Comparison of 64 MDCT coronary CTA and coronary angiography in the detection of coronary artery stenosis in low risk patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndrome;Comparaison du scanner 64-détecteurs et de la coronarographie dans la détection des sténoses coronariennes chez des patients porteurs d'angor stable et de syndrome coronaire aigu à bas risques

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 90, Issue 9 C1, 2009, Pages 1055-1066

  Cazalas, G ^a   Sarran, A ^a   Amabile, N ^a   Chaumoitre, K ^a   Marciano Chagnaud, S ^a   Jacquier, A ^b   Paganelli, F ^a   Panuel, M ^a  

^a HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

^b TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Angina; Atherosclerosis; Coronary artery disease; CT

Indexed keywords

ATENOLOL; CALCIUM; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BLOOD VESSEL; BREATH HOLDING; CALCIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CORONARY COMPUTED ANGIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; THICKNESS; ANGINA PECTORIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGINA PECTORIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 70350722228     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(09)73245-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2004 update. 2004, Dallas, American Heart Association.
2. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. http://www.cardioc.org/scripts/documents/Guidelines- NSTE-ACS-FT-2007.pdf
3. de Bono D. Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac complications. The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians of London. Br Heart J 1993;70:297-300.
4. Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW. Multivariable model for prediction of risk of significant complication during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993;30:185-90.
5. Papaconstantinou HD, Marshall AJ, Burrell CJ. Diagnostic cardiac catheterisation in a hospital without onsite cardiac surgery. Heart 1999;81:465-9.
6. Sablayrolles JL, Vignaux O. Diagnostic de la maladie coronaire : scanner des artères coronaires. Feuillets de Radiologie 2005;45:241-50.
7. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos Pa, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multisclice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051-4.
8. Ropers D, Baum U, Poehl K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin slice multi detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003;107:664-6.
9. Hoffmann U, Moseslewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16 slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. Circulation 2004;110:2638-43.
10. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Hoffmann U, et al. Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:842-7.
11. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16 detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:123-5.
12. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16 row multi slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:128-32.
13. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye Rl, et al. A reporting system on patient evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad -Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Councilon Cardiovascular Surgery. Circulation 1975;51:5-40.
14. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Van Mieghem CA, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005;112:2222-5.
15. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: theTask Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1341-81.
16. Fleischmann D. Use of high-concentration contrast media in multiple-detector-row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 2003;13 [suppl 5]:14-20.
17. Boussel L, Douek P, Revel D. Scanner cardiaque : quelle place dans la maladie coronaire ? J Radiol 2006;87:1637-41.
18. Pugliese F, Mollet Nr, Runza G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-82.
19. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7.
20. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-85.
21. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual source computed tomography: initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:331-5.
22. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: First experience in a high pretest probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2739-47.
23. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Van Der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005;236:661-5.
24. Kuettner A, Trabold T, Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection of coronary lesions using 16-detector multislice spiral computed tomography technology: initial clinical results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1230-7.
25. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:2265-70.
26. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006;70:564-71.
27. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of non invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-7.
28. Leber AW, Knez A, Von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-54.
29. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison on Per-Patient and Per-Vessel or Per-Segment Basis at 64-Section CT Angiography. Radiology 2007; 244: 112-20.
30. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Angiography by 64-Row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;27:2324-36.