Comparative transcriptional profiling under drought stress between upland and lowland rice (oryza sativa l.) using cDNA-aflp

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 54, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 3555-3571

  Gao, FengHua ^a   Zhang, HongLiang ^a   Wang, HaiGuang ^a   Gao, Hong ^a   Li, ZiChao ^a  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

cDNA AFLP; Drought stress; Lowland rice; Upland rice

Indexed keywords

ORYZA SATIVA;

EID: 70350530376     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-009-0524-5     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Seki M, Narusaka M, Abe H, et al. Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarry. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 61-72.
2. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J, 2002, 31: 279-292, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01359.x.
3. Ozturk Z N, Talamé V, Deyholos M, et al. Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley. Plant Mol Biol, 2002, 48: 551-573.
4. Rabbani M A, Maruyama K, Abe H, et al. Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol, 2003, 133: 1755-1767, doi: 10.1104/pp.103.025742.
5. Rizhsky L, Liang H J, Shuman J, et al. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol, 2004, 134: 1683-1696, doi: 10.1104/pp.103.033431.
6. Bray E A. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci, 1997, 2: 48-54, DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf159.
7. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2000, 3: 217-223.
8. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2003, 6: 410-417, doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00092-X.
9. Chinnusamy V, Schumaker K, Zhu J K. Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 225-236, doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh005.
10. Valliyodan B, Nguyen H T. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2006, 9: 189-195, doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019.
11. Islam M A, Du H, Ning J, et al. Characterization of Glossy1-homologous genes in rice involved in leaf wax accumulation and drought resistance. Plant Mol Biol, 2009, 70: 443-56, doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9483-0.
12. Karaba A, Dixit S, Greco R, et al. Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 15270-15275, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707294104.
13. Cai H, Zhou Y, Xiao J, et al. Overexpressed glutamine synthetase gene modifies nitrogen metabolism and abiotic stress responses in rice. Plant Cell Rep, 2009, 28: 527-537, doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0665-z.
14. Zheng X, Chen B, Lu G, et al. Overexpression of a NAC transcription factor enhances rice drought and salt tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009, 379: 985-989, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.163.
15. Hazen S P, Pathan M S, Sanchez A, et al. Expression profiling of rice segregating for drought tolerance QTLs using a rice genome array. Funct Integr Genomics, 2005, 5: 104-116, doi: 10.1007/s10142-004-0126-x.
16. Rodríguez M, Canales E, Borroto C J, et al. Identification of genes induced upon water-deficit stress in a drought-tolerant rice cultivar. J Plant Physiol, 2006, 163: 577-584, doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.005.
17. Zhou J, Wang X, Jiao Y, et al. Global genome expression analysis of rice in response to drought and high-salinity stresses in shoot, flag leaf, and panicle. Plant Mol Biol, 2007, 63: 591-608, doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-9111-1.
18. Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke J D, et al. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell, 1997, 88: 57-63, doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81858-9.
19. Yadav R, Courtois B, Huang N, et al. Mapping genes controlling root morphology and root distribution in a doubled-haploid population of rice. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 94: 619-632.
20. Qu Y, Mu P, Zhang H, et al. Mapping QTLs of root morphological traits at different growth stages in rice. Genetica, 2008, 133: 187-200, doi: 10.1007/s10709-007-9199-5.
21. Zheng B, Yang L, Mao C, et al. Comparison of QTLs for rice seedling morphology under different water supply conditions. J Genet Genomics, 2008, 35: 473-484, doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08) 60065-X.
22. Yue B, Xue W, Luo L, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for four morphologic traits under water stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Genet Genomics, 2008, 35: 569-575, doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60077-6.
23. Nguyen T T, Klueva N, Chamareck V, et al. Saturation mapping of QTL regions and identification of putative candidate genes for drought tolerance in rice. Mol Genet Genomics, 2004, 272: 35-46, doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1025-5.
24. Mu P, Li Z C, Li C P, et al. QTL mapping of the root traits and their correlation analysis with drought resistance using DH lines from paddy and upland rice cross. Chinese Sci Bull, 2003, 48: 1-7, doi: 10.1360/03wc0180.
25. Yue B, Xiong L Z, Xue W Y, et al. Genetic analysis for drought resistance of rice at reproductive stage in field with different types of soil. Theor Appl Genet, 2005, 111: 1127-1136, doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-0040-1.
26. Yue B, Xue W Y, Xiong L Z, et al. Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: Separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics, 2006, 172: 1213-1228, doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.045062.
27. Yu S, Chen T, Liu C. Comparative studies on the physiology of lowland and upland rice I. On the water relation and drought resistance of lowland rice "Lao Lai Ching" and upland rice "Nang Ton Xao". J Integr Plant Biol, 1958, VII: 187-201.
28. Lian H L, Yu X, Ye Q, et al. The role of aquaporin RWC3 in drought avoidance in rice. Plant Cell Physiol, 2004, 45: 481-489.
29. Lian H L, Yu X, Lane D, et al. Upland rice and lowland rice exhibited different PIP expression under water deficit and ABA treatment. Cell Res, 2006, 16: 651-660.
30. Wang H G, Zhang H L, Gao F H, et al. Comparison of gene expression between upland and lowland rice cultivars under water stress using cDNA microarray. Theor Appl Genet, 2007, 115: 1109-1126, doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0637-7.
31. Bachem C W, Oomen R J, Visser R G. Transcript imaging with cDNA-AFLP: A step-by-step protocol. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 1998, 16: 157-173.
32. Reijans M, Lascaris R, Groeneger A O, et al. Quantitative comparison of cDNA-AFLP, microarrays, and GeneChip expression data in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genomics, 2003, 82: 606-618, doi: 10.1016/S0888-7543(03)00179-4.
33. Yang L, Zheng B S, Mao C Z, et al. cDNA-AFLP analysis of inducible gene expression in rice seminal root tips under a water deficit. Gene, 2003, 314: 141-148, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00713-3.
34. Simoes-Araujo J L, Rodrigues R L, de A Gerhardt L B, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes by cDNA-AFLP technique during heat stress in cowpea nodules. FEBS Lett, 2002, 515: 44-50, doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02416-X.
35. De Paepe A, Vuylsteke M, van Hummelen P, et al. Transcriptional profiling by cDNA-AFLP and microarray analysis reveals novel insights into the early response to ethylene in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2004, 39: 537-559, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02156.x.
36. Bove J, Lucas P, Godin B, et al. Gene expression analysis by cDNAAFLP highlights a set of new signaling networks and translational control during seed dormancy breaking in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 57: 593-612, doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-0953-8.
37. Guo J, Jiang R H, Kamphuis L G, et al. A cDNA-AFLP based strategy to identify transcripts associated with avirulence in Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genet Biol, 2006, 43: 111-123.
38. Gao Y, Chen N Z, Xiong Y M, et al. Immunohistochemical localization for expansin in the root of upland rice and its expression analysis on the drought-resistance of upland rice (in Chinese). Prog Natl Sci, 2006, 16: 475-479.
39. Zou Q. Experimental Guides for Plant Physiology (in Chinese). Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000.
40. White D A, Beadle C L, Worledge D. Leaf water relations of Eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus and E. nitens: seasonal, drought and species effects. Tree Physiol, 1996, 16: 469-476.
41. Hura T, Hura K, Grzesiak S. Physiological and biochemical parameters for identification of QTLs controlling the winter triticale drought tolerance at the seedling stage. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2009, 47: 210-214.
42. Qu Y Y. Location and genetics analysis of the QTLs associated with drought resistance traits in lowland and upland rice. Doctor Dissertation. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2007.
43. Zheng J, Zhao J, Tao Y, et al. Isolation and analysis of water stress induced genes in maize seedlings by subtractive PCR and cDNA macroarray. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 55: 807-823.
44. Grover A. Molecular biology of stress responses. Cell Stress Chaperones, 2002, 7: 1-5.
45. Wickner S, Gottesman S, Skowyra D, et al. A molecular chaperone, ClpA, functions like DnaK and DnaJ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91: 12218-12222.
46. Khorana H G, Fernandez J F, Kornberg A. Pyrophosphorylation of ribose-5-phosphate in the enzymatic synthesis of 5-phosphorylribose 1-pyrophosphate. J Biol Chem, 1958, 230: 941-948.
47. Hove-Jensen B. Mutation in the phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase gene (prs) that results in simultaneous requirements for purine and pyrimidine nucleosides, nicotinamide nucleotide, histidine and tryptophan in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol, 1988, 170: 1148-1152.
48. Anderson G H, Hanson M R. The Arabidopsis Mei2 homologue AML1 binds AtRaptor1B, the plant homologue of a major regulator of eukaryotic cell growth. BMC Plant Biol, 2005, 5: 2.
49. Okkels J S, Scheller H V, Svendsen I, et al. Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding an 18-kDa hydrophobic photosystem I subunit (PSI-L) from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Biol Chem, 1991, 266: 6767-6773.
50. Mare C, Mazzucotelli E, Crosatti C, et al. Hv-WRKY38: a new transcription factor involved in cold- and drought-response in barley. Plant Mol Biol, 2004, 55: 399-416.
51. Leung J, Bouvier-Durand M, Morris P C, et al. Arabidopsis ABA response gene ABI1: Features of a calcium-modulated protein phosphatase. Science, 1994, 264: 1448-1452.
52. Leung J, Merlot S, and Giraudat J. The Arabidopsis ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE2 (ABI2) and ABI1 genes encode homologous protein phosphatases 2C involved in abscisic acid signal transduction. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 759-771.
53. van der Biezen E A, Sun J, Coleman M J, et al. Arabidopsis RelA/SpoT homologs implicate (p)ppGpp in plant signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2000, 97: 3747-3752.
54. Broin M, Cuiné S, Eymery F, et al. The plastidic 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin is a target for a thioredoxin involved in the protection of the photosynthetic apparatus against oxidative damage. Plant Cell, 2002, 14: 1417-1432.
55. Serrato A J, Cejudo F J. Type-h thioredoxins accumulate in the nucleus of developing wheat seed tissues suffering oxidative stress. Planta, 2003, 217: 392-399.
56. Huang D J, Chen H J, Hou W C, et al. Active recombinant thioredoxin h protein with antioxidant activities from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam Tainong 57) storage roots. J Agric Food Chem, 2004, 52: 4720-4724.
57. Rey P, Pruvot G, Becuwe N, et al. A novel thioredoxin-like protein located in the chloroplast is induced by water deficit in Solanum tuberosum L. plants. Plant J, 1998, 13: 97-107.
58. Broin M, Cuiné S, Peltier G, et al. Involvement of CDSP32, a drought-induced thioredoxin, in the response to oxidative stress in potato plants. FEBS Lett, 2000, 467: 245-248.
59. Deshaies R J. SCF and Cullin/Ring H2-based ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 1999, 15: 435-467.
60. Moon J, Parry G, Estelle M. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and plant development. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 3181-3195.
61. Smalle J, Vierstra R D. The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 555-590.
62. Zhang Y, Xu W, Li Z, et al. F-box protein DOR functions as a novel inhibitory factor for abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure under drought stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 2121-2133.
63. Tezara W, Mitchell V J, Driscoll S D, et al. Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature, 1999, 401: 914-917.
64. Vuylsteke M, van Den Daele H, Vercauteren A, et al. Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation by cDNA-AFLP. The Plant Journal, 2006, 45: 439-446.
65. Zhu J K. Plant salt tolerance. Trends Plant Sci, 2001, 6: 66-71.
66. Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M, et al. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 889-905.
67. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene expression and signal transduction in water-stress response. Plant Physiol, 1997, 115: 327-334.
68. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2000, 3: 217-223.
69. Valliyodan B, Nguyen H T. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2006, 9: 189-195.
70. Nakashima K, Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, et al. A nuclear gene erdl encoding a chloroplast-targeted Clp protease regulatory subunit homolog is not only induced by water stress but also developmentally upregulated during senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J, 1997, 12: 851-861.
71. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Organization of cis-acting regulatory elements in osmotic- and cold-stress responsive promoters. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 10: 88-94.
72. Eulgem T, Rushton P J, Robatzek S, et al. The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci, 2000, 5: 199-206.
73. Yu D Q, Chen C H, Chen Z X. Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 1527-1539.
74. Matsubayashi Y, Takagi L, Sakagami Y. Phytosulfokine-α, a sulfated pentapeptide, stimulates the proliferation of rice cells by means of specific high- and low-affinity binding sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997, 94: 13357-13362.
75. Matsubayashi Y, Ogawa M, Kihara H, et al. Disruption and overexpression of Arabidopsis phytosulfokine receptor gene affects cellular longevity and potential for growth. Plant Physiol, 2006, 142: 45-53.
76. Yang H P, Matsubayashi Y, Nakamura K, et al. Oryza sativa PSK gene encodes a precursor of phytosulfokine-α, a sulfated peptide growth factor found in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 13560-13565.
77. Ferreira R M B, Rodrigues Ramos P C, Franco E, et al. Changes in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-protein conjugates during seed formation and germination. J Exp Bot, 1995, 46: 211-219.
78. Woffenden B J, Freeman T B, Beers E P. Proteasome inhibitors prevent tracheary element differentiation in zinnia mesophyll cell cultures. Plant Physiol, 1998, 118: 419-430.
79. Gachet Y, Tournier S, Lee M, et al. The growth-related, translationally controlled protein P23 has properties of a tubulin binding protein and associates transiently with microtubules during the cell cycle. J Cell Sci, 1999, 112: 1257-1271.
80. Bommer U A, Borovjagin A V, Greagg M A, et al. The mRNA of the translationally controlled tumor protein P23/TCTP is a highly structured RNA, which activates the dsRNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. RNA, 2002, 8: 478-496.
81. Yokota E, Yukawa C, Muto S, et al. Biochemical and immunocytochemical characterization of two types of myosins in cultured tobacco bright yellow-2 cells. Plant Physiol, 1999, 121: 525-534.
82. Reddy A S N, Day I S. Analysis of the myosins encoded in the recently completed Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence. Genome Biol, 2001, 2: RESEARCH0024.
83. Tominaga M, Kojima H, Yokota E, et al. Higher plant myosin XI moves processively on actin with 35 nm steps at high velocity. EMBO J, 2003, 22: 1263-1272.
84. Bartels D, Nelson D E. Approaches to improve stress tolerance using molecular genetics. Plant Cell Environ, 1994, 17: 659-667.
85. Sun W, van Montagu M, Verbruggen N. Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2002, 1577: 1-9.
86. Wang W X, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, et al. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci, 2004, 9: 244-252.
87. Tsvetkova N M, Horvath I, Torok Z, et al. Small heat-shock proteins regulate membrane lipid polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99: 13504-13509.
88. Harndahl U, Buffoni-Hall R, Osteryoung K W, et al. The chloroplasst heat shock protein undergoes oxidation-dependent conformational changes and may protect plants against oxidative stress. Cell Stress Chaperon, 1999, 4: 129-138.
89. Gustavsson N, Kokke B P, Harndahl U, et al. A peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase highly expressed in photosynthetic tissue in Arabidopsis thaliana can protect the chaperone·like activity of a chloroplast-localized small heat shock protein. Plant J, 2002, 29: 543-553.
90. Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2004, 55: 373-399.
91. Møller I M, Jensen P E, Hansson A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2007, 58: 459-48l.
92. Cho E K, Hong C B. Over-expression of tobacco NtHSP70-l contributes to drought-stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep, 2006, 25: 349-358.
93. Alvim F C, Carolino S M B, Cascardo J C M, et al. Enhanced accumulation of BiP in transgenic plants confers tolerance to water stress. Plant Physiol, 2001, l26: 1042-1054.
94. Murakami T, Matsuba S, Funatsuki H, et al. Over-expression of a small heat shock protein, sHSPl7.7. confers both heat tolerance and UV. B resistance to rice plants. Mol Breed, 2004, 13: 165-175.
95. Wang L, Zhao C M, Wang Y J, et al. Over-expression of chloroplastlocalized small molecular heat-shock protein enhances chilling tolerance in tomato plant. J Plant Physiol Mol Biol, 2005, 31: 167-174.