A comparison model for agile web frameworks

EATIS 2008 - Proceedings of the 2008 Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Fernández Villamor, José Ignacio ^a   Díaz Casillas, Laura ^a   Iglesias, Carlos Á ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Agile web development; Grails; Rails; Roma; Trails; Web frameworks

Indexed keywords

AGILE WEB DEVELOPMENT; GRAILS; ROMA; TRAILS; WEB FRAMEWORKS;

CORUNDUM; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RUBY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS;

EID: 70350647301     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1621087.1621101     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. K. Bergner, A. Rausch, M. Sihling, and T. Ternité. DoSAM - Domain-Specific Software Architecture Comparison Model. In Quality of Software Architectures and Software Quality, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 4-20. Spring Verlag, 2005.
2. P. Clemens, R. Kazman, and M. Klein. Evaluating Software Architectures, Methods and Case studies. SEI Series in Software Engineering, 2002.
3. E. Evans. Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Addison Wesley, 2003.
4. L. Garulli. Roma framework's web page. http://www.romaframework.org, 2006.
5. C. Hibbs. JRuby's killer feature. http://www.oreillynet.com/ruby/blog/ 2006/11/jrubys-killer-feature.html, 2006.
6. Interface21 Inc. Acegi Security's web page. http://www.acegisecurity.org/ , 2007.
7. Jakarta. Tapestry web page. http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry, 2006.
8. R. Johnson. J2EE development frameworks. Computer, 38(1):107-110, 2005.
9. JPOX Team. JPOX's web page. http://www.jpox.org, 2008.
10. R. Kazman, L. Bass, G. Abowd, and M. Webb. SAAM: A method for analyzing the properties software architectures. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 81-90, May 1994.
11. R. Kazman, M. Klein, M. Barbacci, H. Lipson, T. Longstaff, and S. Carrière. The architecture tradeoff analysis method. Proceedings of ICECCS, August 1998.
12. D. Koenig, A. Glover, P. King, G. Laforge, and J. Skeet. Groovy in Action. Manning publications Co., 2007.
13. X. Kong, L. Liu, and D. Lowe. Separation of concerns: a web application architecture framework. Journal of Digital Information, 6(2), 2005.
14. K. Korhonen. Trails framework's web page. http://www.trailsframework.org, 2006.
15. A. Leff and J. T. Rayfield. Web-application development using the model/view/controller design pattern. Fifth IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2001.
16. Naked Objects. Naked Objects's web page. http://www.nakedobjects.org, 2007.
17. OWASP Foundation. The ten most critical web application security vulnerabilities. http://www.owasp.org/images/e/e8/OWASP-Top-10-2007.pdf, 2007.
18. Red Hat. Hibernate's web page. http://www.hibernate.org, 2006.
19. J. Rudolph. Getting started with Grails. InfoQ - Enterprise Software Development Series, 2007.
20. T. C. Shan and W. W. Hua. Taxonomy of java web application frameworks. In ICEBE '06: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, pages 378-385, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society.
21. SpringSource. Spring framework's web page. http://www.springframework. org, 2006.
22. C. Stoermer, F. Bachmann, and C. Verhoef. SACAM: The software architecture comparison analysis method. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2003-TR-006, Carnegie Mellon University - Software Engineering Institute, 2003.
23. D. Thomas, C. Fowler, and A. Hunt. Programming Ruby: The Pragmatic Programmer's Guide. The Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2004.
24. D. Thomas, D. Heinemeier Hansson, L. Breedt, M. Clark, J. Duncan Davidson, J. Gehtland, and J. Schwarz. Agile Web Development with Rails. The Pragmatic Bookshelf, 2nd edition, 2006.