A synergy of planning and ontology concept ranking for semantic web service composition

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5290 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 42-51

  Hatzi, Ourania ^a   Meditskos, Georgios ^b   Vrakas, Dimitris ^b   Bassiliades, Nick ^b   Anagnostopoulos, Dimosthenis ^a   Vlahavas, Ioannis ^b  

^a HAROKOPIO UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Ontology concept ranking; Planning; Semantic matching relaxation; Semantic web service composition

Indexed keywords

DESCRIPTION LOGIC; DOMAIN-INDEPENDENT PLANNING; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; LEVEL OF RELAXATION; ONTOLOGY CONCEPT RANKING; ONTOLOGY CONCEPTS; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; RANKING ALGORITHM; REASONER; SEMANTIC MATCHING; SEMANTIC MATCHING RELAXATION; SEMANTIC WEB SERVICE COMPOSITION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA DESCRIPTION; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTICS; WEB SERVICES;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 70350596334     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88309-8_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. JPlan: Java Graphplan Implementation, http://sourceforge.net/projects/ jplan
2. Blum, A.L., Furst, M.L.: Fast Planning Through Planning Graph Analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90, 281-300 (1997)
3. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Wu, D., Hendler, J., Nau, D.: HTN planning for web service composition using SHOP2. Journal of Web Semantics 1(4), 377-396 (2004)
4. Klusch, M., Gerber, A., Schmidt, M.: Semantic Web Service Composition Planning with OWLS-XPlan. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Semantic Web and Agents, USA (2005)
5. Martinez, E., Lesperance, Y.: Web service composition as a planning task: Experiments using knowledge-based planning. In: Proceedings of the ICAPS 2004 Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Web and Grid Services, pp. 62-69 (2004)
6. Pistore, M., Marconi, A., Bertoli, P., Traverso, P.: Automated Composition of Web Services by Planning at the Knowledge Level. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), Edinburgh, UK (August 2005)
7. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: A Practical OWL DL Reasoner. J. Web Semantics (2007)
8. OWLS-TC version 2.2 revision 1, http://projects.semwebcentral.org/ projects/owls-tc/
9. Fikes, R., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189-208 (1971)
10. Ghallab, M., Howe, A., Knoblock, C., McDermott, D., Ram, A., Veloso, M., Weld, D., Wilkins, D.: PDDL - the Planning Domain Definition Language. Technical report, Yale University, New Haven, CT (1998)
11. OWL-S 1.1 Release, http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/
12. WSDL-S, http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSDL-S/
13. Paolucci, M., Kawmura, T., Payne, T., Sycara, K.: Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities. In: First International Semantic Web Conference (2002)
14. Semantic Annotations for WSDL, http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/
15. Booth, D., et al.: Web Services Architecture. W3C Working Draft (August 2003), http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/
16. The OWL API, http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/