Prediction of functional loss in glaucoma from progressive optic disc damage

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 127, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1250-1256

  Medeiros, Felipe A ^a   Alencar, Luciana M ^a   Zangwill, Linda M ^a   Bowd, Christopher ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE COURSE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK ANOMALY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 70350707844     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.276     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363(9422): 1711-1720.
2. Jonas JB, Budde WM, Panda-Jonas S. Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43(4):293-320. (Pubitemid 29070417)
3. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, Pablo LE, Armas-Domingue K, Rodriguez de la Vega R, Ferreras A, Gonzalez de la Rosa M. Structure-function relationship depends on glaucoma severity. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009.
4. Racette L, Medeiros FA, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. The impact of the perimetric measurement scale, sample composition, and statistical method on the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2007; 16(8):676-684. (Pubitemid 350307628)
5. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Liebmann JR, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN. The relationship between structural and functional alterations in glaucoma: a review. Semin Ophthalmol. 2000;15(4):221-233.
6. Gardiner SK, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Evaluation of the structure-function relationship in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(10):3712-3717.
7. Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Smith EL III, Crawford ML. Scaling the structure - function relationship for clinical perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83 (4):448-455. (Pubitemid 41086700)
8. Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL. The glaucoma research community and FDA look to the future: a report from the NEI/FDA CDER Glaucoma Clinical Trial Design and Endpoints Symposium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(4):1497-1505.
9. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Zangwill LM, et al. The relationship between intraocular pressure and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(6):1125.e1-3-1133.e1-3
10. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714-720, discussion 829-830.
11. Anderson DR; Normal Tension Glaucoma Study. Collaborative normal tension glaucoma study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003;14(2):86-90.
12. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):701-713, discussion 829-830.
13. Miglior S, Zeyen T, Pfeiffer N, Cunha-Vaz J, Torri V, Adamsons I; European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group. Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(3):366-375.
14. Lalezary M, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, et al. Baseline optical coherence tomography predicts the development of glaucomatous change in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(4):576-582.
15. Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, et al. Validation of a predictive model to estimate the risk of conversion from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(10):1351-1360.
16. Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Beiser JA, et al. Baseline topographic optic disc measurements are associated with the development of primary open-angle glaucoma: the Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy Ancillary Study to the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(9):1188-1197.
17. Mohammadi K, Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with scanning laser polarimetry predict glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(4): 592-601. (Pubitemid 39420487)
18. Alencar LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Medeiros FA. Comparison of HRT-3 glaucoma probability score and subjective stereophotograph assessment for prediction of progression in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):1898-1906.
19. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Vasile C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Agreement between stereophotographic and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy measurements of cup/disc ratio: effect on a predictive model for glaucoma development. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(2):209-214. (Pubitemid 46673354)
20. Gordon MO, Torri V, Miglior S, et al; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group; European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group. Validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):10-19.
21. Andersen PK. Repeated assessment of risk factors in survival analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1(3):297-315.
22. Feuer EJ, Hankey BF, Gaynor JJ, Wesley MN, Baker SG, Meyer JS. Graphical representation of survival curves associated with a binary non-reversible time dependent covariate. Stat Med. 1992;11(4):455-474.
23. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Aihara M, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness as a risk factor for visual field loss in patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(5):805-813. (Pubitemid 37330022)
24. Miglior S, Pfeiffer N, Torri V, Zeyen T, Cunha-Vaz J, Adamsons I; European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) Group. Predictive factors for open-angle glaucoma among patients with ocular hypertension in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):3-9.
25. O'Quigley J, Xu R, Stare J. Explained randomness in proportional hazards models. Stat Med. 2005;24(3):479-489. (Pubitemid 40227659)
26. Royston P. Explained variation for survival models. Stata J. 2006;6(1):83-96.
27. Hougaard P. Frailty models for survival data. Lifetime Data Anal. 1995;1(3):255-273.
28. Drance SM. The Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study and some of its lessons. Can J Ophthalmol. 1999;34(1):1-6.
29. Katz J, Congdon N, Friedman DS. Methodological variations in estimating apparent progressive visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(9):1137-1142. (Pubitemid 29428821)
30. McKean-Cowdin R, Varma R, Wu J, Hays RD, Azen SP; Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):1013-1023.
31. Rein DB, Wittenborn JS, Lee PP, et al. The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(5):823-832.
32. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Use of progressive glaucomatous optic disk change as the reference standard for evaluation of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139(6):1010-1018.
33. Medeiros FA, Ng D, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. The effects of study design and spectrum bias on the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(1):214-222. (Pubitemid 47251405)
34. Medeiros FA, Vizzeri G, Zangwill LM, Alencar LM, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer and optic disc imaging for diagnosing glaucoma in patients suspected of having the disease. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(8):1340-1346.
35. Chauhan BC, Nicolela MT, Artes PH. Incidence and rates of visual field progression after longitudinally measured optic disc change in glaucoma [published online June 4, 2009]. Ophthalmology. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04. 031.
36. Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL; The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature, III: how to use an article about a diagnostic test, B: what are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA. 1994;271(9):703-707. (Pubitemid 24061707)
37. Jampel HD, Friedman D, Quigley H, et al. Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(1):39-44, e1.
38. Parrish RK II, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, et al; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Test-retest reproducibility of optic disk deterioration detected from stereophotographs by masked graders. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140 (4):762-764.
39. Medeiros FA, Alencar LM, Zangwill LM, et al. Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(4):1675-1681.
40. Fayers T, Strouthidis NG, Garway-Heath DF. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):1973-1980. (Pubitemid 350016360)