Use of large sample sizes and multiple evaluation methods in human-robot interaction experimentation

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-09-03, Issue , 2009, Pages 9-16

  Bethel, Cindy L ^a   Murphy, Robin R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; EVALUATION METHOD; HIGH FIDELITY; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTIONS; HUMAN STUDY; LESSONS LEARNED; MEDIUM EFFECT; MULTIPLE METHODS; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; SAMPLE SIZES; TASK PERFORMANCE;

MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOT PROGRAMMING; STATISTICS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 70350550105     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Bethel, C. L.; Salomon, K.; Burke, J. L.; and Murphy, R. R. 2007a. Psychophysiological experimental design for use in human-robot interaction studies. In The 2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS2007). Orlando, FL: IEEE.
2. Bethel, C. L.; Salomon, K.; Murphy, R. R.; and Burke, J. L. 2007b. Survey of psychophysiology measurements applied to human-robot interaction. In 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot & Human Interactive Communication.
3. Bethel, C. L, ; Bringes, C; and Murphy, R. R, 2009. Non-facial and non-verbal affective expression in appearance-constrained robots for use in victim management: Robots to the rescue! In 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2009).
4. Bethel, C, L.; Salomon, K.; and Murphy, R. R. 2009, Preliminary results: Humans find emotive non-anthropomorphic robots more calming. In 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2009).
5. Burke, J. L.; Murphy, R. R.; Riddle, D. R.; and Fincannon, T. 2004. Task performance metrics in human-robot interaction: Taking a systems approach. In Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems.
6. Dautenhahn, K.; Walters, M.; Woods, S.; Koay, K. L.; Nehaniv, C. L.; Sisbot, A.; Alami, R.; and Simeon, T. 2006. How may i serve you?: A robot companion approaching a seated person in a helping context. In 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2006), 172-179. Salt Lake City, UT: ACM Press, New York, NY, USA.
7. Elmes, D. G.; Kantowitz, B. H.; and Roediger III, H. L. 2006. Research Methods in Psychology. Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth, 8th edition.
8. Itoh, K.; Miwa, H.; Nukariya, Y.; Zecca, M.; Takanobu, H.; Roccella, S.; Carrozza, M. C; Dario, P.; and Atsuo, T. 2006. Development of a bioinstrumentation system in the interaction between a human and a robot. In International Conference of Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2620-2625. (Pubitemid 46928292)
9. Johnson, B., and Christensen, L. 2004. Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2nd edition.
10. Kidd, C. D., and Breazeal, C. 2005. Human-robot interaction experiments: Lessons learned. In Proceeding of AISB '05 Symposium Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, 141-142.
11. Kulić, D., and Croft, E. 2006. Physiological and subjective responses to articulated robot motion. Robotica Forthcoming:15.
12. Liu, C; Rani, P.; and Sarkar, N. 2006. Affective state recognition and adaptation in human-robot interaction: A design approach. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2006), 3099-3106.
13. Moshkina, L., and Arkin, R. C. 2005. Human perspective on affective robotic behavior: A longitudinal study. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005), 2443-2450.
14. Murphy, R. R.; Riddle, D.; and Rasmussen, E. 2004. Robot-assisted medical reachback: a survey of how medical personnel expect to interact with rescue robots. In 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2004), 301-306.
15. Mutlu, B, ; Hodgins, J, K.; and Forlizzi, J. 2006. A storytelling robot: Modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In 2006 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (HUMANOIDS'06). Genova, Italy: IEEE.
16. Olsen, D. R., and Goodrich, M. A, 2003. Metrics for evaluating human-robot interactions. In Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop.
17. Picard, R. W; Vyzas, E.; and Healey, J. 2001. Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23(10):1175-1191.
18. Rani, P.; Sarkar, N.; Smith, C. A.; and Kirby, L. D. 2004. Anxiety detecting robotic system - towards implicit human-robot collaboration. Robotica 22(1):85-95.
19. Riddle, D. R.; Murphy, R. R.; and Burke, J. L. 2005. Robot-assisted medical reachback: using shared visual information. In IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN 2005), 635-642. Nashville, TN: IEEE.
20. Steinfeld, A.; Fong, T.; Kaber, D.; Lewis, M.; Scholtz, J.; Schultz, A.; and Goodrich, M. 2006. Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA: ACM Press.
21. Stevens, J. P. 1999. Intermediate Statistics A Modern Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 2nd edition.
22. Watson, D.; Clark, L. A.; and Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6): 1063-1070.