Behavior recognition in video with extended models of feature velocity dynamics

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-09-04, Issue , 2009, Pages 56-61

  Messing, Ross ^a   Pal, Christopher ^a,b  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; BEHAVIOR RECOGNITION; EXTENDED MODEL; FEATURE VELOCITY; HIGHER RESOLUTION; HUMAN PERCEPTION; LOCAL FEATURE; LOCAL SPACES; LONG RANGE; LONG TERM; NONLOCAL; SPATIOTEMPORAL INFORMATION; STATE-OF-THE-ART APPROACH; STATISTICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; TIME FEATURES;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 70350608439     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Baker, S., and Matthews, I. 2004. Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework. IJCV 56(3):221 -255.
2. Bilmes, J. 1997. A gentle tutorial on the EM algorithm. Technical Report ICSI-TR-97-021, University of Berkeley.
3. Birchfield, S. 1996. Kit: An implementation of thekanade-lucas-tomasi feature tracker.
4. Blei, D. M.; Ng, A. Y.; and Jordan, M. I. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:993-1022.
5. Dollar, P.; Rabaud, V.; Cottrell, G.; and Belongie, S. 2005. Behavior recognition via sparse spatio-temporal features. In VS-PETS.
6. Fergus, R.; Perona, P.; and Zisserman, A. 2003. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, 264-271.
7. Johansson, G. 1973. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psy-chophysics 14:201 -211.
8. Ke, Y, and Sukthankar, R. 2004. Pea-sift: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In CVPR04, 11:506-513.
9. Lowe, D. G. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2):91-110.
10. Lucas, B. D, and Kanade, T. 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In IJCAI, 674-679.
11. Madabhushi, A., and Aggarwal, J. K. 1999. A bayesian approach to human activity recognition. In VS '99: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Visual SurVeillance, 25. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Niebles, J. C, and Fei-Fei, L. 2007. A hierarchical model model of shape and appearance for human action classification. In IEEE CVPR.
13. Niebles, J. C; Wang, H.; and Fei-Fei, L. 2006. Unsupervised learning of human action categories using spatial-temporal words. In BMVC.
14. Ramanan, D., and Forsyth, D. A. 2003. Automatic annotation of everyday movements. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS)
15. Rosales, R., and Sclaroff, S. 1999. Trajectory guided tracking and recognition of actions. Technical report, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
16. Savarese, S.; Pozo, A. D.; Niebles, J. C; and Fei-Fei, L. 2008. Spatial-temporal correlations for unsupervised action classification. In IEEE Workshop on Motion and Video Computing.
17. Schuldt, C; Laptev, I.; and Caputo, B. 2004. Recognizing human actions: A local svm approach. In ICPR, 32-36.
18. Wong, S.-E; Kim, T.-K.; and Cipolla, R. 2007. Learning motion categories using both semantic and structural information. In CVPR.