavior, 14 (3), 379-392.
56. Sundstrom, E. and Sundstrom, M.G., 1986. Work places. The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
57. Sundstrom, E., et al., 1994. Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26 (2), 195-222.
58. Tremblay, S., et al., 2000. The irrelevant sound effect: Does speech play a special role? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26 (6), 1750-1754.
59. Veitch, J.A., et al., 2007. A model of satisfaction with openplan office conditions: COPE field findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27 (3), 177-189.
60. Venetjoki, N., et al., 2006. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance. Ergonomics, 49 (11), 1068-1091.
61. Virjonen, P., Keränen, J., and Hongisto, V., 2009. Determination of acoustical conditions in open-plan offices - Proposal for new measurement method and target values. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 95, 279-290.
62. Weinstein, N.D., 1974. Effect of noise on intellectual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (5), 548-554.
63. Zalesny, M.D. and Farace, R.V., 1987. Traditional versus open offices: A comparison of sociotechnical, social relations, and symbolic meaning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 30 (2), 240-259.
64. Zweers, T., et al., 1992. Health and indoor climate complaints of 7043 office workers in 61 buildings in the Netherlands. Indoor Air 2, 127-136.