Finding most vital node by node importance contribution matrix in communication networks

Beijing Hangkong Hangtian Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1076-1079

  Zhao, Yihuan ^a   Wang, Zulin ^a   Zheng, Jing ^a   Guo, Xujing ^a  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Betweenness; Communication network; Degree; Most vital node; Topology

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCIES; BETWEENNESS; COMMUNICATION NETWORK; COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DEGREE; EVALUATION METHOD; MATRIX; MOST VITAL NODE; NET TOPOLOGY; NODE IMPORTANCE;

TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 70350611261     PISSN: 10015965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Corley H W, Sha D Y. Most vital links and nodes in weighted networks[J]. Oper Res Letters, 1982(1): 157-160
2. Guo Wei. Reliability evaluation method of tactical communication network[J]. Journal of Electronics, 2000, 28(1): 3-6 (in Chinese)
3. Chen Yong, Hu Aiqun, Hu Xiao, Evaluation method for node importance in communication networks[J]. Journal of China Institute of Communications, 2004, 25(8): 129-134 (in Chinese)
4. Wu Jun, Tan Yuejin. Finding the most vital node by node contraction in communication networks[C]//Communications, Circuits and Systems, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference. 2005, 2: 1282-1286
5. Yu Xin, Li Yanhe, Zheng Xiaoping, et al. Node importance evaluation based on communication network performance grads[J]. J Tsinghua Univ: Sci & Tech, 2008, 48(4): 541-544(in Chinese)
6. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi A L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks[J]. Nature, 2000, 406: 378-382