The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 201, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 477.e1-477.e7

  Cheng, Yvonne W ^a   Delaney, Shani S ^a   Hopkins, Linda M ^a   Caughey, Aaron B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

induction of labor; length of labor; perinatal complications

Indexed keywords

OXYTOCIN;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CAUCASIAN; CESAREAN SECTION; CHORIOAMNIONITIS; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FORCEPS DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HISPANIC; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR STAGE 1; LABOR STAGE 2; MATERNAL AGE; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NEWBORN DISEASE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NURSERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; PERINATAL PERIOD; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; LABOR, INDUCED; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 70350566006     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.024     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical management guidelines for obstetricians-gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG practice bulletin no. 19 (1999), The College, Washington, DC
2. Martin J.A., Hamilton B.E., Sutton P.D., Ventura S.J., Menacker F., and Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Report 55 (2006) 1-101
3. Roberts C.L., Taylor L., and Henderson-Smart D. Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of a change?. BJOG 106 (1999) 937-942
4. Cammu H., Martens G., Ruyssinck G., and Amy J.J. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 (2002) 240-244
5. Yeast J.D., Jones A., and Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 consecutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 (1999) 628-633
6. Vrouenraets E.P.F.M., Roumen F.J.M.E., Dehing C.J.G., van den Akker E.S.A., Aarts M.J.B., and Scheve E.J.T. Bishop score and risk of cesraen delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005) 690-697
7. Boulvain M., Marcoux S., Bureau M., Fortier M., and Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15 (2001) 131-139
8. Vahratian A., Zhang J., Troendle J.F., Sciscione A.C., and Hoffman M.K. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 105 (2005) 698-704
9. Bishop E.H. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol 24 (1964) 266-268
10. Grobman W.A., and Simon C. Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132 (2006) 163-166
11. Nuthalapaty F.S., Rouse D.J., and Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor induction and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 103 (2004) 452-456