|
Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 256-260
|
A comparison of three cervical immobilization devices
|
Author keywords
Cervical; Immobilization; Prehospital; Range of motion
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CERVICAL SPINE;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEVICE;
EMERGENCY CARE;
FEMALE;
GONIOMETRY;
HUMAN;
IMMOBILIZATION;
LABORATORY TEST;
MALE;
MORPHOMETRICS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANGE OF MOTION;
SPINAL CORD INJURY;
SPINE MOBILITY;
SPINE STABILIZATION;
SUPINE POSITION;
VOLUNTEER;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTHROMETRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE;
JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS;
SPINAL CORD INJURIES;
STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;
ADULT;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTHROMETRY, ARTICULAR;
CERVICAL VERTEBRAE;
EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;
SPINAL CORD INJURIES;
|
EID: 70350676809
PISSN: 10903127
EISSN: 15450066
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/10903120802706195 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (10)
|