Evaluation of formulas for the appraisal of urban trees in municipalities of Chile;Avaliação de fórmulas para valoração econômica de árvores urbanas em municípios do Chile

Scientia Forestalis/Forest Sciences

Volumn , Issue 83, 2009, Pages 321-329

  Ponce Donoso, Mauricio ^a   Moya, Leonor ^a   Bustos Letelier, Oscar ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE TALCA   (Chile)

Author keywords

Chilean municipalities; Tree loss; Tree taxation; Tree value; Urban trees

Indexed keywords

CHILEAN MUNICIPALITIES; TREE LOSS; TREE TAXATION; TREE VALUE; URBAN TREES;

LAW ENFORCEMENT; MAINTENANCE; MICA; SILICATE MINERALS; TAXATION;

FORESTRY;

CHILE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; LEGISLATION; MAINTENANCE; MICA; SILICATES; TAXES; TREES;

EID: 70350647574     PISSN: 14139324     EISSN: 14139324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. AEJP - ASOCIACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE JARDINES Y ESPACIOS PÚBLICOS. Norma Granada: método para valoración de árboles y arbustos ornamentales. 3.ed. Granada, 2007. 53p.
2. CABALLER, V. Valoración de árboles. Madrid: Mundi-Prensa, 1999. 247p.
3. CARTER, J. The potential of urban forestry in developing countries: a concept paper. Rome: FAO, 1993. 32p.
4. CHILE. MINISTERIO DEL INTERIOR. SUBSECRETARÍA DE DESARROLLO REGIONAL Y ADMINISTRATIVO. Ley No 18.695 Orgánica Constitucional de Municipalidades; texto actualizado. Santiago, 2004. 78p. Available in: http://www.subdere.gov.cl/1510/articles-65813-recurso-1.doc. Consulted in October 12th 2007.
5. CHUECA, J. La Norma de Granada: un método de valoración económica de los árboles ornamentales. 2001. Available in: www.drac.com/pers/chueca/Granada.htm. Consulted in October 20th 2007.
6. CONAF - CORPORACIÓN NACIONAL FORESTAL. Programa de silvicultura urbana de Conaf: Documento interno. Santiago, s.d. 12p.
7. CULLEN, S. Tree appraisal: can depreciation factors be rated greater than 100%. Journal of Arboriculture, Champaign, v.28, n.3, p.153-158, 2002.
8. FAO - FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION. Urban and peri-urban forestry sub-programme: strategic framework for the biennium 2002-2003 and mid term 2002-2007 - part of Forestry Department Mid Term Plan 2002-2007. Rome: Forest Conservation, Research and Education Service, 2002. 44p.
9. FORREST, M. Trees in European cities: a historical review. In: DUNNE, L. (Ed.) Biodiversity in the city. Dublin: Environmental Institute, University Collage Dublin, 2002. p.15-20.
10. KONIJNENDIJK, C.; KJELL, N.; RANDRUP, T.; SCHIPPERIJN, J. Urban forest and trees. Amsterdam: Springer Verlag, 2005. 520p.
11. KONIJNENDIJK, C.; SYAKA, S.; RANDRUP, T.; SCHIPPERIJN, J. Urban and peri-Urban forestry in the development context: strategic and implementation. Journal of Arboriculture, Champaign, v.30, n.5, p.269-276, 2004.
12. LEAL, L.; BIONDI, D.; ROCHADELLI, R. Investments on urban trees in the city of Curitiba: an approach based on the land income theory. Scientia Forestalis, Piracicaba, v.36, n.78, p.141-149, 2008.
13. MOOTER, D.; HARRELL, M.; ALLINSON, R.; MURROW, J. Landscape tree appraisal. Lincoln: University of Nebraska, 2004. 4p.
14. MUNICIPALIDAD DE TALCA. Costos de mantención de especies arbóreas urbanas. Talca: Departamento de Aseo y Ornato, 2006.
15. PIEDRAHITA, P. Valoración del arbolado urbano. 2007. 64p. Tesis (Ing. Agrónomo). Universidad de la Republica del Uruguay, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Montevideo, 2007.
16. PIEDRAHITA, P.; PONCE-DONOSO, M. Valoración del arbolado urbano: fórmulas usadas en Chile. In: SIMPOSIO DE HORTICULTURA, 2, Talca, 2007. Anais... Talca: Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad de Talca, 2007. 24p.
17. POLIET, S.; JONES, N.; GARCÍA-MARÍN, G.; GARCÍA-VALDECANTOS, J-L.; RIVIERE, L.; VIDAL-BEAUDET, L.; BODSON, M.; RAUNDRUP, T. Tree establishment practice in towns and cities: results from a European survey. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, Dragoer, v.1, p.83-96, 2002.
18. PONCE-DONOSO, M.; PIEDRAHITA, P. Valoración del arbolado urbano. Situación en 28 comunas de Chile. (In referee). 2008.
19. PRICE, C. Quantifying the aesthetic benefits of urban forestry. Urban Forest and Urban Green, Dragoer, v.1, p.123-133, 2003.
20. SÁNCHEZ, J. Algunas consideraciones sobre el árbol en el diseño urbano. 2003. Available in: www.arbolesornamentales.com/ Arbolurbano.htm. Consulted in May 27th 2007.
21. TYRVÄINEN, L. Use and valuation of urban forest amenities in Finland. Journal of Environment and Management, New York, v.62, p.75-92, 2001.
22. TYRVÄINEN L.; SILVENNOINAN, H.; KOLEHMAINEN, O. Ecological an aesthetics values in urban forest management. Urban Forest and Urban Green, Dragoer, v.1, n.3, p.135-149, 2003.
23. WATSON, G. Comparing formula methods of tree appraisal. Journal of Arboriculture, Champaign, v.28, n.1, p.11-18, 2002.
24. WENGER, K. (Ed.). Forestry handbook. Washington: Wiley Interscience, 1984. p.887-983.
25. WOLF, L. Economía y valor público de los bosques urbanos. Revista de Agricultura Urbana, n.13, p.32-35, 2005.