Why do we need doctoral study in design?

International Journal of Design

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 71-79

  Davis, Meredith ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design education; Design knowledge; Design research; Doctoral education; PhD in design; Research education

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350648790     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Australian Institute of Architects. (2008). Research policy. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from the Australian Institute of Architects Web site: http://www.architecture.com.au/i-cms?page=542
2. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
3. Canada Foundation for Innovation. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_Foundation_for_Innovation
4. Dubberly, H. (2008). Toward a model of innovation. Interactions, 15(1), pp. 28-36.
5. Fisher, G. (2002). Beyond couch potatoes: From consumers to designers and active contributors. First Monday, 7(12). Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/issue/view/152
6. Greenfield, A. (2006). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
7. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
8. Jones, J. C. (1970). Design methods: Seeds of human futures. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
9. Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
10. Manfra, L. (2005, August/September). School survey 2005: Research-Its role in North American design education. Metropolis, 132-136. Retrieved April 20, 2008, from http://www.metropolismag.com/cda/story.php?artid=1502
11. Nardi, B., & Kapetlinin, V. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Nyquist, J., & Wulff, D. H. (2000). Recommendations from national studies on doctoral education. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://www.grad.washington.edu/envision/project_resources/national_recommend.html
13. Sanders, E. B.-N. (2006). Scaffolds for building everyday creativity. In J. Frascara (Ed.), Designing effective communications: Creating contexts for clarity and meaning (pp. 65-77). New York: Allworth Press.
14. Carnegie Foundation. (2005). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education: Basic classification technical details. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp?key=798
15. Tunstall, E. (2008, January 11). A presentation at the College of Design. North Carolina State University.