Seismic microzonation of Bangalore, India

Journal of Earth System Science

Volumn 117, Issue SUPPL.2, 2008, Pages 833-852

  Anbazhagan, P ^a   Sitharam, T G ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Ground response analysis; Liquefactions; MASW; Microzonation; Seismic hazard; Site characterization; SPT

Indexed keywords

GROUND MOTION; LIQUEFACTION; MICROTREMOR; ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; PENETRATION TEST; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC ZONE; SITE CHARACTERIZATION; SITE EFFECT; STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY; TECTONIC SETTING; ZONATION;

ASIA; BANGALORE; EURASIA; INDIA; KARNATAKA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 70350646842     PISSN: 02534126     EISSN: 02534126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-008-0071-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aki K and Richards P G 1980 Quantitative Seismology; Freeman and Co., New York.
2. Atkinson G M and Boore D M 1995 Ground-motion Relations for Eastern North America; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85(1)17-30.
3. Bansal B K and Vandana C 2007 Microzonation Studies in India: DST initiatives; Proceedings of Workshop on Microzonation, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 1-6.
4. Boore D M 1983 Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 73 1865-1894.
5. Boore D M 2003 Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method; Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 635-675.
6. Bullen K E 1965 An introduction to the theory of seismology; Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
7. Cetin K O, Seed R B, Kiureghian A D, Tokimatsu K, Harder L F Jr., Kayen R E and Moss R E S 2004 Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential; Jou nal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 121314-1340.
8. Dobry R, Borcherdt R D, Crouse C B, Idriss I M, Joyner W B, Martin G R, Power M S, Rinne E E and Seed R B 2000 New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions; Earthquake Spectra 16 41-67.
9. Ganesha Raj K and Nijagunappa R 2004 Major Lineaments of Karnataka State and their Relation to Seismicity; Remote Sensing Based Analysis, J. Geol. Soc. India 63430-439.
10. GovindaRaju L, Ramana G V, HanumanthaRao C and Sitharam T G 2004 Site specific ground response analysis, Special section; Geotechnics and Earthquake Hazards, Curr. Sci. 87(10) 1354-1362.
11. Heaton, Tajima T F and Mori A W 1986 Estimating Ground motions using recorded Accelerograms; Surveys in Geophysics 8 25-83.
12. Hwang H and Huo J R 1997 Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States; Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 16 363-372.
13. Idriss I M and Boulanger R W. 2004 Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes; Proc. 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, and 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (eds) Doolin D et al, Stallion Press, 1 32-56.
14. Idriss I M and Sun J I 1992 User's Manual for SHAKE91; Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA, 12.
15. nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amster- dam 57-72.
16. Iyengar R N and Raghukanth S T G 2004 Attenuation of Strong Ground Motion in Peninsular India; Seismological Research Letters 75(4) 530-540.
17. 30 mapping and soil classification for seismic site effect evaluation in Dinar region, SW Turkey; Geophysics J. Int. 165 223-235.
18. Nakamura Y 1989 Earthquake Alarm System for Japan Railways; Japanese Railway Engineering 28(4) 3-7.
19. Pearce J T and Baldwin J N 2005 Liquefaction Susceptibility Mapping ST. Louis, Missouri and Illinois - Final Technical Report; Published in web.er.usgs.gov/reports/abstract/2003/cu/03HQGR0029.pdf.
20. Regulatory Guide 1.165 1997 Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion; Published by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, USNRC, March 1997.
21. Schnabel P B 1973 Effects of Local Geology and Distance from Source on Earthquake Ground Motion; Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California.
22. Schnabel P B, Lysmer J and Seed H Bolton 1972 SHAKE: A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analy- sis of Horizontally Layered Sites; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley: Report No. UCB/EERC-72/12: 102.
23. Seed H B and Idriss I M 1971 Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential; Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE 97(9) 1249-1274.
24. Seed H B and Idriss I M 1970 Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analyses; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California, Rep. No. EERC-70/10.
25. Seed H B, Idriss I M and Arango I. 1983 Evaluation of Liquefaction potential Using Field Performance Data; J. Geotech. Engg. 9(3) 458482.
26. Seed H B, Tokimatsu K, Harder L F and Chung R M 1985 The influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 111(12) 1425-1445.
27. SEISAT 2000 Seismotectonic Atlas of India; Published by Geological Survey of India.
28. Sitharam T G and Anbazhagan P 2007 Seismic Hazard Analysis for the Bangalore Region; Natural Hazards 40 261-278.
29. Sitharam T G, Anbazhagan P and Ganesha Raj K 2006 Use of remote sensing and seismotectonic parameters for seismic hazard analysis of Bangalore; Natural Hazards Earth System Sci. 6 927-939.
30. Sitharam T G, Anbazhagan P and Mahesh G U 2007 Liquefaction Hazard Mapping using SPT Data; Indian Geotechnical Journal 37(3) 210-226.
31. Sitharam T G, Srinivasa Murthy B R and Aravind Kolge 2001 A Post-Mortem of the Collapse of Structures in Ahmedabad during the Bhuj Earthquake; Proceedings, Indian Geotechnical Conference I 344-347.
32. TC4-ISSMGE 1999 Manual for Zonation on Seismic Geotechnical Hazard; Revised edition, Technical Commit- tee for Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (TC4) of the International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE), 209.
33. Tripathi J N and Ugalde A 2004 Regional estimation of Q from seismic coda observations by the Gauribidanur seismic array (southern India); Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 145 115-126.
34. Wells D L and Coppersmith K J 1994 New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement; Bull. Seis- mol. Soc. Am. 84 975-1002.
35. Xia J, Miller R D and Park C B 1999 Estimation of near- surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh wave; Geophysics 64(3) 691-700.
36. Youd T L, Idriss I M, Andrus R D, Arango I, Castro G, Christian J T, Dobry R, Liam Finn W D, Harder Jr. L H, Hynes M E, Ishihara K, Koester J P, Liao S S C, Marcuson W F, Marting G R, Mitchell J K, Moriwaki Y, Power M S, Robertson P K, Seed R B and Stokoe K H 2001 Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils; Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 127(10)817-833.