Correlation of increased fetal asymmetry with shoulder dystocia in the nondiabetic woman with suspected macrosomia

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 478-482

  Rajan, Priya V ^a   Chung, Judith H ^a   Porto, Manuel ^a   Wing, Deborah A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biometry; Fetal macrosomia; Shoulder dystocia; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DIAMETER; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; BIPARIETAL DISTANCE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS WEIGHT; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHOULDER DYSTOCIA; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DYSTOCIA; ECHOGRAPHY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PREGNANCY; RISK;

ADULT; CEPHALOMETRY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 70350515692     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Committee on Obstetrics: Shoulder Dystocia: Practice Bulletin 40. Washington, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, November 2002
2. Bahar AM: Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:868-872
3. Modanlou HD, Komatsu G, Dorchester W, et al: Large-for-gestational-age neonates: Anthropometric reasons for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:417-423
4. McFarland MB, Trylovich CG, Langer O: Anthropometric differences in macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers. J Matern Fetal Med 1998;7:292-295
5. Elliott JP, Garite TJ, Freeman RK, et al: Ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia in diabetic patients. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:159-162
6. Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, et al: The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymmetry in patients with diabetes. Am J Perinatal 1999;16:197-201
7. Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, et al: Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:10-13
8. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, et al: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 1984;150:535-540
9. Langer O, Berkus M, Huff R, et al: Shoulder dystocia: Should the fetus weighing ≥ 4000g be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:831-837
10. Acker DB, Sachs BP, Friedman EA: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1985;66:762-768
11. Baskett TF, Allen AC: Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:14-17
12. El Madany AA, Jallad KB, Radi FA, et al: Shoulder dystocia: Anticipation and outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;34:7-12
13. Miller RS, Devine PC, Johnson EB: Sonographic fetal asymmetry predicts shoulder dystocia. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:1523-1528
14. Gonen O, Rosen DJ, Dolfin Z, et al: Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: A randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:913-917
15. Leaphart WL, Meyer MC, Capeless EL: Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of macrosomia. J Matern Fetal Med 1997;6:99-102
16. McFarland M, Hod M, Piper J, et al: Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1211-1214
17. Rouse DJ, Owen J: Sonography, suspected macrosomia, and prophylactic cesarean: A limited partnership. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:326-334