Comparing visual and auditory presentation for the modification of interpretation bias

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 558-570

  Standage, Helen ^a   Ashwin, Chris ^a   Fox, Elaine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Causality; Cognitive bias modification; Interpretative bias

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; EMOTION; EXPERIMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPRETATION BIAS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOOD; OBSERVER BIAS; PREDICTION; TRAINING; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANXIETY; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COGNITION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350565376     PISSN: 00057916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2009.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Amir N., Weber J.G., Beard C., Bomyea J., and Taylor C. The effect of a single session attention modification program on response to a public speaking challenge in socially anxious individuals. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 117 4 (2008) 860-868
2. Anderson J.R., and Bower G.H. Human associative memory (1973), Winston, Washington, DC
3. Baddeley A.D., and Andrade J. Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology 129 (2000) 126-145
4. In: Baddeley A.D., and Hitch G.J.L. (Eds). Working memory Vol. 8 (1974), Academic Press, New York
5. Brewer M.B., and Weber J.G. Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (1994) 268-275
6. Brooks L.R. The suppression of visualization by reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (1967) 189-299
7. Brooks L.R. An extension of the conflict between visualisation and reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (1970) 91-96
8. Brower D. The experimental study of imagery. II. The relative predominance of various imagery modalities. Journal of General Psychology 37 (1947) 199-200
9. Ganis G., Thompson W.L., and Kosslyn S.M. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 20 (2004) 226-241
10. Gordijn E.H., and Stapel D.A. Behavioural effects of automatic interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. British Journal of Social Psychology 45 (2006) 717-729
11. Grey S., and Mathews A. Effects of training on interpretation of emotional ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A 4 (2000) 1143-1162
12. Hirsch C., Hayes S., and Mathews A. Looking on the bright side: accessing benign meanings reduces worry. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 118 1 (2009) 44-54
13. Hirsch C.R., Mathews A., and Clark D.M. Inducing an interpretation bias changes self-imagery: a preliminary investigation. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 (2007) 2173-2181
14. Holmes E.A., Lang T.J., and Shah D.M. Developing interpretation bias modification as a 'cognitive vaccine' for depressed mood - imagining positive events makes you feel better than thinking about them verbally. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 118 1 (2009) 76-88
15. Holmes E.A., and Mathews A. Mental imagery and emotion: a special relationship. Emotion 5 4 (2005) 489-497
16. Holmes E.A., Mathews A., Dalgleish T., and Mackintosh B. Positive interpretation training: effects of mental imagery versus verbal training on positive mood. Behaviour Therapy 37 (2006) 237-247
17. Intons-Peterson M.J. The role of loudness in auditory imagery. Memory and Cognition 8 5 (1980) 385-393
18. Kosslyn S.M., Thompson W.L., and Alpert N.M. Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: a positron emission tomography study. NeuroImage 6 (1997) 320-334
19. Mackintosh B., Mathews A., Yiend J., Ridgeway V., and Cook E. Induced biases in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behaviour Therapy 37 (2006) 209-222
20. MacLeod C., Rutherford E., Campbell L., Ebsworthy G., and Holker L. Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 111 1 (2002) 107-123
21. Mathews A., and Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 109 4 (2000) 602-615
22. Mathews A., Ridgeway V., and Cook E. Inducing a benign interpretation bias reduces trait anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 38 (2007) 225-236
23. Mayer R. Multimedia learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Murphy R., Hirsch C.R., Mathews A., Smith K., and Clark D.M. Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious population. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45 7 (2007) 1517-1529
25. Paivio A. Imagery and verbal processes (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
26. Paivio A. Mental representations: A dual coding approach (1986), Oxford University Press, New York
27. Paul G.L. Insight vs desensitization in psychotherapy (1966), Stanford University Press, Stanford California
28. Rapee R.M., and Lim L. Discrepancy between self and observer ratings of performance in social phobics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 101 4 (1992) 728-731
29. Salemink E., van den Hout M., and Kindt M. Trained biases in interpretation and anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy (2007)
30. Stern R.M., Ray W.J., and Quigley K.S. Psychophysiological recording (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
31. Stopa L., and Clark D.M. Cognitive processes in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy 31 (1993) 255-267
32. Tabbers, H. K., Martens, R. L., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. The modality effect in multimedia instructions. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society, Mahwah, NJ, 2001.
33. Unnava H.R., Agarwal S., and Haugtvedt C.P. Interactive effects of presentation modality and message-generated imagery on recall of advertising information. Journal of Consumer Research 23 (1996) 81-88
34. Watson D., and Friend R. Measurement of social evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Anxiety 33 (1969) 448-457
35. White K.D., Ashton R., and Brown M.D. The measurement of imagery vividness: normative data and their relationship to sex, age, and modality differences. British Journal of Psychology 68 2 (1977) 203-211
36. Wilson E., MacLeod C., Mathews A., and Rutherford E. The causal role of interpretative bias in anxiety reactivity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 115 1 (2006) 103-111