Cognitive load measurement from user's linguistic speech features for adaptive interaction design

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5726 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2009, Pages 485-489

  Khawaja, M Asif ^a,b   Chen, Fang ^a,b   Owen, Christine ^c   Hickey, Gregory ^c  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bushfire management; Cognitive load; Interaction design; Language usage; Linguistic features; Measurement; Word categories

Indexed keywords

BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENT; COGNITIVE LOAD; INTERACTION DESIGN; LANGUAGE USAGE; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; WORD CATEGORIES; BUSHFIRE MANAGEMENTS; COGNITIVE LOADS;

DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LINGUISTICS; USER INTERFACES; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; MEASUREMENTS; SPEECH;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 70350577038     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_54     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: a review of recent progress. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-task performance, pp. 279-328. Taylor and Francis, London (1991)
2. Ark, W., et al.: The Emotion Mouse. In: Bullinger, Ziegler. (eds.) HCI: Ergonomics and User Interfaces 1, vol. 1, pp. 818-823. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., London (1999)
3. Windell, D., Wiebe, E.N.: A Comparison of Two Mental Workload Instruments in Multimedia Instruction. In: Proc. HFES 2006. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Press, Santa Monica (2006)
4. Yin, B., Chen, F., Ruiz, N., Ambikairajah, E.: Speech-based Cognitive Load Monitoring System. In: Proc. ICASSP 2008, pp. 2041-2044. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2008)
5. Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8(4), 293-332 (1991)
6. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., et al.: Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 63-71 (2003)
7. Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
8. Berthold, A., Jameson, A.: Interpreting Symptoms of Cognitive Load in Speech Input. In: User Modeling 1999. Springer, Wien (1999)
9. Khawaja, M.A., Ruiz, N., Chen, F.: Potential Speech Features for Cognitive Load Measurement. In: Proc. OzCHI 2007. ACM Press, New York (2007)
10. Muller, C., et al.: Recognizing time pressure and cognitive load on the basis of speech: An experimental study. In: Proc. 8th International Conf. User Modeling, pp. 24-33 (2001)
11. Sexton, J., Helmreich, R.: Analyzing Cockpit Communication: The links between language, performance, error, and workload. University of Texas Team Research Project, Austin, USA (2000)
12. Stirman, S.W., Pennebaker, J.W.: Word Use in the Poetry of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Poets. In: Psychosomatic Medicine, vol. 63. American Psychosomatic Society Press (2001)
13. Kramer, A., Oh, L.M., Fussell, S.R.: Using Linguistic Features to Measure Presence in Computer-Mediated Communication. In: Proc. CHI 2006. ACM Press, New York (2006)
14. Australasian Fire Authorities Council, The Australasian Inter-service Incident Management System (AIIMS), AFAC Limited, 3rd edn. (2005), http://www.afac.com.au
15. Transana, University of Wisconsin-Madison Center for Education Research, http://www.transana.org
16. Pennebaker, J.W., et al.: The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC 2007 (2007), http://www.liwc.net