Effects of task performance and task complexity on the validity of computational models of attention

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 172-176

  De Koning, Lisette ^a   Van Maanen, Peter Paul ^a,b   Van Dongen, Kees ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMBINED MODEL; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; GAZE BEHAVIOR; TASK COMPLEXITY; TASK INFORMATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK-BASED; THREE MODELS; VALIDATION METHODOLOGIES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ERGONOMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY;

EID: 70350605434     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bosse, T., Maanen, P.-P. van, Treur, J., Simulation and Formal Analysis of Visual Attention, Journal of Web Intelligence and Agent Systems (WIAS), IOS Press, 2008.
2. Chalmers, B. A., Webb, R. D, G., & Keeble, R. (2002). Modeling shipboard tactical picture compilation. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. Volume 2, Sunnyvale, CA, International Society of Information Fusion, pp. 1292-1299
3. Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Human-Computer studies, 58, 697-718.
4. Grootjen, M., & Neerincx, M. (2005). Operator load management during task execution in process control. Human Factors Impact on Ship Design, Genoa.
5. Just, M., & Carpenter, P. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441-480.
6. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ.
7. Maanen, P.-P. van, Koning, L. de, Dongen, K. van (2007). Design and Validation of HABTA: Human Attention-Based Task Allocator, In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Human Aspects in Ambient Intelligence, Darmstadt, Germany, to be published by Springer.
8. Ouerhani, N., Von Wartburg, R., Hügli, H., & Müri, R. (2004). Emperical Validation of the saliency-based Model of Visual Attention. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis, 3 (1), 13-14.
9. Parasuraman & Riley (1997). Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, and Abuse. Human Factors, 39 (2), 230-253.
10. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'03).
11. Salvucci, D. D. (2000). A model of eye movements and visual attention. Third International Conference on Cognitive modeling, pp. 252-259.
12. Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285-1293.
13. Treisman & Gelade (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
14. Verkuijlen, R. P. M., Muller, T. J. (2007). Action speed tactical trainer review. Technical report, TNO Human Factors.
15. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R, Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention, 63-102. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16. Wickens, C. D., & McCarley, J. S. (2007). Applied attention theory. CRC Press.
17. Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: definition of construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82.
18. Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Doom, L. V. (1985). The Construction of a Scale to Measure Perceived Effort. Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.