Stimulus-hand correspondence and direct response activation: An electromyographic analysis

Psychophysiology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1160-1169

  Hasbroucq, Thierry ^a   Burle, Boris ^a   Vidal, Franck ^a   PossamaÏ, Camille Aime ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

Dual route processing; Incorrect activation; Reaction time; Simon effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350596447     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00865.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anzola, G. P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H. A. Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple factors in simple choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295 302.
2. Bashore, T. R. (1981). Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 352 368.
3. Brebner, J. (1973). S-R compatibility and changes in RT with practice. Acta Psychologica, 37, 93 106.
4. Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M. Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324 336.
5. Burle, B., Roger, C., Allain, S., Vidal, F. Hasbroucq, T. (2008). Error negativity does not reflect conflict: A re-appraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1637 1655.
6. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W. Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of continuous flow of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529 552.
7. Craft, J. L. Simon, J. R. (1970). Processing symbolic information from a visual display: Interference from an irrelevant directional cue? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 415 420.
8. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C. Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731 750.
9. Eimer, M., Hommel, B. Prinz, W. (1995). S-R compatibility and response selection. Acta Psychologica, 90, 301 313.
10. Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R. O'Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165 168.
11. Hasbroucq, T., Burle, B., Akamatsu, A., Vidal, F. Possamaï, C.-A. (2001). An electromyographic investigation of the effect of stimulus-response mapping on choice reaction time. Psychophysiology, 38, 157 162.
12. Hasbroucq, T, Kornblum, S. Osman, A. (1988). A new look at reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. CPC: European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 207 221.
13. Hasbroucq, T., Possamaï, C.-A., Bonnet, M. Vidal, F. (1999). The effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in man. Psychophysiology, 36, 522 526.
14. Hedge, A. Marsh, N. W. A. (1975). The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondence on two-choice response time. Acta Psychologica, 39, 427 439.
15. Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P. Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117 143). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
16. Hodges, P.W Bui, B. H. (1996). A comparison of computer-based methods for determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 101, 511 519.
17. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130 135.
18. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility. A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253 270.
19. Poffenberger, A. T. (1912). Reaction time to retinal stimulation with special reference to the time lost in conduction nerve centers. Archives of Psychology, XXI (23), 1 73.
20. Proctor, R. W., Lu, C.-H., Wang, H. Dutta, A. (1995). Activation of response codes by relevant and irrelevant stimulus information. Acta Psychologica, 90, 275 286.
21. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In W. Prinz B. Hommel (Eds.), Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action. Attention & Performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 494 519). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
22. Rösler, F. Finger, T. (1993). A psychophysiological analysis of response channel activation and outcome states in Eriksen's noise compatibility task. Psychological Research, 55, 20 28.
23. Roswarski, T. E. Proctor, R. W. (2003a). The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67, 43 55.
24. Roswarski, T. E. Proctor, R. W. (2003b). Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect: Comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 152 158.
25. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of a directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31 88). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
26. Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V. Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 197 202.
27. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G. Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 74, 169 201.
28. Staude, F., Flachenecker, C., Daumer, M. Wolf, W. (2001). Onset detection in surface electromyographic signals: A systematic comparison of methods. EURASIP Journal of Applied Signal Processing, 2, 67 81.
29. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Schröter, H., Soetens, E. Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345 1363.
30. Van Boxtel, G. J. M., Geraats, L. H. D., Van den Berg-Lenssen, M. M. C. Brunia, C. H. M. (1993). Detection of EMG onset in LRP research. Psychophysiology, 30, 405 412.
31. Wallace, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354 360.
32. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T. Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731 751.
33. Wiegand, K. Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence; Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453 464.
34. Winer, B. J. (1970). Statistical principles in experimental design. London : McGraw-Hill.
35. Yelott, J. L. (1971). Correction for guessing and the speed-accuracy trade-off in choice reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 159 199.
36. Zhang, J. Kornblum, S. (1997). Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1543 1551.