A note on the comparison of particle number counters

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2009, Pages

  Giechaskiel, Barouch ^a   Stilianakis, Nikolaos I ^a,b  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Calibration; Limits of agreement; Linear regression; Method comparison; Precision

Indexed keywords

LINEAR REGRESSION; MEASUREMENT THEORY; MEASUREMENTS;

ACCURACY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; METHOD COMPARISON; PARTICLE NUMBERS; PRECISION; STATISTICAL APPROACH; TWO PARTICLES;

CALIBRATION;

EID: 70350686857     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/7/077003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Regulations No. 83 Emissions of M1 and N1 categories of vehicles (http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs81-100.html)
2. Ayers G P 2001 Comment on regression analysis of air quality data Atmos. Environ. 35 2423-5
3. Zervas E and Dorlhène P 2007 Comparison of exhaust particle number measured by EEPS, CPC, and ELPI Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40 977-84
4. Andersson J, Giechaskiel B, Munoz-Bueno R, Sandbach E and Dilara P 2007 Particle measurement programme (PMP): light-duty inter-laboratory correlation exercise (ILCE-LD) Final Report (EUR 22775 EN) GRPE-54-08-Rev.1 (http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29grpe/grpeinf54.html)
5. Giechaskiel B, Dilara P, Sandbach E and Andersson J 2008 Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: comparison of different particle number measurement systems Meas. Sci. Technol. 19 095401
6. Global Technical Regulation No. 4 2007 Test procedure for compression-ignition (C.I.) engines and positive ignition (P.I.) engines fuelled with natural gas (NG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) with regard to the emission of pollutants http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/ wp29registry/ECE-TRANS-180a4e.pdf
7. Altman D G and Bland J M 1983 Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies Statistician 32 307-17
8. Giechaskiel B, Martinez-Lozano P, Alessandrini S, Forni F, Montigny F, Fumagalli I, Carriero M and Martini G 2008 Particle measurement programme (PMP) heavy duty (HD) inter-laboratory exercise: validation exercise tests at JRC (Feb 08) EU Report 23496
9. Bland J M and Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307-10
10. Bland J M and Altman D G 2003 Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 22 85-93
11. Berry W D 1993 Understanding Regression Assumptions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage) Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-092
12. Berkson J 1950 Are there two regressions? Am Stat. Assoc. J. 45 164-80
13. Miles J and Shevlin M 2001 Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers (Newbury Park, CA: Sage)
14. Linnet K 1993 Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies Clin. Chem. 39 424-32
15. Bland J M and Altman D G 1999 Measuring agreement in method comparison studies Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8 135-60
16. Bland J M and Altman D G 1995 Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading Lancet 346 1085-7
17. Eksborg S 1981 Evaluation of method-comparison data Clin. Chem. 27 1311-2
18. Bland M 2000 An Introduction to Medical Statistics 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)