A systematic review of domain analysis tools

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-13

  Lisboa, Liana Barachisio ^a   Garcia, Vinicius Cardoso ^a,b,d   Lucrédio, Daniel ^a,c   de Almeida, Eduardo Santana ^a,e   de Lemos Meira, Silvio Romero ^a,b   de Mattos Fortes, Renata Pontin ^c  

^a Reuse in Software Engineering   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Domain analysis; Systematic review; Tools

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN ANALYSIS; DOMAIN ENGINEERING; NEW TOOLS; PROCESS SUPPORT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOOL SUPPORT;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 70350572315     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.05.001     Document Type: Review

References (72)

1. Krueger C.W. Software reuse. ACM Computing Surveys 24 2 (1992) 131-183
2. Frakes W.B., and Isoda S. Success factors of systematic reuse. IEEE Software 11 5 (1994) 14-19
3. Biggerstaff T.J. An assessment and analysis of software reuse. Advances in Computers 34 (1992) 1-57
4. L. Bass, P. Clements, S.G. Cohen, L. Northrop, J. Withey, Product line practice workshop report, Tech. Rep., Technical Report CMU/SEI-97-TR-003, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1997.
5. G. Succi, J. Yip, E. Liu, Analysis of the essential requirements for a domain analysis tool, in: ICSE 2000 Workshop on Software Product Lines: Economics, Architectures and Implications, 2000.
6. Moon M., Yeom K., and Chae H.S. An approach to developing domain requirements as a core asset based on commonality and variability analysis in a product line. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 7 (2005) 551-569
7. Czarnecki K., and Eisenecker U. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications (2000), Addison-Wesley
8. J. Neighbors, Software construction using components, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, US, 1981.
9. Prieto-Dfaz R. Domain analysis: an introduction. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 15 2 (1990) 47-54
10. Frakes W.B., Prieto-Diaz R., and Fox C.J. Dare: domain analysis and reuse environment. Annals of Software Engineering 5 (1998) 125-141
11. Weiss D., and Lai C.T.R. Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process (1999), Addison-Wesley
12. Bayer J., Flege O., Knauber P., Laqua R., Muthig D., Schimd K., Widen T., and DeBaud J.-M. Pulse: a methodology to develop software product lines. Symposium on Software Reusability (1999), ACM Press, Los Angeles, California, United States 122-131
13. M. Kim, H. Yang, S. Park, A domain analysis method for software product lines based on scenarios, goals and features, in: Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), Thailand, 2003, pp. 126-136.
14. H. Mei, W. Zhang, F. Gu, A feature oriented approach to modeling and reusing requirements of software product lines, in: International Conference on Computer Software and Applications (COMPSAC), IEEE Computer Society, USA, 2003, pp. 250-256.
15. E.S. Almeida, J.C.C.P. Mascena, A.P.C. Cavalcanti, A. Alvaro, V.C. Garcia, S.R.L. Meira, D. LucrTdio, The domain analysis concept revisited: a practical approach, in: M. Morisio (Ed.), International Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR), Turin, Italy, 2006, pp. 43-57.
16. D. LucrTdio, R.P.M. Fortes, E.S. Almeida, S.R.L. Meira, Performing domain analysis for model-driven software reuse, in: 10th International Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Beijing, China, Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp. 200-211.
17. Arango G. Domain analysis methods. In: Horwood E. (Ed). Software Reusability (1994), Chichester, England 17-49
18. H. Gomaa, M.E. Shin, Tool support for software variability management and product derivation in software product lines, in: Workshop on Software Variability Management for Product Derivation, Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), Boston, USA, 2004, pp. 73-84.
19. R. Capilla, A. Sánchez, J.C. Dueñas, An analysis of variability modeling and management tools for product line development, in: Software and Service Variability Management Workshop - Concepts, Models, and Tools, Helsinki, Finland, 2007, pp. 32-47.
20. Sinnema M., and Deelstra S. Classifying variability modeling techniques. Information and Software Technology 49 (2007) 717-739
21. B.A. Kitchenham, S. Charters, Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering, Tech. Rep. EBSE-2007-01, Keele University, EBSE Technical Report, 2007.
22. G.H. Travassos, J. Biolchini, Systematic review applied to software engineering, in: Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering (SBES) - Tutorials, Jopo Pessoa, Brazil, 2007, p. 436.
23. Brereton P., Kitchenham B.A., Budgen D., Turner M., and Khalil M. Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80 (2007) 571-583
24. M.H. Hamilton, 001: A full life cycle systems engineering and software development environment development before the fact in action, December 15, 2007, 1991. .
25. R.W. Krut, Jr., Integrating 001 tool support in the feature-oriented domain analysis methodology, Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-93-TR-11, ESC-TR-93-188, SEI, 1993.
26. Postech, ASADAL/FORM Tool, User guide, Software Engineering Laboratory, 08/02/2006, 2003.
27. Kim K., Kim H., Ahn M., Seo M., Chang Y., and Kang K.C. Asadal: a tool system for co-development of software and test environment based on product line engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSR) (2006), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 783-786
28. R. Prieto-Dfaz, W.B. Frakes, B. Gogia, Dare - a domain analysis and reuse environment, Tech. Rep., Reuse, Inc., August 1992.
29. W.B. Frakes, R. Prieto-Diaz, C. Fox, Dare-cots, a domain analysis support tool, in: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC'97), IEEE Computer Society, 1997, p. 73.
30. W.B. Frakes, Automating domain engineering, in: Workshop on Institutionalizing Software Reuse (WIRS), 1997.
31. P. Padmanabhan, Decimal: a requirements engineering tool for product families, Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, US, 2002.
32. Padmanabhan P., and Lutz R.R. Tool-supported verification of product line requirements. Automated Software Engineering 12 4 (2005) 447-465
33. Dehlinger J., Humphrey M., Suvorov L., Padmanabhan P., and Lutz R. Decimal and plfaultcat: from product-line requirements to product-line member software fault trees. Companion to the proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering (2007), IEEE Computer Society 49-50
34. W. Tracz, L. Coglianese, A DSSA domain analysis tool, Tech. Rep. ADAGE-LOR-94-13, Loral Federal System, Owego, US, 1995.
35. S. Buhne, K. Lauenroth, P. Klaus, Modelling requirements variability across product lines, in: IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 2005, pp. 41-52.
36. J. Park, M. Moon, K. Yeom, Dream: domain requirement asset manager in product lines, in: International Symposium on Future Software Technology (ISFST), Xian, China, 2004.
37. Antkiewicz M., and Czarnecki K. Featureplugin: feature modeling plug-in for eclipse. OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange (2004), ACM Press, New York, NY, USA 67-72
38. Czarnecki K., Antkiewicz M., Kim C.H.P., Lau S., and Pietroszek K. fmp and fmp2rsm: eclipse plug-ins for modeling features using model templates. Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA) (2005), ACM, San Diego, CA, USA 200-201
39. Leich T., Apel S., Marnitz L., and Saake G. Tool support for feature-oriented software development: featureide: an eclipse-based approach. Proceedings of the 2005 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange (2005), ACM, San Diego, California 55-59
40. BigLever, Gears user's guide, Tech. Rep., BigLever, 2005.
41. C.W. Krueger, Software Mass Customization, Biglever, technical white paper ed., 13/04/2006, 2005.
42. Krueger C.W. Biglever software gears and the 3-tiered spl methodology. Object Oriented Programming Systems and Applications (OOPSLA) (2007), ACM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 844-845
43. G. Succi, A. Eberlein, J. Yip, K. Luc, M. Nguy, Y. Tan, The design of holmes: a tool for domain analysis and engineering, in: IEEE Pacific Rim Conference, Victoria, BC, Canada, 1999, pp. 365-368.
44. Succi G., Yip J., Liu E., and Pedrycz W. Holmes: a system to support software product lines. International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) (2000), ACM, Limerick, Ireland 786
45. G. Succi, W. Pedrycz, J. Yip, I. Kaytazov, Intelligent design of product lines in holmes, in: Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 1, Canada, 2001, pp. 75-80.
46. G. Succi, J. Yip, W. Pedrycz, Holmes: an intelligent system to support software product line development, in: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2001, pp. 829-830.
47. R.M.M. Braga, C. Werner, M. Mattoso, Odyssey: a reuse environment based on domain models, in: IEEE Symposium on Application-Specific Systems and Software Engineering and Technology (ASSET), Richardson, Texas, 1999, pp. 49-57.
48. R.M.M. Braga, Components search and retrieval in software reusable environments, Ph.D. Thesis, UFRJ - Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2000 (in Portuguese).
49. M. Eriksson, J. Börstler, K. Borg, The pluss approach - domain modeling with features, use cases and use case realizations, in: Software Product Lines Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3714, Rennes, France, 2005, pp. 33-44.
50. Eriksson M., Morast H., Borstler J., and Borg K. The pluss toolkit - extending telelogic doors and ibm-rational rose to support product line use case modeling. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (2005), ACM, Long Beach, CA, USA 300-304
51. M. Eriksson, H. Morast, J. Borstler, K. Borg, An empirical evaluation of the pluss toolkit, Tech. Rep. UMINF-06.31, Department of Computing Science, Umea University, 2006.
52. K. Schmid, M. Schank, Pulse-beat - a decision support tool for scoping product lines, in: Software Architectures for Product Families, International Workshop IW-SAPF-3, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 2000, pp. 65-75.
53. Beuche D., and Spinczyk O. Variant management for embedded software product lines with pure::consul and aspectc++. Companion of the 18th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (2003), ACM, Anaheim, CA, USA 108-109
54. Pure-systems, Variant Management with Pure::Variants, Pure-systems, 02/02/2006, 2004.
55. Spinczyk O., and Beuche D. Modeling and building software product lines with eclipse. Companion to the 19th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems Languages, and Applications (2004), ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada 18-19
56. T.V.D. Massen, H. Lichter, Requiline: a requirements engineering tool for software product lines, in: International Workshop on Product Family Engineering (PFE), Springer-Verlag, Siena, Italy, 2003, pp. 168-180.
57. RWTH-Aachen, The RequiLine User Manual, Germany, January 2005.
58. K.C. Kang, S.G. Cohen, J.A. Hess, W.E. Novak, A.S. Peterson, Feature-oriented domain analysis (foda) feasibility study, Tech. Rep. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
59. Kang K.C., Kim S., Lee J., Kim K., Shin E., and Huh M. Form: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures. Annals of Software Engineering 5 (1998) 143-168
60. Tracz W. DSSA (domain-specific software architecture): pedagogical example. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 20 3 (1995) 49-62
61. Pohl K., Bockle G., and van der Linden F. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques (2005), Springer-Verlag, New York
62. Succi G., Valerio A., Vernazza T., Fenaroli M., and Predonzani P. Framework extraction with domain analysis. ACM Computing Surveys (2000) 12.
63. Lee K., Kang K.C., Chae W., and Choi B.W. Feature-based approach to object-oriented engineering of applications for reuse. Software Practice and Experience 30 9 (2000) 1025-1046
64. C.W. Krueger, Data from soliton's software product line initiative, Tech. Rep. 2002-07-08-1, Biglever, US, 2002.
65. Bayer J., Muthig D., and Widen T. Customizable domain analysis. International Symposium on Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering (1999), Springer-Verlag 178-194
66. M. Jaring, J. Bosch, Representing variability in software product lines: a case study, in: Software Product Line Conference (SPLC), San Diego CA, 2002, pp. 15-36.
67. M. Steger, C. Tischer, B. Boss, A. Mnller, O. Pertler, W. Stolz, S. Ferber, Introducing pla at Bosch gasoline systems: experiences and practices, in: Software Product Lines (SPLC), Boston, MA, USA, 2004, pp. 34-50.
68. E.S. Almeida, A. Alvaro, V.C. Garcia, D. LucrTdio, R.P.M. Fortes, S.R.D.L. Meira, An experimental study in domain engineering, in: IEEE EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Component-Based Software Engineering Track, Lubeck, Germany, 2007, pp. 93-100.
69. Weiss D.M. Commonality analysis: a systematic process for defining families. Proceedings of the Second International ESPRIT ARES Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families (1998), Springer-Verlag, London, UK 214-222
70. E.S. Almeida, Ride: the rise process for domain engineering, Ph.D. Thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil, 2007.
71. Fuggetta A. A classification of case technology. Computer 26 12 (1993) 25-38
72. L.B. Lisboa, Toolday - a tool for domain analysis, Master's Thesis, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil, January 2009.