Evolutionary multi-objective quantum control experiments with the covariance matrix adaptation

Proceedings of the 11th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO-2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 659-666

  Shir, Ofer M ^a   Roslund, Jonathan ^a   Rabitz, Herschel ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental multi objective optimization; Laser pulse shaping; MO CMA ES; Multi observable quantum control

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE GAUSSIAN NOISE; APPLICATION DOMAINS; COVARIANCE MATRIX ADAPTATION; CURRENT MODELING; CUTTING EDGES; EMERGING TOPICS; EVOLUTION STRATEGIES; EXPERIMENTAL MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; EXPERIMENTAL PROBLEMS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTIPLE OBJECTIVES; PARETO FRONT; PARETO SET; QUANTUM CONTROL; QUANTUM PHENOMENA; REAL-WORLD; SIMULATED SYSTEM; SPHERE MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY; ULTRAFAST LASER;

COVARIANCE MATRIX; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); HEALTH; LASER PULSES; LASERS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARETO PRINCIPLE; PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY; PULSE SHAPING CIRCUITS; PULSED LASER APPLICATIONS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 70350616413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1569901.1569992     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. I, λ)-ES in a Noisy Environment. In W. Martin and W. Spears, editors, Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, 6, pages 127-141, San Francisco, CA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann.
2. D. V. Arnold and H.-G. Beyer. Local performance of the (1 + 1)-ES in a noisy environment. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 6(1):30-41, 2002.
3. A. Bartelt et al. Assuring robustness to noise in optimal quantum control experiments. Phys. Rev. A, 71(6):063806, June 2005.
4. L. Bonacina et al. Multiobjective genetic approach for optimal control of photoinduced processes. Phys. Rev. A, 76(2):023408, Aug 2007.
5. D. Büche et al. Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for the Optimization of Noisy Combustion Processes. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on, 32(4):460-473, Nov. 2002.
6. R. Chakrabarti, R. Wu, and H. Rabitz. Quantum Pareto optimal control. Phys. Rev. A, 78(3):033414, Sep 2008.
7. C. K. Goh and K. C. Tan. An Investigation on Noisy Environments in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 11(3):354-381, 2007.
8. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies. Evolutionary Computation, 9(2):159-195, 2001.
9. E. Hughes. Evolutionary multi-objective ranking with uncertainty and noise. In Proceedings of EMO-2001, pages 329-343, London, UK, 2001. Springer-Verlag.
10. C. Igel, N. Hansen, and S. Roth. Covariance Matrix Adaptation for Multi-Objective Optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 15(1):1-28, 2007.
11. H. Rabitz et al. Whither the Future of Controlling Quantum Phenomena? Science, 288:824-828, May 2000.
12. O. M. Shir et al. On the diversity of multiple optimal controls for quantum systems. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 41(7), 2008.
13. O. M. Shir et al. The Application of Evolutionary Multi-Criteria Optimization to Dynamic Molecular Alignment. In Proceedings of IEEE-CEC-2007, pages 4108-4115. IEEE Computational Intelligence Society, 2007.
14. O. M. Shir et al. Performance Analysis of Derandomized Evolution Strategies in Quantum Control Experiments. In Proceedings of GECCO-2008, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM Press.
15. D. A. van Veldhuizen and G. B. Lamont. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Analyzing the state-of-the-art. Evolutionary Computation, 8(2):125-147, 2000.