Compensation of errors due to discretization, domain truncation and unknown contact impedances in electrical impedance tomography

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2009, Pages

  Nissinen, A ^a   Heikkinen, L M ^a   Kolehmainen, V ^a   Kaipio, J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Contact impedance; Electrical impedance tomography; Modelling errors; Statistical inversion

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ELECTRIC CONTACTS; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; TOMOGRAPHY;

APPROXIMATION ERRORS; BAYESIAN APPROACHES; CONTACT IMPEDANCE; ELECTRICAL IMPE DANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT); ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MODELLING ERROR; NUMERICAL DISCRETIZATION; STATISTICAL INVERSION;

ERRORS;

EID: 70350645563     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/10/105504     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arridge S R, Kaipio J P, Kolehmainen V, Schweiger M, Somersalo E, Tarvainen T and Vauhkonen M 2006 Approximation errors and model reduction with an application in optical diffusion tomography Inverse Problems 22 175-95
2. Aykroyd R G and Cattle B A 2007 A boundary-element approach for the complete-electrode model of EIT illustrated using simulated and real data Inverse Problems Sci. Eng. 15 441-61
3. Boone K G and Holder D S 1996 Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 34 351-4
4. Brown B H 2003 Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 27 97-108
5. Cheney M, Isaacson D and Newell J C 1999 Electrical impedance tomography SIAM Rev. 41 85-101
6. Cheng K-S, Isaacson D, Newell J C and Gisser D G 1989 Electrode models for electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 918-24
7. Heikkinen L M, Vilhunen T, West R M and Vauhkonen M 2002 Simultaneous reconstruction of electrode contact impedances and internal electrical properties: II. Laboratory experiments Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1855-61 (Pubitemid 36225157)
8. Heikkinen L M, Kourunen J, Savolainen T, Vauhkonen P J, Kaipio J P and Vauhkonen M 2006 Real time three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography applied in multiphase flow imaging Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 2083-7
9. Heino J, Somersalo E and Kaipio J P 2005 Compensation for geometric mismodelling by anisotropies in optical tomography Opt. Express 13 296-308
10. Heino J and Somersalo E 2004 A modeling error approach for the estimation of optical absorption in the presence of anisotropies Phys. Med. Biol. 49 4785-98
11. Huttunen J M J and Kaipio J P 2007 Approximation errors in nonstationary inverse problems Inverse Problems Imaging 1 77-93
12. Huttunen J M J and Kaipio J P 2007 Approximation error analysis in nonlinear state estimation with an application to state-space identification Inverse Problems 23 2141-57
13. Huttunen J M J and Pikkarainen H-K 2007 Discretization error in dynamical inverse problems: one-dimensional model case J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl. 15 365-86
14. Kaipio J P and Somersalo E 2004 Statistical and computational inverse problems Applied Mathematical Sciences vol 160 (New York: Springer)
15. Kaipio J P, Kolehmainen V, Somersalo E and Vauhkonen M 2000 Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 16 1487-522
16. Kaipio J P and Somersalo E 2006 Statistical inverse problems: discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes J. Comput. Appl. Math. 198 493-504
17. Kolehmainen V, Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen P A and Kaipio J P 1997 Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns Physiol. Meas. 18 289-303
18. Kolehmainen V, Lassas M and Ola P 2008 Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 27 1404-14
19. Kourunen J, Käyhkö R, Matula J, Käyhkö J, Vauhkonen M and Heikkinen L M 2008 Imaging of mixing of two miscible liquids using electrical impedance tomography and linear impedance sensor Flow Meas. Instrum. 19 391-6
20. Kourunen J, Savolainen T, Lehikoinen A, Vauhkonen M and Heikkinen L M 2009 Suitability of a PXI platform for an electrical impedance tomography system Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 015503
21. Lehikoinen A, Finsterle S, Voutilainen A, Heikkinen L M, Vauhkonen M and Kaipio J P 2006 Approximation errors and truncation of computational domains with application to geophysical tomography Inverse Problems Imaging 1 371-89
22. McEwan A, Cusick G and Holder D S 2007 A review of errors in multi-frequency EIT instrumentation Physiol. Meas. 28 S197-215
23. Nissinen A, Heikkinen L M and Kaipio J P 2008 The Bayesian approximation error approach for electrical impedance tomography-experimental results Meas. Sci. Technol. 19 015501
24. Pursiainen S 2006 Two-stage reconstruction of a circular anomaly in electrical impedance tomography Inverse Problems 22 1689-703
25. Somersalo E, Cheney M and Isaacson D 1992 Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52 1023-40
26. Vauhkonen P J, Vauhkonen M, Savolainen T and Kaipio J P 1999 Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46 1150-60
27. Vauhkonen P J, Vauhkonen M and Kaipio J P 2000 Errors due to the truncation of the computational domain in static three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography Physiol. Meas. 21 125-35
28. Vilhunen T, Kaipio J P, Vauhkonen P J, Savolainen T and Vauhkonen M 2002 Simultaneous reconstruction of electrode contact impedances and internal electrical properties: I. Theory Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1848-54 (Pubitemid 36225156)