Accuracy of high-resolution photogrammetric measurements of gullies with contrasting morphology

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 34, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 1915-1926

  Gimenez R ^a   Marzolff, I ^b   Campo, M A ^a   Seeger, M ^c   Ries, J B ^d   Casali J ^a   Alvarez Mozos J ^a  

^a PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Gully erosion; Gully morphology; Large scale aerial photograph; Photogrammetry; Sight shadow; Sun shadow

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY; DATA SETS; DIRECT MEASUREMENT; EXPERIMENTAL SETUP; FIELD MEASUREMENT; GROUND CONTROL; GULLY EROSION; GULLY MORPHOLOGY; HIGH RESOLUTION; IMAGE EVALUATION; INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS; LARGE SCALE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT SCALE; MEASURING EQUIPMENTS; NAVARRE; PHOTOGRAMMETRIC MEASUREMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRIC TECHNIQUE; PIXEL SIZE; REFERENCE DATA; SENSING TECHNIQUES; SHADOWING EFFECTS; SIGHT SHADOW; STUDY AREAS; STUDY SITES; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); TIME OF DAY; VEGETATION COVER;

IMAGE RESOLUTION; MEASUREMENTS; MORPHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUALITY CONTROL; REMOTE SENSING; ROCK MECHANICS; SUN; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH; GEOMORPHOLOGY; GULLY EROSION; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REMOTE SENSING;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NAVARRA; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

EID: 70350547573     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1868     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Álvarez-Mozos J. 2006. Evaluación de la aplicabilidad de la teledetección radar a la estimación de la humedad del suelo en cuencas agrícolas, PhD Thesis, Public University of Navarre, 339 pp.
2. Brasington J, Langham J, Rumsby B. 2003. Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport. Geomorphology 53: 299-316.
3. Betts HD, Trustrum NA, De Rose RC. 2003. Geomorphic changes in a complex gully system measured from sequential digital elevation models, and implications for management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 1043-1058.
4. Burkard MB, Kostaschuk RA. 1995. Initiation and evolution of gullies along the shoreline of Lake Huron. Geomorphology 14: 211-219.
5. Burkard MB, Kostaschuk RA. 1997. Patterns and controls of gully growth along the shoreline of Lake Huron. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 22: 901-911.
6. Casalí J, López JJ, Giraldez JV. 1999. Ephemeral gully erosion in southern Navarra (Spain). Catena 36: 65-84.
7. Casalí J, Bennett SJ, Robinson KM. 2000. Processes of ephemeral gully erosion. International Journal of Sediment Research 15: 31-41.
8. Casalí J, Loizu J, Campo MA, De Santisteban LM, Álvarez-Mozos J. 2006. Accuracy of methods for field assessment of rill and ephemeral gully erosion. Catena 67: 128-138.
9. Daba S, Rieger W, Strauss P. 2003. Assessment of gully erosion in eastern Ethiopia using photogrammetric techniques. Catena 50: 273-291.
10. De Rose RC, Gómez B, Marden M, Trustrum NA. 1998. Gully erosion in Mangatu forest, New Zealand, estimated from digital elevation models. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 23: 1045-1053.
11. Gabet EJ, Bookter A. 2008. A morphometric analysis of gullies scoured by post-fire progressively bulked debris flows in southwest Montana, USA. Geomorphology 96: 298-309.
12. Giesen J. 2008. Jürgen Giesen's GeoAstret Applets. http://www.GeoAstro.de [Accessed June 2008]
13. Govers G. 1992. Relationship between discharge, velocity and flow area for rills eroding loose, non-layered materials. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 17: 515-528.
14. Imeson AC, Kwaad FJPM. 1980. Gully types and gully prediction. KNAG Geografisch Tijdschrift XIV(5): 430-441.
15. Lane SN, James TD, Crowell MD. 2000. Application of digital photogrammetry to complex topography for geomorphological research. Photogrammetric Record 16(95): 793-821.
16. Martínez-Casasnovas JA. 2003. A spatial information technology approach for the mapping and quantification of gully erosion. Catena 50: 293-308.
17. Marzolff I, Ries JB. 2007. Gully erosion monitoring in semi-arid landscapes. Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie 51: 405-425.
18. Marzolff I, Poesen J. 2009. The potential of 3D gully monitoring with GIS using high-resolution aerial photography and a digital photogrammetry system. Geomorphology. DOI. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.05.047
19. Menéndez-Duarte R, Marquínez J, Fernández-Menéndez S, Santos R. 2007. Incised channels and gully erosion in Northern Iberian Peninsula: controls and geomorphic setting. Catena 71: 267-278.
20. Nachtergaele J, Poesen J. 1999. Assessment of soil losses by ephemeral gully erosion using high-altitude (stereo) aerial photographs. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 693-706.
21. Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Poesen J, Vandekerckhove L, Nachtergaele J, De Baerdemaeker J. 1999. Gully-head morphology and implications for gully development on abandoned fields in a semi-arid environment, Sierra de Gata, southeast Spain. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 24: 585-603.
22. Poesen J, Govers G. 1990. Gully erosion in the loam belt of Belgium: typology and control measures. In Soil Erosion on Agricultural Land, Boardman J, Foster IDL, Dearing JA (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 513-530.
23. Ries JB, Marzolff I. 1997. Identification of sediment sources by largescale aerial photography taken from a monitoring blimp. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 22: 295-302.
24. Vandaele K, Poesen J, Marques de Silva JR, Desmet P. 1996. Rates and predictability of ephemeral gully erosion in two contrasting environments. Geomorphology: Relief, Processes, Environment 2: 83-96.
25. Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Oostwoud Wijdenes D, Gyssels G, Beuselinck L, de Luna E. 2000. Characteristics and controlling factors of bank gullies in two semi-arid mediterranean environments. Geomorphology 33: 37-58.
26. Vandekerckhove L, Poesen J, Govers G. 2003. Medium-term gully headcut retreat rates in southeast Spain determined from aerial photographs and ground measurements. Catena 50: 329-352.
27. Vrieling A. 2006. Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: a review. Catena 65: 2-18.