Understanding effects of feedback on group collaboration

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-09-04, Issue , 2009, Pages 25-30

  Kim, Taemie ^a   Pentland, Alex ^a  

^a MIT MEDIA LAB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO-LOCATED; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; DISTRIBUTED COLLABORATION; DISTRIBUTED GROUPS; GROUP COLLABORATION; GROUP DYNAMICS; INTERACTIVITY LEVEL; LEVEL CHARACTERISTIC; REAL-TIME FEEDBACK; SMALL GROUPS; SOCIAL SIGNALS; SOCIOMETRIC SENSORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING;

SENSORS;

EID: 70350597703     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bergstrom, T., and Karahalios, K. 2007. Conversation clock: Visualizing audio patterns in co-located groups. In Proceedings of the Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences, 78. IEEE.
2. Tanzeem Choudhury and Alex Pentland 2003. Sensing and Modeling Human Networks using the Sociometer In Proceedings of International Symposium of Wearable Computing IEEE.
3. DiMicco, J. M.; Hollenbach, K.; Pandolfo, A.; and Bender, W. 2007. The impact of increased awareness while face-to-face. Special Issue on Awareness Systems Design, Human-Computer Interaction 22(1).
4. Jayagopi, D.B; Hung, H.;Yeo, C; and Gatica-Perez D. 2009. Modeling Dominance in Group Conversations from Nonverbal Activity Cues In Trans, on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Special Issue on Multimodal Processing for Speech-based Interactions. IEEE.
5. Kim, T.; Chang, A.; Holland, L.; and Pentland, A. 2008. Meeting mediator: Enhancing group collaboration and leadership with sociometric feedback. In Proceedings of the conference on Computer supported Cooperative Work. ACM.
6. Kim, T.; Brdiczka, O.; Chu, M.; and Begole, B. 2009. Predicting shoppers' interest from social interactions using sociometric sensors. In Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in Computing. (Under Review).
7. Mark, G.; Grudin, J.; and Poltrock, S. 1999. Meeting at the desktop: an empirical study of virtually co-located teams. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 159-178.
8. Olguin Olguin, D.; Waber, B.; Kim, T.; Mohan, A.; Ara, K.;and Pentland, A. 2009. Sensible organizations: Technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B: Cybernetics.
9. Pentland, A. 2008. Honest Signals: How They Shape Our World. MIT Press.
10. Romano, N.C. J., and Nunamaker, J. 2002. Meeting analysis: findings from research and practice. In Proceedings of System Sciences. IEEE Press.
11. Shaw, M. 1976. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. McGraw-Hill.
12. Smith, E. E., and Kight, S. S. 1959. Effects of feedback on insight and problem solving efficiency in training groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 43:209-11.
13. Streitz, A.; Geissler, J.; Haake, J.; and J., H. 1994. Dolphin: Integrated meeting support across liveboards, local and remote desktop environments. In Proceedings of the conference on Computer supported Cooperative Work, 345-358. ACM.
14. Tang, J.; Yankelovich, N.; Begole, J.; Kleek, M.; Li, E; and Bhalodia, J. 2001. Connexus to awarenex: Extending awareness to mobile users. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, 221-228. ACM.
15. Wilson, D.S. T. J., and Miller, R. 2004. Cognitive cooperation: when the going gets tough, think as a group. Human NatureZ 15(3):225-250.