From spatial-continuous electrical resistivity measurements to the soil hydraulic functioning at the field scale

Comptes Rendus - Geoscience

Volumn 341, Issue 10-11, 2009, Pages 859-867

  Cousin, Isabelle ^a   Besson, Arlène ^a,b   Bourennane, Hocine ^a   Pasquier, Catherine ^a   Nicoullaud, Bernard ^a   King, Dominique ^a   Richard, Guy ^a  

^a Centre de recherche d'Orléans   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

DC geophysical method; Digital soil functioning mapping; Field scale; Soil water content; Soil water potential

Indexed keywords

DATA INTERPRETATION; ELECTRICAL METHOD; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; FIELD METHOD; HYDRAULICS; LABORATORY METHOD; MAPPING; OVERLAND FLOW; SOIL WATER POTENTIAL; SPATIAL VARIATION; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION; WATER CONTENT;

EID: 70350619354     PISSN: 16310713     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crte.2009.07.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Archie G.E. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Petroleum Engineers 146 (1942) 54-62
2. Besson A, I. Cousin, H. Bourennane, B. Nicoullaud, C. Pasquier, G. Richard, A. Dorigny, D. King, The spatial and temporal organisation of soil water at the field scale as described by electrical resistivity measurements, European Journal of Soil Science (2008) submitted.
3. Bourennane H., Dère C., Lamy I., Cornu S., Baize D., van Oort F., and King D. Enhancing spatial estimates of metal pollutants in raw wastewater irrigated fields using a topsoil organic carbon map predicted from aerial photography. Science of the Total Environment 361 (2006) 229-248
4. Bourennane H., and King D. Using multiple external drifts to estimate a soil variable. Geoderma 114 (2003) 1-18
5. Bourennane H., King D., Chéry P., and Bruand A. Improving the kriging of a soil variable using slope gradient as external drift. European Journal of Soil Science 47 (1996) 473-483
6. Bourennane H., King D., Couturier A., Nicoullaud B., Mary B., and Richard G. Uncertainty assessment of soil water content spatial patterns using geostatistical simulations: an empirical comparison of a simulation accounting for single attribute and a simulation accounting for secondary information. Ecological Modelling 205 (2007) 323-335
7. Chaplot V., Walter C., Curmi P., and Hollier-Larousse A. The use of auxiliary geophysical data to improve a soil-landscape model. Soil Science 12 (2000) 961-970
8. Dabas M., Tabbagh A., and Boisgontier D. Multi-depth continuous electrical profiling for characterization of in-field variability. 3rd European Conference On Precision Agriculture. June 18th-21st 2001, Montpellier, France (2001)
9. FAO, World Reference Base for Soil Resources, Rome (2006).
10. Friedman S.P. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46 (2005) 45-70
11. Inman D.J., Freeland R.S., Ammons J.T., and Yoder R.E. Soil investigations using electromagnetic induction and ground penetrating radar in Southwest Tennessee. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66 1 (2002) 206-211
12. Keller G.V., and Frischknecht F.C. Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting (1966), Pergamon Press, Oxford
13. Klute A. Water retention: Laboratory methods. In: Klute A. (Ed). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. second ed. Agron. Monogr. 9 ASA and SSSA (1986), Madison WI 635-662
14. Loke M.H. Time-lapse resistivity imaging inversion. 5th Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Society European. Sept. 6-9 1999, Budapest, Hungary (1999)
15. Loke M.H., and Barker R.D. Rapid least square inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 44 (1996) 131-152
16. D. Michot, Intérêt de la géophysique de subsurface et de la télédétection multispectrale pour la cartographie des sols et le suivi de leur fonctionnement hydrique à l'échelle parcellaire, Thèse Univ. P. & M. Curie, 2003. 404 p.
17. Mueller T.G., and Pierce F.J. Soil carbon maps: enhancing spatial estimates with simple terrain attributes at multiple scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67 (2003) 258-267
18. Odeh I.O.A., Mc Bratney A., and Chittleborough D.J. Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma 67 (1995) 215-226
19. S. Ould Mohamed, Etude du fonctionnement hydrique hivernal d'un sol limono-argileux de Petite Beauce. Application d'un modèle d'infiltration et incidence sur la lixiviation du nitrate, Thèse, Univ. d'Orléans France,1995.
20. Panissod C., Dabas M., Jolivet A., and Tabbagh A. A novel mobile multipole system (MUCEP) for shallow (0-3m) geoelectrical investigation: the 'Vol-de-canards' array. Geophysical Prospecting 45 (1997) 983-1002
21. Sheets K.R., and Hendrickx J.M.H. Non invasive soil water content measurement using electromagnetic induction. Water Resources Research 31 10 (1995) 2401-2409
22. van Genuchten M.Th. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44 (1980) 892-898
23. Yang C., and Anderson G.L. Airborne videography to identify spatial plant growth variability in grain sorghum. Precision Agriculture 1 (1999) 67-79
24. Zhang R., Shouse P., and Yates S. Use of pseudo-crossvariograms and cokriging to improve estimates of soil solute concentrations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61 (1997) 1342-1347