History of aphasia: Negative optic aphasia: How much semantic does a name need? Wolff's re-examination of Voit

Aphasiology

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1427-1437

  De Bleser, Ria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anomia; History of aphasia; Optic aphasia; Semantic processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANOMIA; APHASIA; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; CASE REPORT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL TASK; NEGATIVE OPTIC APHASIA; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; SEMANTICS; SENSORY EVALUATION; SKULL INJURY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 70350721555     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030802593197     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bartels, C., & Wallesch, C. W. (1996). Nineteenth century accounts of the nature of the lexicon and semantics: Riddles posed by the case of Johann Voit. In C. Code, C. W. Wallesch, Y. Joanette, & A. R. Roch Lecours (Eds.), Classic cases in neuropsychology (pp. 53-68). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
2. Borgo, F., & Shallice, T. (2003). Category specificity and feature knowledge: Evidence from new sensoryquality categories. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 327-353.
3. Brennen, T. (1999). Face naming in dementia: A reply to Hodges and Greene (1998). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 52, 535-541.
4. Brennen, T., David, D., Fluchaire, I., & Pellat, J. (1996). Naming faces and objects without comprehension: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 93-111.
5. Bruns (1891). Reichen die Localisationstheorien zur Erklärung der bisher beobachteten Sprachstörungen aus? Neurologisches Zentralblatt, 9, 612.
6. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
7. Coltheart, M., Inglis, L., Cupples, L., Michie, P., Bates, A., & Budd, B. (1998). A semantic subsystem of visual attributes. Neurocase, 4, 353-370.
8. De Bleser, R. (1989). Grashey's (1885) On aphasia and its relation to perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 515-546.
9. Farrah, M., & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 120 339-357.
10. Forde, E. M. E., Francis, D., Riddoch, M. J., Rumiati, R. I., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). On the links between visual knowledge and naming: A single case study of a patient with a category-specific impairment for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 403-458.
11. Freud, S. (1891). Zur Auffassung der Aphasien. Leipzig and Wien: Franz Deuticke.
12. Grashey, H. (1885). Über Aphasie und ihre Beziehungen zur Wahrnehmung. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 16, 654-688.
13. Hart, J., & Gordon, B. (1992). Neural subsystems for object knowledge. Nature, 359, 60-64.
14. Heilman, K. M. (2006). Aphasia and the diagram makers revisited: An update of information processing models. Journal of Clinical Neurology, 2, 149-162.
15. Heilman, K. M., Tucker, D. M., & Valenstein, E. A. (1976). A case of mixed transcortical aphasia with intact naming. Brain, 99, 415-426.
16. Hodges, J. R., & Greene, J. D. W. (1998). Knowing about people and naming them: Can Alzheimer's disease patients do one without the other? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 51 121-134.
17. Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in objectrecognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 453-476.
18. Kremin, H., Beauchamp, D., & Perrier, D. (1994). Naming without picture comprehension? Apropos the oral naming and semantic comprehension of pictures by patients with Alzheimer's disease. Aphasiology, 8 291-294.
19. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1997). The relationship between naming and semantic knowledge for different categories in dementia of Alzheimer's type. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1251-1260.
20. Laws, K. R. (1998). Why leopards never change their spots: A reply to Moss, Tyler, and Jennings. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15, 467-479.
21. Laws, K. R., Evans, J. J., Hodges, J. R., & McCarthy, R. A. (1995). Naming without knowing and appearance without associations: Evidence for constructive processes in semantic memory? Memory, 3, 409-433.
22. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11 194-201.
23. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations for word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
24. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Jennings, F. (1997). When leopards lose their spots: Knowledge of visual properties in category-specific deficits for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 901-950.
25. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., Durant-Peatfield, M., & Bunn, E. M. (1998). Two eyes of a see-through: Impaired and intact semantic knowledge in a case of selective deficit for living things. Neurocase, 4, 291-310.
26. Papagno, C., & Muggia, S. (1999). Naming people ignoring semantics in a patient with left frontal damage. Cortex, 35, 537-548.
27. Ratcliff, G., & Newcombe, F. (1982). Object recognition: Some deductions from the clinical evidence. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions (pp. 147-171). London: Academic Press.
28. Rogers, T. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2002). Connectionist perspectives on category-specific deficits. In E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 251-289). New York: Psychology Press.
29. Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1994). Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective - a tutorial review. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and non-conscious information processing (pp. 507-536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Shuren, J. S., Geldmacher, D., & Heilman, K. M. (1993). Nonoptic aphasia: Aphasia with preserved confrontation naming in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 43, 1900-1907.
31. Silveri, M. C., Gainotti, G., Perani, D., Cappelletti, J. Y., Carbone, G., & Fazio, F. (1997). Naming deficit for non-living items: Neuropsychological and PET study. Neuropsychologia, 35, 359-367.
32. Sommer, R. (1891). Ein seltener Fall von Sprachstörung. Würzburg, Germany: Habilitationsschrift.
33. Störring, G. (1900). Vorlesungen über Psychopathologie in ihrer Bedeutung für die normale Psychologie mit Einschluβ der psychologischen Grundlagen der Erkenntnistheorie. Leipzig, Germany: Wilhelm Engelmann.
34. Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (1997). Functional properties of concepts: Studies of normal and braindamaged patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 511-545.
35. Visch-Brink, E., Hagelstein, M., Middelkoop, H. A. M., & van der Cammen, T. M. J. (2004). Naming and semantic processing in Alzheimer's dementia: A coherent picture? Brain and Language, 91, 11-12.
36. Warrington, E. K. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 635-657.
37. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1983). Category-specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859-878.
38. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. A. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110 1273-1296.
39. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
40. Wolff, G. (1897). Über krankhafte Dissoziation der Vorstellungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 15, 1-71.
41. Wolff, G. (1904). Klinische und kritische Beiträge zur Lehre von den Sprachstörungen. Leipzig, Germany: Veit & Comp.