Patient-centered care and preference-sensitive decision making

JAMA

Volumn 302, Issue 16, 2009, Pages 1805-1806

  Keirns, Carla C ^a,b,c,d   Goold, Susan Dorr ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC PATIENT; DISABILITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; NOTE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; STANDARD; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UNITED STATES;

DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INSURANCE, HEALTH; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 70350704615     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1550     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Heisler M, Tierney E, Ackermann RT, et al. Physicians participatory decision-making and quality of diabetes care processes and outcomes: results from the triad study. Chronic Illn. 2009;5(3):165-176.
2. Pine M, Jordan HS, Elixhauser A, et al. Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality. JAMA. 2007;297(1):71-76. (Pubitemid 46041728)
3. Wharam JF, Paasche-Orlow MK, Farber NJ, et al. High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(7):854-859.
4. Wynia MK. The risks of rewards in health care: how pay-for-performance could threaten, or bolster, medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(7):884-887.
5. Parchman ML, Pugh JA, Romero RL, Bowers KW. Competing demands or clinical inertia: the case of elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(3):196-201. (Pubitemid 46889995)
6. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C, Fried LP, Boult L, Wu AW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716-724. (Pubitemid 41159291)
7. Michaels C, McEwen MM, McArthur DB. Saying "no" to professional recommendations: client values, beliefs, and evidence-based practice. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):585-589.
8. Goff SL, Mazor KM, Meterko V, Dodd K, Sabin J. Patients' beliefs and preferences regarding doctors' medication recommendations. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(3):236-241.
9. Schneider JW, Conrad P. Having Epilepsy: the Experience and Control of Illness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 1983.
10. Krein SL, Hofer TP, Kerr EA, Hayward RA. Whom should we profile? examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(5):1159-1180.