A rule-based modeling for the description of flexible and self-healing business processes

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5739 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 15-27

  Boukhebouze, Mohamed ^a   Amghar, Youssef ^a   Benharkat, Aïcha Nabila ^a   Maamar, Zakaria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b ZAYED UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Business processes modeling; Business rules; Change impact and self healing of business process; Flexible modeling

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

BUSINESS LOGIC; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS RULES; FLEXIBLE MODEL; MODELING PROCESS; RULE-BASED MODELS; SELF HEALING MECHANISM; SELF-HEALING;

AGILE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS;

EID: 70350576997     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03973-7_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: Compliant and flexible business process with business rules. In: 7th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development and Support (BPMDS 2006) at CAiSE 2006, pp. 94-104 (2006)
2. The Business Rules Group, Defining Business Rules, What are they really (July 2000), http://www.businessrulesgroup.org
3. OASIS: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL4WS): Version 2.0. In BPEL4WS specification report (2007)
4. Lu, R., Sadiq, S.: A Survey of Comparative Business Process Modeling Approaches. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4439, pp. 82-94. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
5. Regev, G., Soffer, P., Schmidt, R.: Taxonomy of Flexibility in Business Processes. In: Seventh Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support In conjunction with CAiSE 2006 (2006)
6. Ganek, A.G., Corbi, T.A.: The dawning of the autonomic computing era. Technical report, IBM
7. Giurca, A., Lukichev, S., Wagner, G.: Modeling Web Services with URML. In: Proceedings of Workshop Semantics for Business Process Management 2006 (SBPM 2006), Budva, Montenegro, June 11 (2006)
8. Wagner, G.: Rule Modeling and Markup. In: Eisinger, N., Maluszynski, J. (eds.) Reasoning Web. LNCS, vol. 3564, pp. 251-274. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
9. Object Management Group, Object Constraint Language (OCL) (2003), http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/03-10-14.pdf
10. Goedertier, S., Vanthienen, J.: Designing compliant business processes with obligations and permissions. In: Eder, Dustdar, pp. 5-14 (2006)
11. Schroeder, M., Wagner, G.: Languages for Business Rules on the Semantic Web. In: Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Rule Markup, Italy, June 2002, vol. 60. CEUR-WS Publication (2002)
12. Knolmayer, G., Endl, R., Pfahrer, M.: Modeling Processes and Workflows by Business Rules. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 16-29. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
13. Müller, R., Greiner, U., Rahm, E.: AgentWork: a Workflow System Supporting Rule-Based' Workflow Adaptation. Data & Knowledge Engineering 51(2), 223-256 (2004)
14. Zeng, L., Ngu, A., Benatallah, B., O'Dell, M.: An Agent-Based Approach for Supporting Cross-Enterprise Workflows. In: Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Database Conference, ADC 2001 (2001)